I'm not too experienced in skiing, but have accumulated some experience while skiing (end enjoying it!) for 3 years now, being on basic Dynastar Omecarve 09 myself, but often borrowing friends' high performance skis, mostly from Volkl and Dynastar.
There is an interesting thing I wanted to ask the community's opinion about. I've skied on Omeglass 67 and P60 from these two opposing companies, and, joining that to my humble experience with Omecarve 09, found that Dynastar behaves (I'm talking about hardpack here) very lively and expressively compared to the Volkl. Volkl, however, goes solidly, like a tank, cutting the surface like a scalpel. I find that these skis, while being in the same category, are behaving with quite different flavours.
(personally, I liked Volkl more than Dynastar, though both skied amazingly)
This led me to thinking about what the major difference between Dynastar and Volkl could be.
Of course, I may be wrong and inexperienced, but would be grateful for any kind of insight.