I was surprised how some of his reviews, numbers or language, were totally different than what respected members of Epic, or anybody else, say. For instance, he thinks the Palmers are the second coming - no one here seems especially impressed - and he pans the new Fury, which people here seem to like a lot. And as usual, his Volkl reviews are mixed, stressing how demanding and un-versatile skis like the Mantra and AC4 are. Which most here see as super versatile skis.
Keelty's always favored Heads, but anyone have an opinion why his reviews are getting so contrarian? Just to stir things up? Because no one over there believes in skis fatter than 85 mm? Indigestion? :
In general PK's site always qualifies almost all reviews for skis above 9Xmm with some sort of warning about how they are only for aggressive big mountain use by good skiers. I am pretty sure it's his SOP. He does seem to love head skis but then again so do many people on epic.