or Connect
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Member Gear Reviews › Review: 2016 Stockli Stormrider 95 183cm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Review: 2016 Stockli Stormrider 95 183cm - Page 2

post #31 of 33

Anyone here A-B the 2016 SR 95 in a 183 with the 2016 Bonafide in a 180? I have skied two days on the 180 Bone, and really loved it, but remember my last pair of skis, the 2004-5 SS Stormrider  in a 186cm and what a rocket it was.... 

 

I am 5-11, 165lbs, 61yo, skiing 52 years, looking for the holy grail ski that can slice, dice, slide, carve, float, and take an occasional trip through the bumps, preferably with 10" of fresh on top!

post #32 of 33
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_eleven View Post
 

Anyone here A-B the 2016 SR 95 in a 183 with the 2016 Bonafide in a 180? I have skied two days on the 180 Bone, and really loved it, but remember my last pair of skis, the 2004-5 SS Stormrider  in a 186cm and what a rocket it was.... 

 

I am 5-11, 165lbs, 61yo, skiing 52 years, looking for the holy grail ski that can slice, dice, slide, carve, float, and take an occasional trip through the bumps, preferably with 10" of fresh on top!

 

 

Edgehold: equivalent on both skis: SR95 is more progressive engagement, works much better on tip in for scarving and brushing turns. Bonafide is very on-off; feels more aggressive and "edgier" but can be too much, like a car set up with suspension that is too stiff and aggressive, wanting to oversteer.  

 

Junk snow: SR95 has the big edge in sweet spot, easy to stay centered. I have to drive the Bonafide more, it pushes back. 

 

Stability: SR95 has more stability in rough snow than the Bonafide, definitely the edge the faster you go.  More damp, smooth, snow hugging. Quicksilver on your feet. 

 

Slow speeds: the SR95 does slower drift and impact turns better than the Bone. Bone wants to lock and be more aggressive; you really have to stay on top of it.  

 

Bumps: SR95, no question, much more pliable tip, softer tail. 

 

Groomers: slight edge to the Bone: feels like a wide race ski, very aggressive lateral flex. 

 

soft snow float: wider, softer tip on the SR95 makes it feel 10mm wider than it's listed width.  The Bone skis true to width, not as floaty

 

Snowfeel: again, Bone is more aggressive, you feel the speed if you are going fast.   SR95 is deceptively smooth: feels like you aren't going very fast, like driving a BMW M6.  Feels like you are doing 65, till you look at the speedo and see 130mph.  

 

 

post #33 of 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgcatching View Post


Edgehold: equivalent on both skis: SR95 is more progressive engagement, works much better on tip in for scarving and brushing turns. Bonafide is very on-off; feels more aggressive and "edgier" but can be too much, like a car set up with suspension that is too stiff and aggressive, wanting to oversteer.  

Junk snow: SR95 has the big edge in sweet spot, easy to stay centered. I have to drive the Bonafide more, it pushes back. 

Stability: SR95 has more stability in rough snow than the Bonafide, definitely the edge the faster you go.  More damp, smooth, snow hugging. Quicksilver on your feet. 

Slow speeds: the SR95 does slower drift and impact turns better than the Bone. Bone wants to lock and be more aggressive; you really have to stay on top of it.  

Bumps: SR95, no question, much more pliable tip, softer tail. 

Groomers: slight edge to the Bone: feels like a wide race ski, very aggressive lateral flex. 

soft snow float: wider, softer tip on the SR95 makes it feel 10mm wider than it's listed width.  The Bone skis true to width, not as floaty

Snowfeel: again, Bone is more aggressive, you feel the speed if you are going fast.   SR95 is deceptively smooth: feels like you aren't going very fast, like driving a BMW M6.  Feels like you are doing 65, till you look at the speedo and see 130mph.  


Interesting. Note I think we are quite a bit different In Terms of size, and I think I am a bit more of a "pusher" in the turns than you...

I find the bonafide at my size to not have the same amount of raw firm power, but rather that kind of "on off" power you mention. The bonafide for me is quite a bit sketchier and not as damp either.

To me, the Stockli is just a better all around ski...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Member Gear Reviews
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Member Gear Reviews › Review: 2016 Stockli Stormrider 95 183cm