New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Atomic Automatic 186

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 

Atomic Automatic 186 review (140-117-129, 19m TR)

 

5’11”, 190, athletic

 

Bindings: Sollie demo with fixed toepiece, so my 325 BSL might have put my boot center ~1cm back from the recommended mount line.

 

Location:  Alpine Meadows, variable day-after snow, off piste except to get to the lifts.

 

Skis (somewhat) like it that I've been on recently: Wailer 112RP 190, Gunsmoke 186, Head Inferno 181, Blizzard Cochise 185.

 

Pros:  Powerful, quick, non-finicky*; giggle-inducing.

 

Cons:  Still thinking…

 

Wow!  They felt like an extension of me, I was at home on them from the first run.  I have read loads of reviews that claim “this Bdizzle MegaFat (twin-tipped, with a supersidecut!) slays in every condition!” with a lot of skepticism, and groaned when reading that last year’s gotta-have-it ski is now an obsolete death trap compared to this year’s shiny new thingee.  I’ll be a little less quick to judge next time, I couldn’t find anything to harsh the mellow I had with these shiny new 117mm thingees.  I will probably have a pair of very new and very yellow 112mm skis for sale to make room in the quiver for these sticks.

 

Power:  Check.  They’re burly enough to hold on to steeps, chutes, and some icy, skied-off bits I couldn’t see until I was on them.  Variable snow felt nicely smoothed-out at speed, and the tails were pleasing when putting down the landing gear.

 

Quick:  Double check.  As well as they held, they also let me turn left or right at the speed of thought.  I was taking more chances (than the Infernos I had just been on) at getting through trees and other tight spots because they always seemed to pointing through the middle of the gap by the time I got to it.  They’re the quickest >110mm skis edge-to-edge I’ve been on so far, I found myself intuitively weaving through unexpected bony spots like a section of fall-line gates in a slalom course (Alpine was skiing great, but could still use a few more feet of coverage).  These skis inspire daring-do.

 

*Non-finicky: Yup.  This ski has an organic feel, in that it adapts to the user.  Any way I wanted to ski (to include tired and sloppy), it worked with me without making me pay for not skiing centered/driving the tips/awesome/whatever.  I didn’t get to experiment due to the fixed demo toepiece, but what I felt jives with other folks’ experience with the Automatic accommodating various fore/aft mount points.

 

I’d like to try the 193; if it doesn’t feel much less wieldy (shouldn’t, given my height/weight/general love of garlic on anything), I’ll take the extra anti-tip dive and bump smoothing, even though the 186 felt pretty ideal in those areas.  This ski is so agreeable, the aforementioned non-finickyness hopefully extends to sizing up as well.  If not, the 186 it is.

 

But do they ‘rail groomers like a race ski’?  Of course not (my new 165 SLs do, however; yeehaw).  However, when I got to the bottom of the very first run and hit the groomed right before the lift, I discovered I was still having fun, rather than just surviving or feeling awkward.  B+ on hard snow, and best fatty I’ve been on so far for that; this could be the one ski someone takes with them on a trip out west if they’re a pow optimist that wants to hedge ever so slightly, or for a local that doesn’t want to miss out on a run to head back to the car for a swap in the afternoon.

 

After trying the Automatic for the day, I am sold on A) the Automatic, and B) demoing a ski before buying if at all possible.  I had one of my best days on skis at Alpine that day.

 

Analogy:  This is the significant other that brings out the best in you and doesn’t expect you to change, even appreciates your quirky attempts to spice things up a bit; it’s not every day you meet one like this…

post #2 of 2
Great review. Sounds like love.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Member Gear Reviews