Hi Guys! I’m not sure if this should be listed in the “Ask the Boot Guys” or “Ski Gear”, but here is my dilemma. I’m an instructor on the East coast and I have a number of bio-mechanical issues, i.e. bow-legged, bunions, ankle pocket on one foot slightly ahead of the preformed bootpocket. My boots are dialed in. The soles have been planed to 3.5 degrees on the right and 5.5 degrees on the left, the heel and toe lugs routed to meet Din. This makes it difficult to make any further adjustments to the boot. In the clinics that I’ve attended the clinicians have indicated that I would benefit from having lifts under my binding toe pieces. The dilemma is that with todays’ integrated bindings this becomes increasingly difficult to do. One solution suggested is to get a pair of Race Stock slalom skis with a soft flex. It was also suggested that perhaps a Race Stock GS ski, soft flex, might be a better choice. With all my bio-mechanical issues the narrower the waist the better, quicker edge to edge. I’m 5’8”, 61 and approximately 195 lbs. I normally ski at a 5.5 - 6 din setting. I'm really looking at something similar in performance to the Volkl Supersport 5 Star and Supersport S5 that I've been skiing on. Visiting Volkl’s web site, I notice that the new RaceTiger comes with the rMotion binding which is mounted on a race plate, which appears to be a flat surface. If so, would this allow for the toe lifts to be mounted between the binding and race plate? Would the RaceTiger, SL or GS, be a better solution than Race Stock, SL or GS? As I’m exploring solutions here, I’d appreciate any thoughts from “The Boot Guys”. Sorry for the long post, but I was trying to include a lot of information. THANKS!
"You don't grow too old to ski, you grow old because you stop playing"