A familiar face with a slightly "newer school" ( for him ;-) approach...
Uh oh. I heard "weight transfer", "one ski", and "heel thrust". Still, pretty smooth. Anything you do like about this?
Other than the threads, natch. 
A familiar face with a slightly "newer school" ( for him ;-) approach...
Uh oh. I heard "weight transfer", "one ski", and "heel thrust". Still, pretty smooth. Anything you do like about this?
Other than the threads, natch. 
Perfect hair, perfect tan, perfect shades, prefect corduroy, perfect straight ski technique. Ski like Stein!
I understand where TheRusty is coming from - a little too perfect overall - still, poetic seems about right. There is poetry in his motion, IMHO.
I wasn't trolling when I started this. Even though I know a narrow stance is not well thought of these days I thought perhaps there were other elements in his skiing that might be pointed out, and considered good. That sequence of turns from about :34-:40 - nothing to recommend there? Anything with what he's suggesting for pole plants?
Anyway, believe that clip in the thread starter is from maybe 10-12 years ago. Here's one from further back you may enjoy, Kneale...
This is rare footage of Stein Eriksen skiing at Boyne Mt. where he was ski school director from 1954 to 1956.
Everything! Beautiful turns. Perfect in every way.
Cool old footage jc , thx. Excellent time capsule. He looked like he was enjoying himself.
If it looks like a troll, talks like a troll and smells like a troll then it's at least just as good as one.
We don't ski this way any more. We don't teach this way any more. Stein's advice is appropriate for the era in which it was given, but not doing these things are some of the adjustments that we do with modern gear. You wouldn't use styling tips from a 55 Chevy to build a car today. Have you tried to ski on modern skis with your legs locked together? It doesn't work. But I still love Stein.
Thx for sharing that story, Kneale, and I hope you do get around to finding and digitizing some of your treasure trove! ;-)
I posted this clip in "Retro Memories...", but think it's worth placing here as well. A few short bits of classic Stein skiing, plus his ski/life philosophy resonates.
Not enough "O's" in Smooooth.... the man is a classic is all respects, and an example of how to continue living life to its fullest.

If it looks like a troll, talks like a troll and smells like a troll then it's at least just as good as one.
We don't ski this way any more. We don't teach this way any more. Stein's advice is appropriate for the era in which it was given, but not doing these things are some of the adjustments that we do with modern gear. You wouldn't use styling tips from a 55 Chevy to build a car today. Have you tried to ski on modern skis with your legs locked together? It doesn't work. But I still love Stein.
To your first point, a troll typically has mischievous or perhaps malevolent intent. Mine was simply to start a discussion to help me understand some things better. You, I, and apparently many others appreciate Stein's skiing, so maybe we can work forward from that.
Regarding the second set I acknowledged that "a narrow stance is not well thought of these days", and I also mentioned 'a slightly "newer school" ( for him ;-) approach' - in the clip in the thread starter Stein is not skiing with the exaggerated posture and shoulder rotations that typified the classic "Stein Turn". This is Stein maybe 12-15 years ago, not 50's Stein, and he is skiing on (relatively) modern gear (albeit on the skinny side).
What I see in the clip when he's making quick short turns is pretty much a quiet upper body continually facing down the fall line. Do you see it differently?
Setting aside the "narrow stance" consideration would you agree the description below provided by Kneale in another thread otherwise applies to what we're seeing in Stein's skiing?

jc,
Out of context, it was hard to tell if intent was mischievous. My comment about "as good as one" was referring to the bait nature of the post. So thanks for clarifying - that was the intent. You'll notice I won't engage in threads where the OP is not serious. We don't need to MA this clip. Stein is doing what he says he's doing. Nothing he is doing needs to be fixed because he is doing exactly what he wants to be doing. The question is "is his advice useful?" The answer, like many of the debates here on Epic, is "yes and no". It all depends on context.
It's not just the narrow stance. When you try to use the advice given in the clip as a whole, it's simply not useful for learning to ski on modern gear. We don't learn how to drive across the US from New York to LA by going to Maine, Miami, Anchorage, Dallas, Minnesota, then San Diego. We're much more likely to get lost that way. But once we have learned how to drive how across the states all those extra stops can provide useful additional information as additional "context".
I fondly remember a clinic where I was taught the Arlberg turn. Throwing your shoulders wildly was a horrible way to turn, even way back then on straight skis. But within the context of already knowing how to ski, it was a great learning experience to focus on how and why the technique worked. A couple years ago we were tasked in a clinic to ski with our legs locked together. I learned to ski this way so it was easy for me. Except that I could do it so well, the tips and the tails of my shaped skis would overlap each other. The other clinic participants marveled at how difficult it was to lock the legs together because the return on investment (ease of tipping) was more than offset by the loss of balance and loss of control.
Being able to control ones stance width within a half inch on command is an incredible talent and a useful skill. But it is not necessary for expert skiing. Merely attempting to control stance width is probably enough of a learning experience for most skiers, because recognition of inefficient stance width is the important skill. But this is stuff that talking about does not help much. You have to do it. So .... ski like Stein!
TR, appreciate you being open to restarting the discussion! I am interested in learning to identify and understand what's going on when watching people ski, and in that context I thought an analysis of Stein's skiing in the youtube clip would be a useful exercise.
Narrow stance aside, if we don't listen to but just look at "Stein 2000" skiing in the clip I'm guessing you don't have much of an issue with what's going on above the waist - upper body is pretty quiet and pointed down the hill for the most part. Shoulders dip a little during turns, but hands out front, easy wrist flick to pole plant. That's what I'm seeing. So far, so good?
Below the waist I see "up" movement to unweight the skis, followed by pivoting/steering, then finally (late in the turn) hard edge engagement, then quick pole plant - repeat - which seems to more or less map to Kneale's description (above). Am I missing something? Still good?
I know it's not uncommon for people here to see different things when they look at someone's skiing, so let me stop there and get your feedback.
JC,
You're not missing anything. Kneale has summed it up nicely.
For the most part I do see the one-footed skiing in Stein's and Killy's skiing, although (to me) it's subtle.
Otherwise, I think I'm often detecting those patterns - up/unweight, pivot/steer, engage edges, pole plant - when I watch people skiing bumps (not zipperline) and crud.
So I'm trying to reconcile that with "we don't ski this way anymore."
I acknowledge I am not seeing (in Crudology, for example) those patterns in a lot of cases - rather two-footed, tipping/carving, little or no up movement skiing.
I'll just continue to watch and try to digest what's really going on.
Appreciate your patience discussing this old subject matter - I'm sure it's been chewed on endlessly here before, even if not recently. ;-)
I still see people on straight skis skiing decent straight ski technique at my little home mountain every season. Pro bumpers like straight skis. Up unweight/pivot still works well in the bumps even on shaped skis. Heck, it can work well on the groomers. That does not make it the best choice. I often see little kids power wedging our bump run. "We" don't ski this way any more because there are less tiring and more fun ways to get down the mountain. Some skiers don't have those choices, but if they are having fun while they are working up a sweat it's all good.
If you learned to ski before shaped skis existed and you kept your straight skis, you can ski like this.
I had a student once who had taken a private lesson from Stein back in the day. The lesson, I gather, consisted of Stein taping the student's boots together with masking tape or something and then having the student follow him down the hill. The student had a wicked stem habit. so I'm guessing there were a few things in the man's skiing that Stein had overlooked. To be fair though I think most of my students who were from that era wanted to learn to ski with their feet together.
Funny, that's an old southern birth control method.
But I digress... ;-)
No comments on Stein 2000 in the gates? It is interesting to see him side by side with someone using a more modern style. He's certainly doing a lot more of this than she is...
Although interestingly if you look at the very beginning of the clip when they're freeskiing she's doing pretty much the same thing...
In general in the gates she seems to be staying glued with both feet to the snow and carving her turns, whereas Stein has a much more pronounced up move, turning his skis when they're off the snow (or at least very light) and then sinking down hard into the second half of the turn.
I know when they're skiing sync'd through the gates they're making pretty for the camera, not going full throttle, but still, his style in its own way seems smooth and effective.
Do you still see people skiing NASTAR with that older style? If so, are they competitive?
Anyway, in the spirit of the intent of the thread, that's what I'm seeing. You?

Her skis seem to be wider apart, but isn't that mainly a by-product of her higher edge angles, particularly on her outside ski?
LeMaster likes to do this to show how the skis are in some sense *not* that far apart...
But clearly the knees are, just as they would be if trying to stand on a steep slope.
And this is how she gets to that point...