Originally Posted by Coach13
Yep--they're not much as of yet. One big difference though. The Nats started from scratch
and haven't developed into much yet.
No, the Nats are the Montreal Expos, who started in 1969. They have baseball in Canada... it sucks.
I can truly understand the idea that the 'Skins are a terrible franchise, but I really don't think they even come close to "worst team ever", not when you have organizations like the lowly Pittsburgh Pirates, a Detroit lions team that was 0 for last year (combine that with their complete aversion for success throughout their history), the LA Clippers, Golden State Warriors (are they still a team???)... see what I'm getting at? At least the redskins are noteworthy.
I feel that ownership groups should have a 10 season term to produce a quality product or risk losing the franchise, in all sports. Put a competitive product on the field or the league (which ever) has the right to find someone else who will.Edited by Whiteroom - 12/28/09 at 6:45am