Yep - can't agree with you any more on Vail's intent to operate a ski resort on the land they have leased from Talisker. But you still have not offered any proof at all that Vail has publicly stated that they expect to able to do that for the 14/15 season. I guess you just don't get not so subtle distinctions. Have another beer and make another (hopefully different) observation.
Nothing subtle about "ABSOLUTE" and for the timing, when "COURT RULES", it just did. I think you're bit defensive (and a bit rude) over not remembering Katz's clear statements of intent and timing.
Maybe if Cummings agrees to pay Vail's 2012, 2013 and 2014 rent of $22M per year, Katz will let him operate it one more year. $66M for a last waltz with Jupiter Bowl sounds steep but billionaires have options others don't.