Some of you may have seen my post about ski boots for wide feet a couple of days ago. Well today I went to a local boot fitter and he recomended the Mojo's. I'm really surprised that the 26.5 fit pretty good without any modifications. I could probably get into a 26 but he told me the shell size was the same with these boots. Does that sound right? The boot fitter told me I could ski them for a couple of days and see if I need to do anything to them. From what he told me these boots can be modified with inserts and the liner can be heated up to mold the foot bed. I would like to know what some of you think of these boots befor I buy them?
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Head Mojo heat fit ski boots
Featured Stories
Recent Reviews
-
My biggest caution: I don't know how on earth they are measuring these things. A 183 barely measures 180. I would have purchased a longer pair online had I known this. But this is the only...
-
I got these (184's) on the cheap from an experienced 6ft plus 190 lb. plus powderhound in his late 40's who was looking for a one ski quiver and this was not his ski. I think it might have been...
-
For dependable snow coverage, you can't beat Snow Summit. Summit is actually half of Big Bear Mountain Resorts so the pass includes Bear Mountain which makes the resort larger than it appears at...
-
THE SILVERTON MOUNTAIN EXPERIENCE Where is this place? We must be getting close. Eyes anxiously scan the steep canyon walls for any sign of a ski lift. It’s...
-
One of the largest ski resorts in the world, rich with Austrian history and a traditional approach to skiing. From a gastronomical perspective, the food and beverages are of a traditional Austrian...
Head Mojo heat fit ski boots
post #2 of 7
12/11/06 at 8:39pm
- Takecontrol618
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,276 Posts. Joined 10/2003
- Location: Wiscompton
- Select All Posts By This User
The Mojo is, in my opinion, the highest performance "park" boot out there. Many park boots are just high performance shells with bottom of the line liners designed to appeal to kids on a limited budget- i.e., the Salomon Foil, Nordica Supercharger Ignition, etc. The Head, however, combines a liner that is of just as much quality as any other liners in the S line, along with a fairly snug fit for how wide it is (103mm- these things are large!). Plus, it looks damn good.
To answer your questions: yes, most boots I've dealt with share the same shell and liner between whole and half sizes, with the difference being a thicker footbed in the "smaller" size.
Heating up the liner will not mold the footbed, or even the liner for that matter. It will pack it out a fair bit without having to ski in it, though- to the tune of 3 or 4 full days of skiing.
The "FCS" insert for Head boots is pretty much worthless. It's designed to appeal to shops who can only carry one or two lines of boots so that the small number of boots can fit a larger array of feet. If it does come down to using one of those to get the boot to fit properly, you're better off looking for a narrower boot to start with.
To answer your questions: yes, most boots I've dealt with share the same shell and liner between whole and half sizes, with the difference being a thicker footbed in the "smaller" size.
Heating up the liner will not mold the footbed, or even the liner for that matter. It will pack it out a fair bit without having to ski in it, though- to the tune of 3 or 4 full days of skiing.
The "FCS" insert for Head boots is pretty much worthless. It's designed to appeal to shops who can only carry one or two lines of boots so that the small number of boots can fit a larger array of feet. If it does come down to using one of those to get the boot to fit properly, you're better off looking for a narrower boot to start with.
- BBV13
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 176 Posts. Joined 8/2006
- Location: NC
- Select All Posts By This User
Takecontrol618
Thanks for the information. I really do need the width so a narrower boot is'nt a option. I dont know why he brought up the FCS inserts maybe it's a feature that most folks would like because of the width of these boots. He did tell me that the Mojo is the only boot he has off the shelf that will fit me because of my wide feet.I've got a pair of twin tips and some all mountain-carving skis. What do you think of these boots for free sking outside the park?
post #4 of 7
12/11/06 at 9:15pm
- Takecontrol618
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,276 Posts. Joined 10/2003
- Location: Wiscompton
- Select All Posts By This User
Most of a boot's performance comes from its fit- a responsive boot is one that holds your foot firmly. I liked the flex when I had it on, felt like My Falcon 10s- firm without being stiff or harsh.
post #5 of 7
12/11/06 at 11:23pm
- Richie-Rich
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,827 Posts. Joined 3/2006
- Location: Strong Island, NY
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
The Mojo is, in my opinion, the highest performance "park" boot out there. Many park boots are just high performance shells with bottom of the line liners designed to appeal to kids on a limited budget- i.e., the Salomon Foil, Nordica Supercharger Ignition, etc. The Head, however, combines a liner that is of just as much quality as any other liners in the S line, along with a fairly snug fit for how wide it is (103mm- these things are large!). Plus, it looks damn good.
To answer your questions: yes, most boots I've dealt with share the same shell and liner between whole and half sizes, with the difference being a thicker footbed in the "smaller" size. Heating up the liner will not mold the footbed, or even the liner for that matter. It will pack it out a fair bit without having to ski in it, though- to the tune of 3 or 4 full days of skiing. The "FCS" insert for Head boots is pretty much worthless. It's designed to appeal to shops who can only carry one or two lines of boots so that the small number of boots can fit a larger array of feet. If it does come down to using one of those to get the boot to fit properly, you're better off looking for a narrower boot to start with. |
post #6 of 7
12/11/06 at 11:54pm
- Singel
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 228 Posts. Joined 8/2006
- Location: Calgary, Canada
- Select All Posts By This User
I use those boots and very rarely see the inside of a park. I find them excellent for freeriding, powder, steeps, bumps, trees, everything. Very responsive with a nice, smooth flex. I really don't even find any drawbacks to them when carving high speed groomers, i know a stiffer "race type" boot would be better, but the Mojo's still don't decrease my enjoyment on-piste at all.
My only issue has been with pain in the instep, which I have largely fixed with a bootfitter. I was aware of some discomfort in the instep in the shop before purchasing them though, so unless you feel anything like that it shouldn't affect you. I also have quite wide feet, and got the 100mm last (they also come in a 103mm), and I don't believe I've had any real issues with the width.
It might still be a good idea to try another shop to compare some different brands. Regardless of performance/intended use differences between different boots, the most important factor is definately what fits your foot the best.
My only issue has been with pain in the instep, which I have largely fixed with a bootfitter. I was aware of some discomfort in the instep in the shop before purchasing them though, so unless you feel anything like that it shouldn't affect you. I also have quite wide feet, and got the 100mm last (they also come in a 103mm), and I don't believe I've had any real issues with the width.
It might still be a good idea to try another shop to compare some different brands. Regardless of performance/intended use differences between different boots, the most important factor is definately what fits your foot the best.
- BBV13
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 176 Posts. Joined 8/2006
- Location: NC
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
I use those boots and very rarely see the inside of a park. I find them excellent for freeriding, powder, steeps, bumps, trees, everything. Very responsive with a nice, smooth flex. I really don't even find any drawbacks to them when carving high speed groomers, i know a stiffer "race type" boot would be better, but the Mojo's still don't decrease my enjoyment on-piste at all.
My only issue has been with pain in the instep, which I have largely fixed with a bootfitter. I was aware of some discomfort in the instep in the shop before purchasing them though, so unless you feel anything like that it shouldn't affect you. I also have quite wide feet, and got the 100mm last (they also come in a 103mm), and I don't believe I've had any real issues with the width. It might still be a good idea to try another shop to compare some different brands. Regardless of performance/intended use differences between different boots, the most important factor is definately what fits your foot the best. |
Return Home
Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion
- Head Mojo heat fit ski boots
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Head Mojo heat fit ski boots
Currently, there are 870 Active Users
(116 Members and 754 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › How would you define an intermediate or advanced skiier? 7 minutes ago
- › Why are There Flush Sidewalls on All Mountain Skis? 13 minutes ago
- › One of those days ... Candide Thovex, new video 15 minutes ago
- › TR: Mt. Lola, May 18th, 2013 17 minutes ago
- › OFFICIAL 2013 Mothers Day/A-Basin Trip Report 42 minutes ago
- › Atomic Affinity Storm vs Blizzard Black Pearl (or other...) 52 minutes ago
- › Sir Francis Bacon length? 57 minutes ago
- › Mounting Bindings turned slightly toe out? 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
- › Volkl Kendo - length advice? 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
- › Technical Free Skiing Videos 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › 2011 Volkl Racetiger GS World Cup Ski by Nick Z Taos
- › 2007 Volkl AC40 Ski by Nick Z Taos
- › Snow Summit by mustski
- › Silverton Mountain by Fritzski
- › Kitzbühel by RichardW1995
- › Mt. Bachelor by Fritzski
- › 2012 FlyLow Gear Chemical M Pant by Fritzski
- › 2012 FlyLow Gear Higgins M Jacket by Fritzski
- › Durango Mountain Resort by Nick Z Taos
- › Taos Ski Valley by Nick Z Taos
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Taos Grades High in Geography by nolo
- › Great Glades Almighty! by nolo
- › Ski Racing Basics by nolo
- › Portillo: Open Your Mind to the Full Chilean... by nolo
- › Join EpicSki and Get Into Skiing! by Laurel Hill Crazie
- › Innovations in Design at the 2013 SIA SNOW Show by nolo
- › 2014 Rossignol Soul 7 Skis Review by mmckay
- › Tornik, Serbia by Ledeni Finac
- › Hot Dog...Return of Bobbie Burns and The Ski by Philpug
- › What's New with the Fischer Vacuum Boot... by nolo
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Gear, Resorts & More | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About EpicSki | Join the Community | Become an EpicSki Supporter | Follow us on Twitter! | Advertise
© 2013 EpicSki is powered by Huddler Active Outdoors | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About EpicSki | Join the Community | Become an EpicSki Supporter | Follow us on Twitter! | Advertise
© 2013 EpicSki is powered by Huddler Active Outdoors | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map








