Not only Yes, but I would prefer the gov't arm the crack, smack, and meth users with full-auto assault weapons! Just think how exciting walking your dog in the city would be!!!
I have a question for you now.
You're skiing down the hill when you notice another skier without a helmet standing alongside...no...in the middle of the trail. Outraged, you turn to chastise the ne'er-do-well for his irresponsible recklessness. While doing so, you stop watching where you're going and plunge off a 100' cliff, breaking both legs into 927 pieces. Ski Patrol arrives quicker than you can say "Get a helmet on , Loser!", and horror of horrors, none of the hypocritical bad examples are wearing helmets!
So, do you stand by your convictions and refuse their aid, lest your association with them imply any sort of approval of their disgraceful shunning of helmets?
OR...do you let it go this one time and accept their aid? If you do, isn't there a term for one who disapproves of another, yet accepts some sort of benefit from that person?
Lessee, what is it....hypnotic? No...uh, hypodermic? No, no, it's...uh...hypochondriac? No, no, no, that's not it! Oh well, it'll come to me....