EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › General Skiing Discussion › Within driving distance of Chicago
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Within driving distance of Chicago

post #1 of 45
11/6/09 at 11:19am
Thread Starter 
Every year I get about 20 days out west (mostly Big Sky) but I've been living in Chicago for 4 years and have yet resisted skiing in the Midwest.  This year my wife & I committed to taking some beginner friends to a local mountain but I have no idea where to go.  Any other Midwesterners have any suggestions?  The challenge is that my wife & I don't want to be completely bored after 3 runs. 
Reply
post #2 of 45
11/6/09 at 11:55am
Chestnut is about 3 hours drive and is one of the better hills.  It's fairly well run, it's pretty along the Mississippi and Galena is kind of a neat town. . To get much better you have to drive 6-7 hours into Michigan and by that point,  I would just drive to Colorado.  
Reply
post #3 of 45
11/6/09 at 11:58am
Thread Starter 
Thanks Shredhead.  Do you know anything about Devils Head?  Heard it was ok...  By the way, I agree with you but our friends are only beginners and getting them out will be tough enough. 
Reply
post #4 of 45
11/6/09 at 12:08pm
DH is about the same, but slightly further. 
Reply
post #5 of 45
11/6/09 at 12:13pm
Thread Starter 
Seems like you're an out of place mountain lover like us.  Chicago is a great city 3 seasons out of the year but during winter .... all that snow and no decent mountains...  Makes you want to cry.
Reply
post #6 of 45
11/6/09 at 12:53pm
 I am in awe of the dedication of skiers on this board from Chicago and other midwest locations.  Before joining this board I had no idea that alpine skiers even existed in the flatlands, beyond a very token number.  I've grown up spoiled rotten and it does me good to see what others have to do to get their fix.  It helps me appreciate what I have.
Reply
post #7 of 45
11/6/09 at 1:11pm
Little hills in the midwest make you appreciate the mountains, but we in the midwest use what we have, and travel when we can.
Most little hills (in the midwest) are considered day trip skiing or night trip skiing, very few would be more than that, although some are good for a weekend.
Reply
post #8 of 45
11/6/09 at 1:50pm

You could try Bittersweet in Otsego MI.  I think it is under a 3 hour drive east on I94.  It isn't spectacular but it does have a high speed lift and "wonder carpets" for the beginners.  It is probably the best place in lower MI within 3 hours.  I am not saying you won't get bored but at least it is skiing.  The hills are at least long enough that you can turn a few times.  It is really all relative to what is available.  I would rather go there than not at all.  Anything better would be another 3-4 hours.  It would be worth a try if you are taking beginners or just want to go to get a quick fix. 

Reply
post #9 of 45
11/6/09 at 1:57pm
I'm not familiar with the options within a short drive of Chicago, but you might want to check this out for your beginner friends:
www.goskimichigan.com/discover-michigan-skiing.html

$30 for lift ticket, lesson & rental.  You'll have to drive a bit though....the closest is probably Bittersweet about 2 hours from Chicago depending on traffic and where in Chicago you start. Bittersweet's not much of a hill, you'll need to go farther for that.

  The western UP resorts are worth a trip, but not all that close - about 7 hours. I'd recommend Indianhead or the Porkies.  You might like Mt Bohemia (about another 3 hours drive) but don't take your newbie friends there.

On the leeside of lake Michigan, Crystal, the Boynes and Nubs attracts lots of Chicago skiers. Figure 5 hours to Crystal, 6 to the others.  Definitely a step up from Bittersweet, but you'll still be disappointed if you have Big Sky dreams.

I'd probably recommend a weekend in Boyne Country.  Amenities galore, and lots of easy beginner runs for your friends.  If you go to Nubs, you can ski the glades while your friends take the easy groomers and meet up at the same lift.

The other option would be a weekend trip to Caberfae and Crystal near Cadillac.  It's a bit closer, and Caberfae has some very cheap lift tickets if you look around.
Reply
post #10 of 45
11/6/09 at 2:07pm
Another place to consider is Granite Peak in Wasau, WI.  About 4.5 hours from Chicago.  We have also gone to Casacade in the Wisconsin dells.  It is about 3 hours.  After having done trips to both, I would drive the extra 90 minutes to go to Granite.
Reply
post #11 of 45
11/6/09 at 2:37pm
Hmmm - I wonder if 4 Lakes is still open. Ayup - thar it is. That's in Lisle - within 30 miles of downtown Chitown! I guarantee you can't spit a watermelon seed from the top the bottom. 1/2 way maybe. I used to live about 10 miles from there and I got bored just driving by the place. But it's a great place to learn. So save a few hours of driving and get on a snowboard to make things interesting.
Reply
post #12 of 45
11/6/09 at 3:09pm
Hey, Bob. I lived in Utah for 7 years and understand where you're coming from. The terrain in the Midwest simply does not compare. However, there are plenty of options for a fun skiing experience, IMO. I live in Traverse City, Michigan, which is just over 5 hours from Chicago in the northern Lower Peninsula. I ski at Crystal Mountain, which is just west of Traverse and is one of the larger resorts in the state. The snow quality can be surprisingly good - we got over 200" last year and we skied a LOT of nice powder. It's about 5 hours from Chicago. 

Let me know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer.
Reply
post #13 of 45
11/6/09 at 3:17pm
I'd hit up Granite Peak, Cascade, or Devils Head if we are talking a one day or maybe one night trip. Granite Peak will have the most terrain and can keep you busy for a full day.

If you want to make a long weekend and don't mind about an eight hour drive Lutsen is an excellent resort with very good lodging deals. You can ski there for a good two days without becoming bored. Plenty of terrain for everyone. Reminds me of some of the NE resorts with about 500-1000ft less vertical. Lutsen does have about a 1000 ft. vertical, three mountains, and even a gondola.

If you and your wife really want to do some challenging skiing in the midwest take a long weekend and hit up Mount Bohemia. You'll be pleasantly surprised at what they offer for a midwest ski hill. Vertical is 900 ft. and all of it is used. No groom runs and acres of acres of glades. You can actually ski powder in the Midwest at Mt. Bohemia. They get dumped on all winter. Not uncommon for them to pick up a few inches every day to every other day and at least once a week get a 8+ inch dumping over a 24 hour period. If you hit up there website they'll send you a DVD for free.

Any day at the hill is better then a day not at the hill. :)
Reply
post #14 of 45
11/6/09 at 3:47pm
Chestnut ski resort at Galena, IL on the banks of the Mississippi.
Here's a picture of Chestnut (on the banks of the Mississippi) taken last March.

Spring skiing fun!

EC
Reply
post #15 of 45
11/6/09 at 3:51pm
I will second Chestnut. Most of the other hills listed have either a flat top then a little drop of a little drop and then a long flat run out. Chestnut has a few runs that have a nice consistent pitch the whole way down. Sure it is small, but it beats sitting on the couch. BTW I am transplanted Mainer that grew up at Sugarloaf and I still find entertainment at the small hills here. It's all about just getting out and having fun. There is no such thing as a bad day of skiing.
Reply
post #16 of 45
11/6/09 at 6:23pm
 I wouldn't waste my time driving 4 hours to Devils Head, it's 45 min from my house and I won't go there.

I've always heard good things about Chestnut, might be a great place to take two probies.

If anyone from the windy city tells you to go to Wilmot, RUN!!!
Reply
post #17 of 45
11/6/09 at 6:46pm
Thread Starter 
Wow, thanks so much for everyone's advise.  I lived 6 years in Southern Germany and skied all over the alps, then 3 years in NH and of course our best friends live in Big Sky.  It breaks my heart every time I look at the trail maps in the Midwest.  Really, black & double black at Wilmont???  By what standard.  Guess Chestnut is the best choice within 3 to 5 hours drive. 
Reply
post #18 of 45
11/7/09 at 3:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob4snow View Post

Wow, thanks so much for everyone's advise.  I lived 6 years in Southern Germany and skied all over the alps, then 3 years in NH and of course our best friends live in Big Sky.  It breaks my heart every time I look at the trail maps in the Midwest.  Really, black & double black at Wilmont???  By what standard.  Guess Chestnut is the best choice within 3 to 5 hours drive. 
Add 2 hrs to that drive time (7 hrs) and try Mt. Bohemia in the UP, but don't take beginners there. But the 'nut will be good for beginners. Wilmot is better than nothing, just very crowded. To many Chicago people. LOL
Reply
post #19 of 45
11/7/09 at 5:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob4snow View Post

Really, black & double black at Wilmont???  By what standard. 

It is kind of sad and can lead to a rude awakening for beginners moving up to real mountains. The standard for trail ratings in the US is that they are always relative to the mountain, not to other mountains. You asked. On the plus side, an inflated double black trail rating does tend to create a little extra space for people who can actually ski.
Reply
post #20 of 45
11/7/09 at 4:31pm
Bohemia's gotta be way more than 7 hours from Chicago.

Bohemia and the surrounding bc is the only place I've skied in the midwest for years.You and your wife will not get bored at Bohemia. Maybe you could stay in Houghton, your beginner freinds could ski at Ripley and you and your wife could ski Bohemia? You wouldn't actually be in a group tho. Actually, Ripley would probably be pretty fun for everybody, but it's not worth a 10 hour drive. Bohemia's probably not either unless you hit it just right. Seems to me I remember the second or third year Bohemia was running lifts there was some guy from Chicago who would drive up almost every weekend.

I think you'd be better off all flying out to Big Sky. Maybe if the beginners didn't dig skiing they could go slednecking in W Yellerstone?
Reply
post #21 of 45
11/7/09 at 5:11pm
If you have to do more than 3 hr drive, I guess you would opt to fly out west,

closest to chicago is Wilmot, open until 11pm, it's so close that I can do afterwork, I had 50 days skiing easily this way, one hill, 4-5 similar steep runs, they usually set up one mogul run in the later of season.

Cascade Mnt, 3 hr drive, but worth it, I like more than Devil's head. Easy access, right by the highway.

Devil's head, close to Cascade, wider, has more runs than Cascade, but  they are pretty much the same, there is an interesting mogul on one side. The parking is quite stupid, it is far away from the main lifts.

Both Cascade & Devil's head has WiFi, no for Wilmot.

For the lower Michigan, 1.5-2hr drive, there are Timber Ridge & Bitter Sweet. I personally prefer Timber Ridge, it's wider, more runs, has WiFi, not sure about Bitter, 'coz I'd been there only twice.
Reply
post #22 of 45
11/7/09 at 5:18pm
What's with this WiFi crap? Are we still talking about skiing?
Reply
post #23 of 45
11/7/09 at 5:34pm
Chicago to Mt. Bohemia is about 7.5 hours(north side) to 9 hours depending on your location in Chicago.

It's a long ways but if you stay a few nites it can be a cheap long ski weekend with some pretty damn good skiing.
Reply
post #24 of 45
11/7/09 at 6:42pm

> Bohemia's gotta be way more than 7 hours from Chicago.


It is Nine hours in good weather.  More if it snows. Which it does a lot in the Keewenaw.


 Maybe you could stay in Houghton, your beginner freinds could ski at Ripley and you and your wife could ski Bohemia?

There's not much for beginners at Ripley. Don't take your beginner friends there. Trust me. My wife and I skied it our second year and it kicked our ass.  I've been back since, and I'd say you need to be a solid intermediate to ski it.
Reply
post #25 of 45
11/7/09 at 11:18pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by romerun View Post

If you have to do more than 3 hr drive, I guess you would opt to fly out west,

closest to chicago is Wilmot, open until 11pm, it's so close that I can do afterwork, I had 50 days skiing easily this way, one hill, 4-5 similar steep runs, they usually set up one mogul run in the later of season.

Cascade Mnt, 3 hr drive, but worth it, I like more than Devil's head. Easy access, right by the highway.

Devil's head, close to Cascade, wider, has more runs than Cascade, but  they are pretty much the same, there is an interesting mogul on one side. The parking is quite stupid, it is far away from the main lifts.

Both Cascade & Devil's head has WiFi, no for Wilmot.

For the lower Michigan, 1.5-2hr drive, there are Timber Ridge & Bitter Sweet. I personally prefer Timber Ridge, it's wider, more runs, has WiFi, not sure about Bitter, 'coz I'd been there only twice.

Dear Flatlander,

What the hell is WiFi????????????

I'll give you thumbs up on the bar at Wilmot, but don't false advertise the hill, it sucks, point blank...and what's up with the black & red spyder coat-n-pant, is it a Chicago thing?

Sorry, just an observation.

Wilmot:





Lastly, Bohemia is an 8 hour drive from Madison, FIB Town is 2 1/2 hours south, how could it take 7 hours to get there. How can you people tell him these drive times; Lutsen 8 hours??? Ya, if your on the Auto Bond.
Reply
post #26 of 45
11/8/09 at 6:45am
Thread Starter 
Jer:  That's just what we've done the last 4 years in Chicago.  We have broken out our old Volkl 7-24 AC3 skis for the midwest.  It would kill me to take my Mantra's to any of these hills.

For all of you reading this who are lucky enough to live in the mountains, don't slam us for living in Chicago, work has a habit of sending you places you don't want to be.  Besides it is a great city 3 seasons out of the year...
Reply
post #27 of 45
11/8/09 at 8:15am
I agree bob, just because we are in Chicago does not mean we can't get out and have some fun. Those lucky enough to live in the mountains tend to lose sight of that. It is all about perspective. We do what we have to do to get our fix when we can't travel to the mountains. While Wilmot might be a small little bump, the place has some great history and is older than many out west places, at least respect the history of the place. Also remember that small areas (like Buck Hill) have turned out some US teamers, and Buck is no bigger than Wilmot. 
Reply
post #28 of 45
11/8/09 at 9:45am
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDoyal View Post

While Wilmot might be a small little bump, the place has some great history and is older than many out west places, at least respect the history of the place. Also remember that small areas (like Buck Hill) have turned out some US teamers, and Buck is no bigger than Wilmot. 

You are 100% correct, I take back my slam on Wilmot, it truly does have allot of great history.

Ever notice when reading pro skier profiles the large amount that grew up in the mid west.

I know statistics don't mean much, specially when measuring quality over quantity, but did you know Michigan with 38 & Wisconsin with 34 are the 2nd & 3rd largest ski area states in the nation [NSAA]. That tells me there are allot of passionate skiers in the mid west.

Seriously, What is this WiFi?
Reply
post #29 of 45
11/8/09 at 4:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jag View Post





Seriously, What is this WiFi?
For real? WiFi= wireless internet access. Although I don't think it has ever crossed my mind that I might want my laptop on a short day trip skiing, of course it comes with me on weekends and vacations though.
Reply
post #30 of 45
11/8/09 at 5:49pm
Midwest hills are great for practice.

The best choices from Chicago are Wilmot, Alpine Valley, and Chestnut. Chestnut is the most interesting, Alpine is like a slightly bigger Wilmot. Devil's Head and Cascade are not worth driving farther than Alpine. 

Sunburst in Milwaukee is a great choice for instruction.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Skiing Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › General Skiing Discussion › Within driving distance of Chicago