or Connect
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › General Skiing Discussion › I'm back and taking questions.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

I'm back and taking questions. - Page 2

post #31 of 103
Can we have another haiku thread? 
post #32 of 103
I know a Professor Chaos from Colorado. Any relation? 
post #33 of 103
I need advice on putting a smile on my honey's face, chaos do you recommend the puerto rican double bump or the mexican  taco tango. thanks so much!
post #34 of 103
 I was trying to ignore his posts, your quoting him did not help.
post #35 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squawker View Post

What is the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything?

To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
post #36 of 103
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BushwackerinPA View Post




ok prove it? prove to me that there is a god.
Why do you need me to prove it to you? Is it because you are completely unable to prove that the millions of species on earth today evolved from one single-celled organism?  If you were 100% sure of your own beliefs you wouldn't need proof for the beliefs of others. You have faith in a theory, one that the originator himself eventually found was vastly flawed.  But if that's good enough for you, so be it.
post #37 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by tromano View Post

Can we have another haiku thread? 


Shoulder season sucks
Trolls post threads and we reply
O Ullr: please snow!
post #38 of 103
What's better, skiing or sex?


(And which do you do more frequently?)
post #39 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squawker View Post

What is the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything?
 42
post #40 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos View Post



Why do you need me to prove it to you? Is it because you are completely unable to prove that the millions of species on earth today evolved from one single-celled organism?  If you were 100% sure of your own beliefs you wouldn't need proof for the beliefs of others. You have faith in a theory, one that the originator himself eventually found was vastly flawed.  But if that's good enough for you, so be it.
 


My squashing your beliefs is about being right. although I feel your entitled to be scared of a supreme pixie dust fairy in the sky if you do something wrong, its not your fault your parents perpetuated this pixie fairy to you, so I ll try to right that wrong. there is more proof for my beliefs than there ever has been for yours. Theory? You don't know what theory mean like most uneducated people in this world. Theory has 2 drastically different meanings.

the first one when talking about Darwins Origin of species is this one

A theory, in the scientific sense of the word, is an analytic structure designed to explain a set of empirical observations. A scientific theory does two things:

  1. it identifies this set of distinct observations as a class of phenomena, and
  2. makes assertions about the underlying reality that brings about or affects this class.

Theory is actually the most Iron clad of all scientific principles, it takes quantifiable properties, observations and abstract phenomena , and use logic to make it to a scientific Theory which in the scientific world is accept to be FACT. It is alot different than a Theory in humanities which is only based on ideas. Theory is science is based on fact, and can be tested though experiment. which darwins theory has been tested over and over again.

  Secondly Darwin himself DID NOT refute his finding and even if he did refute his finding it is simply irrelevant. Honestly link me to where it says Darwin said his planned was flawed.it is irrelevant because  If Galileo would have refuted his finding later is in his years it still doesn't change the fact that we revolve around the sun and not the other way around. It goes the same with darwin even if he did not like what he had originally said it still doesnt change the fact that what he said was true.

Lastly you said there isnt ounce of proof? Do you look anything like you parents at all? hmmn maybe you look ALOT like you parents. Do you kids look anything like you? betch ya they do. You also most likely picked you SO because they were best you can do in you life time. Lastly it doesnt take much to prove natural selection in humans. since I know you have a thing for Clair from hereos from your TGR musing about her when she was WAY under 18. so who would rather be with Hayden?



or this girl


I know which one most people would choose, simply put are own natural selection isnt so black and white all the time, and there are guys out that who would settle for that ^. Still to sit there and to deny what you see everyday in ourselves and in the animals and plants around us because there is a guy in rome who says that some supreme pixies being says we were put here complete is simply wrong and does anyone who learns creatationism a disservice to being able to know what is going around them. Just because your mind lacks the capacity to be able to understand science doesnt mean you should go around pushing YOUR beliefs on other people when there is NO physical evidence to back it up.

so whats you saying we are the ONLY life in the universe? Us being the only life put in the universe by some supreme being is doing yourself a intellectual disservice to believe that. Us being the only life would be more profound than finding life on a other earth like world which there are billions of in the entire Universe.

So first question is your God infinite or limited? Is he all encompassing or is he only here on earth in our solar system? I curious to know what you think about that last one, you wont answer it anyways, I can take your question head on and tear it apart with fact but now you have absolutely no where to go.
post #41 of 103
I thought your real expertise was the bagging of  voluptuous  babes.  Aren't you handing out advise on that also?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos View Post

If anyone has any questions about skiing technique, ski locations or ski equipment please ask.  I know pretty much everything and am without a doubt the best skier on these forums and likely the world. 

Ask away...
post #42 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos View Post 

Ask away...

Who's your daddy?
post #43 of 103
Who does your hair?  
post #44 of 103
What would Jesus ski?
Type of gear?
Brand?
Terrain?
post #45 of 103
Tell me what to buy:

I need an all-mountain twin tip, rockered ski, constructed by hand in the lower 48, that I can use as my go-to board for skiing in the Poconos, where I generally get in two or three days a season. I'll be renting boots but want to own my own skis.
post #46 of 103
Bush ftw!  We haven't even gotten to page two and dude's already killin' it.  I'd bet my liiiiiife Josh has more answers than chaos about pretty much anything now that I've seen the sky/orange/God breakdown.   
post #47 of 103
What would happen if I were to microwave a microwave (think smaller oven within a larger one)?
post #48 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by prickly View Post

Tell me what to buy:

I need an all-mountain twin tip, rockered ski, constructed by hand in the lower 48, that I can use as my go-to board for skiing in the Poconos, where I generally get in two or three days a season. I'll be renting boots but want to own my own skis.

tee hee hee...  loaded question of the day right there...  Seeing as how we've drifted into rental boots, let's see what HITLER has to say about them!  (Extremely naughty language btw)

http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=173560
post #49 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Do Work View Post

Bush ftw!  We haven't even gotten to page two and dude's already killin' it.  I'd bet my liiiiiife Josh has more answers than chaos about pretty much anything now that I've seen the sky/orange/God breakdown.   

 


haha its all my feiable attempt to get chaos to look even dumber, take EVERYTHING way to seriousally.

writing that last psot was actually sort of fun, at least I debunk the that evolution is only "theory" bull crapplo when theory has a different meaning in science than it does in any other useage.

BTW your Hitler video is funny as hell.

"I am a complete f*cking jong, I should go to the tubing park"
post #50 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wear The Fox Hat View Post

Who's your daddy?
 

Hideki Matsui.
post #51 of 103
Holy crap that video is an instant classic!  Why all the hatin' on Jersey (yeah, too easy?) 

So is choas wearing Pink this season?
post #52 of 103
Are we there yet?
post #53 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acrophobia View Post





Shoulder season sucks
Trolls post threads and we reply
O Ullr: please snow!


 


Early November
Is the internet season
Trolls entertain 
post #54 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Altanaut View Post

Ginger or Mary Ann?

I've wanted a definitive answer to this question for decades, and since you "know pretty much everything" I figured you could enlighten me....

This is an easy one.

The definitive answer is three-way.

post #55 of 103
post #56 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squawker View Post

What is the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything?

Douglas Adams - great book. just don't forget your towel.
post #57 of 103
Um...are you gonna eat that?
post #58 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by BushwackerinPA View Post




the sky is blue because white light from the sun is refracted by particles in our atmosphere light would actually be violet if it wasnt for the shortest wave lengths getting absorbed by gas and small particles, the end results is the next shortest wave length of light(blue) gets reflected and scattered from the particle making our sky turn blue. Ever notice how the sky is paler as you look closer to the horizon? Its because it get more scattered the further away from you it get and thus the color duller.

What came first the chicken or the egg? Being a darwinist there is no answer to your question. I pose this question, at what point do we call it a organism known to us as a chicken? If your a creationist though the answer could be either.

lastly why is called orange is actually the most difficult to answer.but there is still an answer to this question.  Simply put it is actually named after the fruit orange. So a orange(color) is orange rather than a orange is orange(color). first time it ever appeared in print was 1542. FYI you part about not being able to get to orange with out going though green is simply wrong. the word green is undateably older than the word orange and comes from a german root meaning to grow groeni is the old german word.

 

That's pretty good but the second and third questions still linger.

Now, i'm not a farmer; but I think you need 2 chickens or 2 eggs to make a third chicken; so i'm still wondering why its "chicken" and "egg".

I suppose orange is correct, but then that leads to who came up with "yellow" for yellow and why.
Assigning words to colors must have been some interesting times. Imagine the arguments that came about trying to get everyone to agree to go from purple to violet to lavender.
post #59 of 103
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BushwackerinPA View Post





My squashing your beliefs is about being right. although I feel your entitled to be scared of a supreme pixie dust fairy in the sky if you do something wrong, its not your fault your parents perpetuated this pixie fairy to you, so I ll try to right that wrong. there is more proof for my beliefs than there ever has been for yours. Theory? You don't know what theory mean like most uneducated people in this world. Theory has 2 drastically different meanings.

the first one when talking about Darwins Origin of species is this one

A theory, in the scientific sense of the word, is an analytic structure designed to explain a set of empirical observations. A scientific theory does two things:

  1. it identifies this set of distinct observations as a class of phenomena, and
  2. makes assertions about the underlying reality that brings about or affects this class.

Theory is actually the most Iron clad of all scientific principles, it takes quantifiable properties, observations and abstract phenomena , and use logic to make it to a scientific Theory which in the scientific world is accept to be FACT. It is alot different than a Theory in humanities which is only based on ideas. Theory is science is based on fact, and can be tested though experiment. which darwins theory has been tested over and over again.

  Secondly Darwin himself DID NOT refute his finding and even if he did refute his finding it is simply irrelevant. Honestly link me to where it says Darwin said his planned was flawed.it is irrelevant because  If Galileo would have refuted his finding later is in his years it still doesn't change the fact that we revolve around the sun and not the other way around. It goes the same with darwin even if he did not like what he had originally said it still doesnt change the fact that what he said was true.

Lastly you said there isnt ounce of proof? Do you look anything like you parents at all? hmmn maybe you look ALOT like you parents. Do you kids look anything like you? betch ya they do. You also most likely picked you SO because they were best you can do in you life time. Lastly it doesnt take much to prove natural selection in humans. since I know you have a thing for Clair from hereos from your TGR musing about her when she was WAY under 18. so who would rather be with Hayden?



or this girl


I know which one most people would choose, simply put are own natural selection isnt so black and white all the time, and there are guys out that who would settle for that ^. Still to sit there and to deny what you see everyday in ourselves and in the animals and plants around us because there is a guy in rome who says that some supreme pixies being says we were put here complete is simply wrong and does anyone who learns creatationism a disservice to being able to know what is going around them. Just because your mind lacks the capacity to be able to understand science doesnt mean you should go around pushing YOUR beliefs on other people when there is NO physical evidence to back it up.

so whats you saying we are the ONLY life in the universe? Us being the only life put in the universe by some supreme being is doing yourself a intellectual disservice to believe that. Us being the only life would be more profound than finding life on a other earth like world which there are billions of in the entire Universe.

So first question is your God infinite or limited? Is he all encompassing or is he only here on earth in our solar system? I curious to know what you think about that last one, you wont answer it anyways, I can take your question head on and tear it apart with fact but now you have absolutely no where to go.




 
All that and you still believe in nothing more than a unproven, inconclusive and frankly preposterous theory. Yet you accuse me of being silly for placing my faith in the unfounded and unprovable.  At least my beliefs make more sense.  No scientist has been able to prove that Darwin's theory is true.  No scientist has been able to prove that, starting with one organism, through the process of mutations, spawned all the species we see today. 

We can joust till the cows come home Bushwacker, but the fact remains, you will never know God until you seek Him with an open heart.  If you reject God, He will reject you.

I have a new girlfriend.  I'm going to teach her to ski this year.  She is from Florida and has never seen snow. 
post #60 of 103
^^Fish on!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Skiing Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › General Skiing Discussion › I'm back and taking questions.