or Connect
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Dynastar Cham 97 HM x Cham 2.0 97
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dynastar Cham 97 HM x Cham 2.0 97

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 

Hi

 

I've seen this year with Cham 2.0 there is no HM version, but also looking at pictures and specs it seems the Cham 2.0 97 and Cham 97 HM are very very similar (same lengths and sidecuts), but lots of reviews says the "tail of 2.0 is softer and its a friendlier ski"

 

 

Original Cham reports to have flat tails, while the 2.0 says "tail rocker", although a lot of people says the rocker is minimal.

 

So:

1) Are they from the same mold?

2) What are the differences? Just flex pattern of the tail?

 

 

Cheers

 

 

Cookie


Edited by IceCookie - 2/25/16 at 7:40am
post #2 of 2

I have skied both skis and from what I could tell, they were the same.  I liked them both very much.  I could not feel a difference in the tails, doesn't mean there is no difference, just that I could not feel it.  I skied the 187cm.  I am 5'9" 170lbs.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Dynastar Cham 97 HM x Cham 2.0 97