or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Questions about exertion... - Page 2

post #31 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
How long must a max heart rate be sustained to count? Just curious.
i've never seen any criteria for maintaining it for a certain amount of time. i would imagine any of the ecg type monitors can calculate it from the time between two heartbeats.
post #32 of 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
What the heck is a crossfit Met-con.

In my college-day experiment i just did about 5 minutes of alternating between sets of 50 speed sit ups and 50 speed push ups did the trick.
Metabolic Conditioning, or “Cardio”
Biking, running, swimming, rowing, speed skating, and cross-country skiing are collectively known as “metabolic conditioning.” In
the common vernacular they are referred to as “cardio.” CrossFit’s third fitness standard, the one that deals with metabolic pathways
contains the seeds of the CrossFit “cardio” prescription. To understand the CrossFit
approach to “cardio” we need first to briefly cover the nature and interaction of the
three major pathways.
Of the three metabolic pathways the first two, the phosphagen and the glycolytic,
are “anaerobic” and the third, the oxidative, is “aerobic.” We needn’t belabor the
biochemical significance of aerobic and anaerobic systems; suffice it to say that the
nature and interaction of anaerobic exercise and aerobic exercise is vital to understanding
conditioning. Just remember that efforts at moderate to high power and
lasting less than several minutes are anaerobic and efforts at low power and lasting in
excess of several minutes are aerobic. As an example the sprints at 100, 200, 400, and
800 meters are largely anaerobic and events like 1,500 meters, the mile, 2,000 meters,
and 3,000 meters are largely aerobic.
Aerobic training benefits cardiovascular function and decreases body fat – all good.
Aerobic conditioning allows us to engage in low power extended efforts efficiently
(cardio/respiratory endurance and stamina). This is critical to many sports. Athletes
engaged in sports or training where a preponderance of the training load is spent in
aerobic efforts witness decreases in muscle mass, strength, speed, and power. It is
not uncommon to find marathoners with a vertical leap of only several inches! Furthermore,
aerobic activity has a pronounced tendency to decrease anaerobic capacity.
This does not bode well for most athletes or those interested in elite fitness.
Anaerobic activity also benefits cardiovascular function and decreases body
fat! In fact, anaerobic exercise is superior to aerobic exercise for fat loss! (http:
//www.cbass.com/FATBURN.HTM) Anaerobic activity is, however, unique in its
capacity to dramatically improve power, speed, strength, and muscle mass. Anaerobic
conditioning allows us to exert tremendous forces over brief time intervals. One
aspect of anaerobic conditioning that bears great consideration is that anaerobic
conditioning will not adversely affect aerobic capacity. In fact, properly structured,
anaerobic activity can be used to develop a very high level of aerobic fitness without
the muscle wasting consistent with high volumes of aerobic exercise!! The method
by which we use anaerobic efforts to develop aerobic conditioning is “interval training.”
Basketball, football, gymnastics, boxing, track events under one mile, soccer, swimming
events under 400 meters, volleyball, wrestling, and weightlifting are all sports
that require the vast majority of training time spent in anaerobic activity. Long distance
and ultra endurance running, cross country skiing, and 1500+ meter swimming
are all sports that require aerobic training at levels that produce results unacceptable
to other athletes or the individual concerned with total conditioning and optimal
health.
We strongly recommend that you attend a track meet of nationally or internationally
competitive athletes. Pay close attention to the physiques of the athletes competing
at 100, 200, 400, 800 meters, and the milers. The difference you’re sure to notice is a
direct result of training at those distances.
post #33 of 34
I came across this link years ago, and have often it found it useful when trying to get a relative measure of cross training efforts. It shows calorie per hour expenditures for a wide variety of activities, and for three different body weights. I use an extrapolation of the weight/calorie relationship to approximate my personal expenditure.
http://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htm

But, its about time I got a heart rate monitor that works it all out for me automatically. That is, if the function is relatively accurate.
post #34 of 34
Heart rate monitor:
It’s all about the performance. Forget heart rate. The heart
rate monitor is a fun toy, though. Mix dehydration, beer, steep
hill, bicycle, hot humid day and see who can get the highest
number. I’ve seen seven people over 200 at once on the same
hill. What can you and your friends do?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: