EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › Ski Training and Pro Forums › Ski Instruction & Coaching › MA Just for fun.. Squaw, 4-16-2012
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MA Just for fun.. Squaw, 4-16-2012 - Page 2

post #31 of 66

From myself:

Quote:

I'd say you're leaning uphill too much.  Some more knee angulation might help bring your upper body over your skis more.  Try to get your hips and shoulders closer to directly above your skis instead of so far up the hill from your skis. 

 

Your weight is on your uphill ski too often (partially because your leaning uphill too much).  Switch your weight to the uphill ski only at the exact moment that you pole plant so your unweighting can be driven from that ski. 

 

From dchan:

     Quote:

where my hips are in relation to my feet may be a visual trick making it seem like I'm more back than you think.

 

 

I think you may have misunderstood me.  I am not saying that your hips are too far in the direction of the tails of your skis.  I am not saying that you are simply in the backseat.  I am saying that when your skis are going accross the hill, your hips are too much up the hill to the side of your skis.  I am confident that what I am seeing is not an illusion.  If it is it's a really awesome one.  LOL

 

I can see it in every turn.  This picture shows it:

 

307x230px-LL-c74b18b3_dchan4.jpg

 

Again, I am not saying that your butt is too far in the direction of your tails, but that your hips are too far to the uphill side of your skis.  Part of the problem is that you're really straight-legged instead of angulated.  Being straight-legged like that means that if your skis are on edge, your hip will be too far uphill. 

 

That picture also shows you with too much weight on your uphill ski.  The spray of snow over your downhill foot proves it. 


Edited by Blake Saunders - 5/6/12 at 1:17am
post #32 of 66

Good assessment Saunders. He can't get more downhill ski engagement in his current alignment.

post #33 of 66

I think Rusty's got the location correct.  Here's the relevant detail of the 2001 map.  It's pretty murky.

 

SquawComplex2.jpg

Find the cure for ordinary - Squaw Valley

Reply
post #34 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRusty View Post

http://www.squaw.com/the-mountain/trail-map

 

squaw_trail_toms_maybe.png

In the circled are maybe?

Yes, this is the Tom's Tumble area.  

Find the cure for ordinary - Squaw Valley

Reply
post #35 of 66

Look at the angle at the ankle in these two screen shots.  What do you think?  How stiff are these boots?  What's the effective forward lean with the toe lift plates you've installed?Screen shot 2012-05-08 at 7.47.14 PM.pngScreen shot 2012-05-08 at 7.47.43 PM.png

post #36 of 66
Thread Starter 

Boots are Salomon x3 Rc custom Flex rating is 130

 

If you measure from the front of the shin (bar along the tongue of the boot) The forward lean on that boot is about 21.5 degrees with that toe lift. Remove the toe lift and it's about 24 degrees.

 

Without the toe lift, my knee is just about where the front of the boot is. With the toe lift, my knee is just about over the ball of my foot. put me in my skis and with the delta of the binding, my knee is just over my toes.

 

In those images I would have to say I'm probably cuff neutral or pretty close to it. The outside foot may be just starting to pressure the tips..I am certainly not flexing those boots much if at all at that point. In that snow if I pressured the tips much, I probably would have had a tip dive in..

post #37 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Saunders View Post


Again, I am not saying that your butt is too far in the direction of your tails, but that your hips are too far to the uphill side of your skis.  Part of the problem is that you're really straight-legged instead of angulated.  Being straight-legged like that means that if your skis are on edge, your hip will be too far uphill. 


It's a very steep slope, Blake.
post #38 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneale Brownson View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Saunders View Post


Again, I am not saying that your butt is too far in the direction of your tails, but that your hips are too far to the uphill side of your skis.  Part of the problem is that you're really straight-legged instead of angulated.  Being straight-legged like that means that if your skis are on edge, your hip will be too far uphill. 
 

It's a very steep slope, Blake.


^And you want to have more angulation and separation.

post #39 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by slider View Post


^And you want to have more angulation and separation.

Yes I do.
post #40 of 66

I think that is what Blake and Liquid were trying to point out. If your upper body does not have the correct movements and path down the fall line then your lower body can not provide leverage advantage. Not belittling you or boasting my skill level,just trying to help. Which helps me too. It takes courage,commitment and unwavering faith in your technique. Your prolly skiing a double black and I prolly would not even attempt it. eek.gif

post #41 of 66
Thread Starter 
Several of the candidates were clearly out of their comfort zones on that run. It was steeper than it looks in those videos.

Slider,

Glad the comments are helping you.
post #42 of 66

I guess it is a significant advantage for candidates that are from Squaw in this case

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post

Several of the candidates were clearly out of their comfort zones on that run. It was steeper than it looks in those videos.
Slider,
Glad the comments are helping you.
post #43 of 66
I don't think it's particularly an advantage for Squaw skiers--although it's always nice to know the terrain--as much as it's an advantage for folks who routinely ski similar chutes.
post #44 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneale Brownson View Post

I don't think it's particularly an advantage for Squaw skiers--although it's always nice to know the terrain--as much as it's an advantage for folks who routinely ski similar chutes.

I agree. I am not a Squaw skier, but I trained for the probability that we would ski in those contitions.
post #45 of 66

Dchan,

 

What does your calf muscle circumference measure at the top of the liner? (inches or mm)

 

What is the forward lean of your boot when you measure it (in millimeters) from a vertical line placed behind the heel of the boot.

(place the boot in a door frame and measure to the liner at the top of the rear of the shell .)

 

A. If you boots have more forward lean

B. or if you have a larger calf,

C. or both of the above

 

your knee will be pushed forward to a point where you can not load your heels

without pushing on the back of the boot cuff with your calf.  You will sit back in order to get off of the front of your skis.

Also indicated by the need to step some turns.

 

mike


Edited by miketsc - 5/9/12 at 9:40am
post #46 of 66

From Kneale Brownson:

Quote:

It's a very steep slope, Blake.

 

Can we at least agree that he is on his uphill ski here (and in other turns):

 

307x230px-LL-c74b18b3_dchan4.jpg

 

That is basically all I am saying.  So far I have made 2 points: 1 is that his hips are too far up the hill and 2 is that his weight is on his uphill ski.... I said this like it was 2 seperate points, but really it's the same point.  Because it's the same thing.  Either his hips are too far up the hill because he's on his uphill ski // or he's on his uphill ski because his hips are too far up the hill.  Same thing. 

 

The angulation issue that ties into this is a body position thing.  It relates to the problem as well. He is bent forward at the waist with straight legs rather than using his angulation to get his body more in the direction of his skis. 

 

I can't figure out how to pull a picture from the video which is why I am using a picture someone else pulled.  The best example I see to prove my point is the picture that is on the video as the front page of the video before you press play.  It looks to me that he is close to falling onto his hip on that turn.  Here, don't press play, just look at the picture on it: 

 

post #47 of 66
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Saunders View Post
 I am confident that what I am seeing is not an illusion.  If it is it's a really awesome one.  LOL

While I will agree that I do get weight on that uphill ski from time to time, I started to wonder if it really is an illusion. I went through all the video of the other people heading down that slope including the last 2 guys I posted for reference. Using the rocks and the pattern on the rocks as well as knowing where the video was taken from, I would say it's a bit steeper than it appears. In my video particularly I would say the camera is tilted (not level) and the fact that it is from a vantage point a little above the chute at it's narrowest makes it look even less steep.

 

I will try to "adjust the tilt" or level of the video when I get a chance using the average from all the other videos to get a better perspective of the pitch on that slope.

 

I think it will show a different picture. I do agree with your assessment of me getting "too much" weight on that uphill ski from time to time. I would love to find out if our examiner took more video on the second day. Wondering if some of that went away as I began to focus more on certain aspects of the skiing.

 

DC

post #48 of 66

I have heard, read, and experienced that it can be advantageous to ski soft conditions with a two-footed approach.  In this sense, wet spring conditions are skied similarly to powder, with a 50-50 weight distribution.  Could that be what's going on here?

Find the cure for ordinary - Squaw Valley

Reply
post #49 of 66
Thread Starter 
Nice thought Xela.

While a little more two footed might have been a little helpful, I could have been a more long leg/short leg on that run. On that steep of a pitch the only time my legs should have been the same length is right at the transition.

More even pressure does not necessarily mean less angulation or counter. Touch and feel. What I will still be working on for a while..

Dc
Edited by dchan - 5/9/12 at 2:53pm
post #50 of 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Saunders View Post

From Kneale Brownson:

Can we at least agree that he is on his uphill ski here (and in other turns):

307x230px-LL-6759b547_307x230px-LL-c74b18b3_dchan4.jpeg

That is basically all I am saying.  So far I have made 2 points: 1 is that his hips are too far up the hill and 2 is that his weight is on his uphill ski.... I said this like it was 2 seperate points, but really it's the same point.  Because it's the same thing.  Either his hips are too far up the hill because he's on his uphill ski // or he's on his uphill ski because his hips are too far up the hill.  Same thing. 

The angulation issue that ties into this is a body position thing.  It relates to the problem as well. He is bent forward at the waist with straight legs rather than using his angulation to get his body more in the direction of his skis. 

I can't figure out how to pull a picture from the video which is why I am using a picture someone else pulled.  The best example I see to prove my point is the picture that is on the video as the front page of the video before you press play.  It looks to me that he is close to falling onto his hip on that turn.  Here, don't press play, just look at the picture on it: 



You have not made two points, Blake. You have stated two opinions.

We all agree he has weight on the uphill ski in the photo instant you picked on. He also is in the process of starting his right turn there. I'd rather see a little more flex in the left ankle and knee, but whatever he was doing, it was getting him down the slope in control at a steady pace.

We disagree that his hips are "too far uphill". His weight most likely, because of slope steepness, is pretty much over his feet. His skis do not slide out from under him. He did not fall onto his hip nor onto his face. It was gooey, wet snow on a really steep slope and he went offensively mostly from turn to turn.
post #51 of 66
Thread Starter 

This edited version was done using the patterns on the rocks in the background for reference. All of the other skiers that went by that I was able to see that vertical bit of snow, showed that the camera was held at quite a different pitch or angle. I set the angle for my run closer to theirs. Looking at the sign up at the top of the run also gives an idea that the camera was held at a flatter angle as well.

 

 

 

post #52 of 66

From Kneale Brownson:

 

Quote:

You have not made two points, Blake. You have stated two opinions.

We all agree he has weight on the uphill ski in the photo instant you picked on.  He also is in the process of starting his turn right there.   

 

 

Ok, so you want to debate the subject of english now?  I thought an 'opinion' could be a 'point'.  Where is my dictionary....

 

Also, I am not "picking on" anyone or any thing.  The OP asked for an MA and got one, that's all.  I assume if someone asks for one it means they want one. 

 

The OP did not react defensively towards anything I said, so it's hard for me to understand why anyone else would when the OP was the only person I was talking to.  I'm starting to think I should make my avatar a target.  I do not understand many of the reactions I get on this forum. 

 

If no one is trying to react defensively, fine, but it seems that way to me.

 

From Kneale Brownson:

 

Quote:

He also is in the process of starting his right turn there.

 

Then back the video up a couple seconds and see the same thing. 


Edited by Blake Saunders - 5/9/12 at 9:05pm
post #53 of 66

From dchan

Quote:
While I will agree that I do get weight on that uphill ski from time to time, I started to wonder if it really is an illusion. I went through all the video of the other people heading down that slope including the last 2 guys I posted for reference. Using the rocks and the pattern on the rocks as well as knowing where the video was taken from, I would say it's a bit steeper than it appears.

 

I don't see how steepness would affect what I'm seeing.  Even if I assume it's the steepest run I've ever seen, I don't see how that would change anything. 

 

I watched the new tilted video and see the same thing. 

 

If we don't agree let's just leave it at that.  It doesn't matter.  I don't feel like debating anymore. 

 

I like your intensity in your style as I said before. 

post #54 of 66
ok, guys, that run is not that steep. I ski it all the time, and it's maybe 40 degrees.
post #55 of 66

I appreciate you guys respecting my wishes to not have a runaway debate.  I think this forum would be nicer if everyone (including myself due to my irritability) made that effort more often. 

 

I don't plan on breaking my own idea about that with this post... I saw rod9301's post and this run came to mind because he mentioned degrees.  I heard this backcountry run is 50-55 degrees.  I don't know if that's right, and I haven't skied the run you guys are on, so I don't know what's steeper.  This was the steepest run I did all year though. 

 

Here are some shots of it I pulled from the video I did this year.  Let's just call this "different" shall we?  Not better, not worse, because it's neither of those things... just "different" body position.  If we could think about things like that there'd probably be a lot less "shoulds" and "shouldn'ts" on these threads.  Those words don't make a lot of sense here anyway when you take into consideration the fact there is not much reason to ski in the first place other than for enjoyment.  If you're enjoying, you're doing it "right". 

 

EXc2.jpg

 

EXd.jpg


Edited by Blake Saunders - 5/12/12 at 10:04pm
post #56 of 66

I didn't read all the other posts so I apologize if I'm repeating.

 

Nice skiing Dchan.

 

You are certainly gripping more than the other two... although their skidding is allowing them to maintain a bit more in the fall line which is not a bad tactic for steeper chutes... especially if this were a bit narrower.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dchan View Post

 

I also notice in this clip, that on almost every transition from my right turn going into my left turn, I "REALLY" lighten or even pickup my left ski a bit as I move to the new outside ski. Some of this may be me really trying to "get on that new outside ski sooner" but as I think about the "sequence" of events in my head, I am thinking that this might be more a symptom of something else going on.. If I am not strong with that "inside half" as I finish a turn so that it already moving towards the apex of my next turn, I may be getting "blocked" during the transition and thus unable to move my COM "over and down" the hill as cleanly. The move to extend and balance against the new outside ski may be a little premature to my COM actually heading across the skis and towards the new turn.

 

Yep, I agree with you here... Commit to going down the hill and allow your center of mass to topple into the new turn.... then you can worry about creating pressure on the new outside ski.

post #57 of 66
Thread Starter 
There's that interesting concept I've been struggling with. Working on it still.

"Topple into the new turn" or down the hill.

I like it. Just have not got it cemented in my muscle memory. When I get it right! biggrin.gif
post #58 of 66

DC,

 

There are two drills I have for this:

1) a static drill where you are standing across the hill and draw a circle in the snow with your downhill pole. Draw it as far down the hill as you can from where you are standing. Then take one side step up the hill. Now try to do a pole touch where you touch the tip into the circle. The idea is that you must launch into a release to be able to reach the circle.

 

2) make a turn on a blue/green (13-20 degree) run (a little speed helps) with a slight uphill start and with an extreme down the hill pole touch to initiate the edge change. Exaggerate the pole touch position from the above exercise. Reach so far down the hill that you reach the point where you feel you are going to fall (and get a "laid out" feeling). Magically, at this point the new edges engage and "catch" you. It makes a lousy turn, but really builds trust in the toppling movement.

post #59 of 66
We like to feel pressure under the new outside foot as we start turns, which makes it more difficult to "fall" into turns.

I like to work on riding the old outside ski into the new turn, at least past the edge release. A very mild version of the White Pass turn procedure where you don't actually take the new outside ski off the snow. I start by traversing on shallow terrain and doing a weighted edge release with the downhill ski, followed by returning to the uphill edge of that ski, making a garland of turn entries without moving weight to the uphill ski. WATCH FOR DOWNHILL TRAFFIC FROM ABOVE, and don't use the poles. Maintain a strong uphill side. Use the knee and ankle to release and reengage the edge. Then follow the same process on steeper and steeper terrain. Once you're comfortable with the release, add the pole reach and make turns.
post #60 of 66

Interesting stuff so far. I would love to share a though and an idea about releases on steeper terrain. So many folks mistakenly believe the release requires falling into the new turn like a sack of potatoes being thrown down the hill. Squatty Schuller talks about developing the greater lateral RoM in the hips and torso to move into the new turn, Barnes talks about this a bit differently and suggests the release is part of the transition but that the new turn starts well before the edge change. With that in mind I would offer the idea that the torso needs to move with the skis but the strong shaping phase will naturally occur later in the turn since the slope itself will make it difficult to create big edge angles prior to the fall line. I question why we would even want that considering how smeary the top of that new turn will be. Could it be that Dchan is in a pretty good stance? I would say so. What would I offer as an area of focus? The long leg, short leg idea but with a bit more focus on reaching with the pelvis (raising the inside hip / lowering the outside hip). That small change will produce a small change in effective inside "leg" length without dropping (or needing to drop) the inside hip quite so far into the turn, or turn the pelvis quite so far across the hill.

 

The last thought I want to offer is that while we want to be as relatively offensive as possible, an element of defensive speed control is present as well on steeper, narrower terrain. Smearing includes that mixed intent but through the transition I would say Dchan needs to shift slightly more towards the offensive end of the spectrum and leave the speed control to other parts of the turn (shaping phase).

 

That's a bit of a long winded way to say overall I like his turns and would suggest wholesale changes aren't needed.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Instruction & Coaching
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › Ski Training and Pro Forums › Ski Instruction & Coaching › MA Just for fun.. Squaw, 4-16-2012