EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Most Important skis of the decades
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Most Important skis of the decades - Page 11

post #301 of 332

 

Originally Posted by snokat View Post
[Big Sky, MT]

Top of A-Z chutes 2002.MyPicturesfromOLDComputer020.jpg



 

post #302 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog View Post

 



 


It was the only ski that matched his coat and boots. Definitely a choice of the decades.

 

post #303 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexzn View Post

Well.... your radness level definitely exceeds mine, because back in the days I considered the XScream Series an expert level ski (there was a bunch of other XScreams at a lower level, but the Series was the big brother).  I seriously doubted that an intermediate could handle the tail of that ski, but what did I know...  Subjectively, XScreams convinced a lot of people that I knew to ditch the old straight GS boards, and go to a shaped ski for off-piste skiing.  Before XScreams shaped skis were considered a groomer learning tool andy thus were shunned by hard-core guys.    In fairness, K2 Fours also did a lot to win those people over (but more for racing -- didn't Bode win some junior races on K2 4s?). 

 

As for Sollie being rebadged Atomics nowadays... - which Atomic is the BBR derived from? And I thought that Rocker 2 and Bent Chetler are different by more than just graphics.  And before you dismiss the mixed core skis wholesale, Mythic was a mixed core ski, and that was/is a burly ski that could do crud.  th_dunno-1[1].gif

 

Back to the original topic- the Gotama definitely played a big role in establishing a fat twin as a passable daily ride in the West, even though PR was the first on the block with is.  The history may be about to repeat itself with the BBR and the new Dynastar Chams.  popcorn.gif

 

 

P.S.  Hey, if you ever get to Squaw on a weekend day, give me a shout, would be fun to make some turns.  



 



Quote:
Originally Posted by beyond View Post

Well of course, I'm Rader than god.

 

You're right about the tail, it was really stiff compared to the front. Think that is why Salomon introduced the twin prolink design. But XScream owners remain weirdly loyal. And yeah, K2's did a lot of innovation back then. I owned a pair of Olin Sl's that I loved, think they were made by K2 in those days, no? 

 

You're also right that Sollie has never quite given itself up to its new Teutonic masters. Thus the Rocker2, BRR, other very French takes. May be why skis like the Shogun, still light n' quick, are popular. OTOH, bet that 20 BC's are bought for each Rocker2, and maybe 100 for each BRR. So not sure that adventurous spirit really gets 'em anywhere. But definitely think that being rebadged  Atomics doesn't help either. 

 

Yeah, lost in all this is that Dynastar (and Stockli) have made respectable "synthetic" cores all along, no issues with longevity. Metal probably helps, but seem to recall threads on why not all foams are/were created equal. Still, Rossignol and Salomon do not seen to have chosen their grail wisely, as the knight said. 

 

Hell, I argue with you as much as with my wife, so yes clearly we should do some turns...wink.gif

 

 



I guess it's true, what they say about opinions being like a-holes.  Here's mine. The X-scream may have been ok in deep soft snow, I wouldn't know, but as a hard-snow groomer ski it sucked.  It had next to no grip, and was totally unstable at anything above a pedestrian speed.  As far as a stiff tail, the ski was a total noodle, it's just that the tail was not as over-cooked as the tips.  Just my humble rolleyes.gifopinion. 

 

Solomon did make some good groomer skis (e.g. Lab and Equipe), the X-scream was not amongst them.

 

post #304 of 332

^^^Prolink proved to be nothing but a worthless, mostly cosmetic gimmick just like those blinking K2 light thingies. Regardless, the XScreams and Scream 10s were very easy to ski at moderate speeds, but a disaster beyond that. 

post #305 of 332

Speaking of Solomon's, I had a couple of good seasons on the Crossmax 10.  Don't know about the decades, but they were important to me :)

 

JF

post #306 of 332

Me and my brothers used to build ski jumps at Sharp Mountain in Pottsville, Pa., in the 60's.We would spend multiple seasons perfecting back scratchers, spread eagles, daffney's (sp)  and yeard sale crashes. We were in grade school and our bodies were like rubber. We always bounced back. Today, call the surgeon. One day were were doing tip rolls off moguls and I broke a badly delaminated head standard. I wish I would have kept all of the Martini Family skis. In those day my parents were ski instructors and got skis directly from Head. Proform? My dad started skiing on barrel slats with leather straps to hold the boot. Lots of lateral movement and prerelease as it is called these days. A long long time ago. Fun stuff

post #307 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by crgildart View Post

^^^Prolink proved to be nothing but a worthless, mostly cosmetic gimmick just like those blinking K2 light thingies. Regardless, the XScreams and Scream 10s were very easy to ski at moderate speeds, but a disaster beyond that. 


Pesioelectric dampening system found on the "Four" and Merlin awesome for finding your ski in deep snow on midnight rides in Donner summit area. Just bang your pole in the snow around where you lst it and the lights would blink. Kind of like the shoes my four year old wears.
post #308 of 332
Ok for my old to new school picks

The Ski
Hexcels
K2 cheese burgers
Rossi SM
Rossi 7s
Rossi 3m
K2 TNC
K2 Mod X Pro
Rossi Bandit series
Solomon Course and Equipe 9
Volant Chubbs
Volkl Gotma
Dynastar Big
And the piste' de resistant Volkl Mantra
Not in the best of order just as they popped in my head and are skis that influenced me and my early " extreme skiing" buddies of the early squaw valley rippers of the mid 80's Like Scmidt, Day, Plake the flake from south lake, Andrews and the like,
post #309 of 332

Armada JJ, 

Gotama

Both very different and influential in the transition of full rockered and tip and tail rockered ski market.  

 

 

post #310 of 332
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by ogranitechief View Post

Ok for my old to new school picks
The Ski-The quintessential bump ski from the 70's. icon14.gif
Hexcels- Honeycomb aircraft construction that never took off. icon13.gif
K2 cheeseburgers- A great beam of a ski, but not important. icon13.gif
Rossi SM- The first GS ski that was real friendly and VERY important. icon14.gificon14.gif
Rossi 7s- 4S yes icon14.gif 7S no icon13.gif
Rossi 3m- Do you mean the 4M, bump ski? either way, Noicon13.gif
K2 TNC- A GS ski with cool graphics, non race graphicsicon14.gif
K2 Mod X Pro- No. icon13.gif
Rossi Bandit series- Not a fan of these skis...at all..but they did create a good series segment. icon14.gif
Solomon Course and Equipe 9000- The First REAL monocoque skis ever offered that made other manufactures completely redesign their lines. icon14.gificon14.gif
Volant Chubbs- The first FAT ski that made people realize that fat skis are not just for powder. icon14.gif
Volkl Gotama-  I will give you the upcoming Manta, the Gotama rode on it's coat tails. icon13.gif
Dynastar Big- OK ski but not important. icon14.gif
And the piste' de resistant Volkl Mantra- Still the ski some compare all 98 waisted skis against. icon14.gif

Not in the best of order just as they popped in my head and are skis that influenced me and my early " extreme skiing" buddies of the early squaw valley rippers of the mid 80's Like Scmidt, Day, Plake the flake from south lake, Andrews and the like,

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

Armada JJ- So many more important skis before the JJ ever was introduced. icon13.gif

Gotama- See in above quote. 

Both very different and influential in the transition of full rockered and tip and tail rockered ski market.  

 

 

My thoughts in red along with a thumb if I agree or disagree. My opinion and YMMV. I am not saying any of these skis aren't good but I am looking in the context of the thread. 

 

This got me thinking about another view that has not been discussed in this thread. popcorn.gif

post #311 of 332

Rossi SM- The first GS ski that was real friendly and VERY important. icon14.gificon14.gif

 

 

I agree that the SM was a game changer.  Up until that point all high performance skis were based on the S/GS/DH models. The SM was the first high end ski that was designed to be easy to ski, but still deliver top performance.  I remember the racers called it the "Sloppy Mother."  That ski proved there was a market for non-race oriented (i.e. softer tail) high performance skis, which led the way to the diverse high end market we have now.
 

post #312 of 332

Salomon AxeCleaver - defined the hypercarving segment

post #313 of 332

If we're talking popularity contests..

 

The Olin Mark IVs, VI, VII, and Mark IV Comps were all over the place between 78 and 80. 

1000x500px-LL-362270e9_olingroup.jpg

 

Early to mid 80s belonged to the K2 710, 810, and VOs

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1XFO1Xg8HRL7ezExUPZM_n9anIcErBwxIUm48HoIXeeSU_eSa6t8kvAS5Hw

 

Sure, a lot of racers were on Rossis and Dynastars, but I recall the K2s and Olins being novel and the hot new thing to get back then.

 

Honorable mention to hart Freestyle.  Who liked to hit the jumps and never had a pair of those?

 

 

And final honorable mention to......................

 

ski_package_hart_lange_besser_30_8516638.jpg

 

Yep, how come nobody remembers the beginner skis in these discussions?  Those are even complete with the plastic disaster Besser bindings.  I had 202s on my Gremlinssmile.gif

 

 

 

post #314 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

 

 

My thoughts in red along with a thumb if I agree or disagree. My opinion and YMMV. I am not saying any of these skis aren't good but I am looking in the context of the thread. 

 

This got me thinking about another view that has not been discussed in this thread. popcorn.gif

 

But wouldn't popularity have a significant impact on a ski's impact,not just design?    In other words other ski's may of helped build a ski, but it's really the one that gets all the press and sells that actually makes an influence.  

post #315 of 332

 


Vincent van Gogh sold one (or maybe three) paintings in his lifetime.      The total number of Van Gogh sales in history is dwarfed by the number of Jack Vettriano sales (and he's still alive).   Which is more influential?

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

But wouldn't popularity have a significant impact on a ski's impact,not just design?    In other words other ski's may of helped build a ski, but it's really the one that gets all the press and sells that actually makes an influence.  

 


I

post #316 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by cantunamunch View Post

 


Vincent van Gogh sold one (or maybe three) paintings in his lifetime.      The total number of Van Gogh sales in history is dwarfed by the number of Jack Vettriano sales (and he's still alive).   Which is more influential?

 

 

 


I

 

I'm just saying the Mantra was a great ski (still is), but the Gotama got all the rave and had a full rocker instead of regular camber, so which would be more important.  The mantra with regular camber or the Gotama with full rocker and a different flex from tip to tail.    I really don't know anything about art so....  :) 

post #317 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by ogranitechief View Post

Ok for my old to new school picks
The Ski-The quintessential bump ski from the 70's. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
Hexcels- Honeycomb aircraft construction that never took off. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
K2 cheeseburgers- A great beam of a ski, but not important. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
Rossi SM- The first GS ski that was real friendly and VERY important. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif" rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
Rossi 7s- 4S yes " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif 7S no " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
Rossi 3m- Do you mean the 4M, bump ski? either way, No" rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
K2 TNC- A GS ski with cool graphics, non race graphics. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
K2 Mod X Pro- No. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
Rossi Bandit series- Not a fan of these skis...at all..but they did create a good series segment. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
Solomon Course and Equipe 9000- The First REAL monocoque skis ever offered that made other manufactures completely redesign their lines. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif" rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
Volant Chubbs- The first FAT ski that made people realize that fat skis are not just for powder. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
Volkl Gotama-  I will give you the upcoming Manta, the Gotama rode on it's coat tails. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon13.gif">icon13.gif
Dynastar Big- OK ski but not important. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif
And the piste' de resistant Volkl Mantra- Still the ski some compare all 98 waisted skis against. " rel="/img/vbsmilies/smilies/icon14.gif">icon14.gif

Not in the best of order just as they popped in my head and are skis that influenced me and my early " extreme skiing" buddies of the early squaw valley rippers of the mid 80's Like Scmidt, Day, Plake the flake from south lake, Andrews and the like,

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

Armada JJ- So many more important skis before the JJ ever was introduced. icon13.gif

Gotama- See in above quote. 

Both very different and influential in the transition of full rockered and tip and tail rockered ski market.  

 

 

My thoughts in red along with a thumb if I agree or disagree. My opinion and YMMV. I am not saying any of these skis aren't good but I am looking in the context of the thread. 

 

This got me thinking about another view that has not been discussed in this thread. popcorn.gif


Well you have some good points here but all the red makes me feel like I'm getting graded in school again LOL the mod x pros ugly, yes but very influential in my life and many others. They really solidified the staple of shape skis and defined what a performance mid fat was (not so mid by today's standards) and who can say no to MOD technology. I thought I might throw an influential boot in the mix as well, Nordica Polaris knee high rear entry acl ripper bump skiers just loved them I shoveled a lot of drive ways to get some and my parents threw in a pair of K2 proflex bump skis and a pair of Look Nevada bindings and Roffe neoprene stretch pants with integrated gators . That Equipement let me enjoy skiing without having to be crammed in to my trappuer racing boots ( stiff as nails) and super stiff Volkl rentigers oh wait VOLKL RENTIGERS how did I forget those things took me to the next level on the school race team. Then I started hanging out with the wrong crowd Palmer and Plake according to my principal and guidance counselor. Well enough of memory lane.
post #318 of 332

Phil, I can't figure out your Gotama comment. You should go back and actually read the reviews of the first Goats. No coat tails. It was perceived as a very different ski than the Mantra from the get go, aimed at different skiers, and it in no way shape or form borrowed anything in the way of construction or design. So ????

post #319 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by beyond View Post

Phil, I can't figure out your Gotama comment. You should go back and actually read the reviews of the first Goats. No coat tails. It was perceived as a very different ski than the Mantra from the get go, aimed at different skiers, and it in no way shape or form borrowed anything in the way of construction or design. So ????

 

yea I was scratching my head on that one as well,  The gotama is a Completely different ski, full rocker, and different flex zones etc....   I have skied both and the are not even close to the same ski.  

post #320 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

 

 

yea I was scratching my head on that one as well,  The gotama is a Completely different ski, full rocker, and different flex zones etc....   I have skied both and the are not even close to the same ski.  

 

 

The Mantra had the halo marketing power that allowed Volkl to  penetrate the market with the Got - skiers were prepared to listen to why they might want the Got instead of the Mantra because they trusted the reputation of the Mantra as a stiff, performance, fat ski.     Hence, coat tails.

post #321 of 332
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by beyond View Post

Phil, I can't figure out your Gotama comment. You should go back and actually read the reviews of the first Goats. No coat tails. It was perceived as a very different ski than the Mantra from the get go, aimed at different skiers, and it in no way shape or form borrowed anything in the way of construction or design. So ????

 

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

 

 

yea I was scratching my head on that one as well,  The gotama is a Completely different ski, full rocker, and different flex zones etc....   I have skied both and the are not even close to the same ski.  

 

I am not talking about the current Gotama's. The first Goats were pretty much on the coat tails of the early Mantra's, they were a full camber bigger version of the Mantras. The more recent Goats being full rocker are so different than the early ones, they almost could have a different name. I do think an argument could be made that the early Goats were influential and it is a very valid argument and it is VERY compelling and since these are all opinions, it could be hard to argue against, 

post #322 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

 

 

 

 

 

I am not talking about the current Gotama's. The first Goats were pretty much on the coat tails of the early Mantra's, they were a full camber bigger version of the Mantras. The more recent Goats being full rocker are so different than the early ones, they almost could have a different name. I do think an argument could be made that the early Goats were influential and it is a very valid argument and it is VERY compelling and since these are all opinions, it could be hard to argue against, 

Well those were the only goats I was talking bout. :)     How about my old Dynastar Assault verticals. :) 

 

post #323 of 332
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdiddy View Post

 How about my old Dynastar Assault verticals. :) 

 

 

They were very good bump skis even when they evolved into the V9. The Vertical was probably the lightest of the big player bump skis back in the day, Rossi 4M/7M, Atomic 533CE are some that come to mind. They earn a icon14.gif... beercheer.gif

post #324 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

 

 

They were very good bump skis even when they evolved into the V9. The Vertical was probably the lightest of the big player bump skis back in the day, Rossi 4M/7M, Atomic 533CE are some that come to mind. They earn a icon14.gif... beercheer.gif

 

Yes!     I skied them until they were literally missing several feet of edges on each side.  

post #325 of 332

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by cantunamunch View Post

 

 

 

The Mantra had the halo marketing power that allowed Volkl to  penetrate the market with the Got - skiers were prepared to listen to why they might want the Got instead of the Mantra because they trusted the reputation of the Mantra as a stiff, performance, fat ski.     Hence, coat tails.

 

the mantra rode the coat tails of the explosive and g4, and really was in essence the combination of the 2 (flex pattern and sidecut of g4 + width of explosive)... which reminds me, that the g4 should be included in this thread, somewhere or another.  

post #326 of 332

Every market is different but here is a list of skis (or series of skis) roughly in sequential order that were important in our shop:

 

Rossignol FP/SM

Rossignol 4Sk - wow, couldn't ski anywhere without stepping on Teal skis in lift lines.

Volkl P9's

K2 Extreme

Salomon 9000 series original monocoque skis

Salomon Force 9 and Super Force models

Salomon X-Mountain then later the SuperMountain

K2 Four with shape and piezo - these skis legitimized the shape ski revolution

Head Cyber 20x & 24x - nearly as important as the Four's in legitimizing shapes

Volkl Snow Ranger -

Volant Power Karve - cult classic, if someone did a remake of this ski, we would sell a ton, even in today's market

Salomon X-Scream - probably just about as dominant in our market as the 4Sk in its day.

Rossignol Bandit Series - nearly all models and vintages

Volkl Vertigo Series  - again nearly all models and vintages

Fischer Watea 84 and 94

 

post #327 of 332
70's - Dynastar Omeglass
Early 80's - Dynastar Course 84 ?
80"s Rossi 4s
90's Salomon 9000
From a Scottish and European perspective !!
post #328 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuki View Post

My hands down nomination would have to be the Head Standard.

You no longer had to worry about warping and loss of flex or breakage. I can't even remember hearing about breaking a ski unless it flew off the roof.

As the first metal ski, it introduced the concept of using something other than steamed hickory and brought skiing out of the dark ages..... thanks to Howard Head

Is there a ski "museum" that would be worth a visit to (other than Phil's basement) somewhere in the east?

Phil, have you been to the PGA museum in Bedminster NJ?

I remember my Head Standards.  I still have the scar on my nose from the shovel of the right ski.  Stinkin' safety strap!  I beat the crap out of those boards.  Had the Olin IV's, too.  Learned to bump on em'.

post #329 of 332
Seventies,Rossignol ROC
Eighties,Volkl Renntiger
post #330 of 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

 

 

 

 

 

I am not talking about the current Gotama's. The first Goats were pretty much on the coat tails of the early Mantra's, they were a full camber bigger version of the Mantras. The more recent Goats being full rocker are so different than the early ones, they almost could have a different name. I do think an argument could be made that the early Goats were influential and it is a very valid argument and it is VERY compelling and since these are all opinions, it could be hard to argue against, 


But ..... didn't the first Goats (black w/silver Buddha, squared off twin tip tail) come out a year or two before the first Mantra?  Pretty sure I picked up a pair of those Goats and a couple pair of the last Explosives (plumb w/silver Buddha) at the same time ('02? '03?), so not sure who was on who's coattails smile.gif

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Most Important skis of the decades