Not even close to what was suggested in the previous post. See: http://www.parkrecord.com/ci_28459377/3-2-vote-county-stays-accord
This is all contentious, and has a long way to go. There are many studies to be done first. The county simply wants a say in any future deal.
The other issue is correctly described here and not in the previous post : http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/commissioners-ask-mountain-accord-to-delete-county-inclusion-in-land/article_82a36595-96ca-52c0-a017-661766bd3d58.html
All of this has a long way to go before anything happens or doesn't happen.
Edited by quant2325 - 7/10/15 at 7:15am