guys im buying a set of fischers rx 8 and im wondering whether i should go with the 165 or 170. Im a above average skier--thanks, pete
post #1 of 25
4/19/07 at 7:07am
My doubt was not only on RX8. What I don't understand is do we still need such length for a short radius SL like ski? I remember in last year when people talked about ski length, I used to heard: "for modern shaped ski, we don't need extra length, if you're not sure, go shorter." And I also read similiar things in Atomic's ski selection guide. Well, this year it seems people're always talking longer is better (at least that's my feeling).
I must missed something?
Well the 170 are no longer avail. So now i can only get 165 the deal that i was offered was compelte set, bindings installed for 399 shipped. But now all they have are the 165. I ski mostly on the east coast, killington being the ultimate 2 a year getaway. Anyways guys im not sure what to do now with all the opinions--i cant really demo them anymore but i feel its a pretty good deal and all. WHAT SHOULD I DO?