or Connect
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ask the Boot Guys › Nordica Aggressor model differences
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Nordica Aggressor model differences

post #1 of 3
Thread Starter 

Hi guys,

 

I searched and tried to find more info on 130 and 150 Dobie Aggressor. Is there a difference in the density of the plastic between the 130 and 150 aggressor? Do 130 and 150 aggressor share the same last and lower cuff height? I own both pairs, but I don't see many differences, except the thicker boot board in the 150s and unnoticeable softer flex of the 130s. Any info on these boots will be greatly appreciated.

 

I'm aware of the differences between the 130Pro and 150WC, 98 vs. 95mm last, identical lower cuff height, please correct me if I'm wrong. Since these are older boots, I'm not able to find the difference in specs.

 

Thanks in advance

post #2 of 3

150 vs 130 is the flex,  mostly the plastic density but also an extra bolt installed on the rear cuff?  can't remember, but yes,  stiffer and same shape.

 

pro vs wc is the shape at 98 vs 95mm

post #3 of 3

From virtually all companies, maybe all, when you are talking about the same model as in Raptor 115 vs 130, or Scorpion 100 vs 110 you are talking about identically lasted boots with different plastic in the shell.

 

Lou

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ask the Boot Guys
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ask the Boot Guys › Nordica Aggressor model differences