or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why pick on SCSA? - Page 2

post #31 of 46
LM, you are right, that was equally inapproporiate. MOZ seems to have acknowladged this.
post #32 of 46
Thanks again AC. I tried to make that point tongue-in-cheek over on that forum.
web page
I believe MOZ has been well mannered and is mostly criticized for his views. I like open discussion but sure don't like it when people who disagree resort to coining terms like "socialist" or "nazi" for lack of a viewpoint.

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ October 21, 2001 08:56 AM: Message edited 1 time, by BobT ]</font>
post #33 of 46
>>I like open discussion but sure don't like it when people who disagree resort to coining terms like "socialist" or "nazi" for lack of a viewpoint.<<

How about "gang"?

(Webster's Dictionary defines a gang as: A group of persons working to unlawful or antisocial ends.)
post #34 of 46
Dear Todd,

Here's another definition for gang.

gang
Informal. A group of people who associate regularly on a social basis.

The gang from the office went to a clambake.

<FONT COLOR="#800080" SIZE="1">[ October 21, 2001 07:43 PM: Message edited 1 time, by SCSA ]</font>
post #35 of 46
>>Yo, "debate class breath"<<

Always can count on that level of class can't we?

Anyways, "gang" can be interpreted as nasty or nice. But then again, to much of the world "socialist" isn't a bad word either, but to some it is horrible.

My point really had more to do with the fact that as soon as we engage in censorship of any kind then it becomes difficult to gauge where the lines should be drawn. Actually I support your right to use the word "gang". We don't know which definition you mean, and a person using any such word can't be trusted in retrospect to tell you which way they meant it . . . so you are only left with opinions.

So even if the majority of folks think you really meant a word in the "nastier" context of its usage, it would still be a tyranny of the masses to allow their opinion to override your free speech.
post #36 of 46
rel·e·vance (re le' -vens) n.
1. Pertinence to the matter at hand.
post #37 of 46
bi·po·lar

Characterized by the alternation of manic and depressive states (often treated with Lithium).

----Bet we are in for a storm of dictionary definitions now!
post #38 of 46
I am not going there.

It would be toooooo easy.

oz
post #39 of 46
Anne
Some Classic SCSA for ya. Back when he called himself PMTS WACKO.

"Screw it. I've tried to be nice.
Let's see watcha got. Barnes, anyone. You think you've got it? I got more. I'll make you cry for Mommy and I've only been on skis for two years. You can lie behind text, now someone is calling you out. Since you speak with forked tongue, only you and God will know that a PMTS trained rookie pounded your sorry butt.

It's the Basin or Berthoud. You name the date and time and I'll be there.

I'm gonna bury you so deep the animals won't even be able to find you.
.......................

[This message has been edited by PMTS Wacko (edited May 08, 2001).]"

Full thread is at: http://www.epicski.com/cgi-bin/ultim...c&f=4&t=000334

Anne
So that is why everybody picks on SCSA. Take a look at this thread and see how it is done properly. http://www.epicski.com/cgi-bin/ultim...c&f=4&t=000444

Welcome aboard Anne.

Nord
post #40 of 46
I really didn't say any of those things I said.
post #41 of 46
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by SCSA:
I really didn't say any of those things I said.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

I believe you said those things more often than 97% of the people on this board.
post #42 of 46
I know you didn't say those things SCSA it was your evil twin PMTS Wacko or maybe Paul. Hmmm, multiple personalities. Which one skis the best?
post #43 of 46
As to which is the better skier...this is a mystery. What we do know is that they have both been skiing for two years or five or ten or something like that and that in that two, five ten or some other period of time have become highly skilled. I'm hoping that the two of them will enter a Powder 8 comp sometime. That would be interesting.
post #44 of 46
Hey,

That wasn't you it was your evil twin WACKO!
post #45 of 46
Lithium.
post #46 of 46
Murchison thinks I'm on lithium. How funny. I'd take it as a compliment, but te thinks everyone is on lithium! Murch. I'm naturally wacked! [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Lucky,
SCSA is a much better skier than Wacko.

irul,
Deep powder? Now you've found my weakness. But, by the time I see you it won't be a weakness anymore.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Skiing Discussion