I thought that when Rusty used his credentials to characterize (with righteous bias) something I said as simply nonsense he was out and ready to play. he was personal first in the conversation, drifting off the point to toss out an insult. I would never have noticed his existence in the thread otherwise.
no harm intended rusty, it's just your cred doesn't really mean anything in some circles, so just leave it out of it and make your point naked, like the rest of us mortals.
and CT, since you're so confident that quibbling was my bad, I have to say: anything you said is simply nonsense. we good?
since the thread is part tribute, back on track, regards and respect to the little girl.
I was out and ready to play. No harm taken. But, unlike the emperor, I prefer to remain clothed in public. My cred was meant to establish that I know emergency maneuvers are possible on a snowboard. I know this because I can do them. You know that they are impossible because? Wait, I withdraw the question as irrelevant. It's asking you to prove a negative. So even if you do ride, you could not prove the point. So at this point I'm more than happy to just laugh the "debate" off. Bears can make up their own minds who the bigger BS'er is.
I stand behind my cred. But I will beg off on the Jackson praise. Mikey was just being kind to one of his students. I believe his exact words were "we'll go around next time". One might describe navigating some of the runs at Jackson as a series of linked emergency maneuvers, but I just threw that in to see if I could get a laugh out of davluri.