My Son overtook my MX 88s ,
SOOO here is what I noticed about them compared to My Atomic Smoke Tis ..
I am a moderate intermediate skier , The Atomic edge on Snoqualmie concrete ten times better than the MX 88s , I am not sure what people mean by ,, MX 88s edge one hard pack /ice , My son test drove the Atomics and told me ...." this is what these Atomics are made for , I was on MY/ Now His MX 88s , I thought they Were terrible on hard pack / ice , so we traded back , He made slippy carves and I on the Atomics carved , these two skis really don't do much the same , The atomics get wobbly if I go straight down a blue, steep blue Border line black , I have to turn and be in some sort of a carve on the Atomics , The MX 88s .... I can go straight and they stay stable till I chicken out and turn to slow down a little .. Then I have some B94 Rossi , They are great for mixed crud soft snow and dry powder . but they submarine and wipe me out in the Crystal mount ,spring wet powder , Soo The meaning of the question ... I saw some guys up there wih some BIG powder planks . Like 104 mm waist [they said] But that really isn't that much bigger than my Rossi 94 mm waist ,so Back to the meaning of the question , Do you think The B94s are inferior to these wide planks I see these guys on > Or Inferior by a WHOLE lot , Or a little inferior ,
, Snoqualmie Washington hardly justifies more than a hard pack ski ,or a Middle ski like the B94 . Snoqualmie gets skied down pretty quick , Powder doesn't last long , I ski crystal 8 times a year maybe ,My issue ,, I don't care what they try to say about the Atomic smoke with the rocker tip ,, they DO NOT ski powder , I know I need more skis , More fishing rods and on and on , But Really , Do I need much more than a B94 for ?