EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Live from Jackson Hole: My Fischer Vacuum Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Live from Jackson Hole: My Fischer Vacuum Thread

post #1 of 59
Thread Starter 

First I want to plug my just-released book. Now on Kindle and in Amazon's Create Space in Print!

 

Ebook: $4.99 Print: $10.99 56 pages

 

ISBN# 9781475044126

 

First of numerous editions.

 

Priced like a magazine- awesome value for the information presented!

 

The Book on Ski Boots

 

What You Need To Know About Your Ski Boots

Save Your Vacation and Your Ski Season

 

New Front Cover 2 27 50 nook.jpg

                                                                                                                                Photo: Bob Peters

 

Not wanting to get lost in the volumes of (sometimes mis)information and mudslinging in the other thread, I have started my own. The other thread was a train wreck nearly from the start, and I pride myself on having viewed/seen very little of it. Enjoy!

 

My information and perspectives on the Fischer Vacuum is authentic and fresh.

 

I'm in the season 120+ days or so and I love my Fischer Vacuums. I've been skiing on two sets of Vacuums.

 

I've been sitting tight, collecting information on the Fischer Vacuum. I've molded a bunch of them, and have gotten quite good at getting them to fit a lot of different feet.

 

IMG_1593.JPG

 

First off, it's still a good stiff boot at the end of the day.

 

That's the first thing I tell potential shoppers. In the beginning of the process, we had a number of naive customers who expected this was the boot to being their foot problems to rest. I don't know what would make a guy go out and purchase a 130 flex boot and think its not going to be uncomfortable in either the break-in process or after skiing for the day.

 

Skiing is athletically demanding and your foot, at best, takes a lot of compression and rattling from the act of skiing alone. Building up the muscles to adequately ski a race boot takes patience and effort. Understanding the relationship between control and compression is key. Your foot has to be squeezed into a boot to be able to deliver the forces required to ski with control and comfort. Ahhhh, the trick is squeezing your foot in a manner that won't cause pain, fatigue or long term damage to the foot.

 

All good skiers want control. Not all skiers are strong enough to handle the compression it requires.

 

Flat out, if a guy looked soy, I started elsewhere on the boot wall.

 

This boot and all of the associated media (mine in Powder Magazine included) made it sound like the fit was going to be so custom, your foot would never be uncomfortable again. Well, the boot conforms sooo well to the foot, it is almost spray painted on. The tightest areas are in the toe box and upper instep. My shell size is a 318mm (27.5 mondo) and it was short for me. I've spend considerable time in Garmont Shamans @ 317mm (350 days) and Salomon Falcons @ 315 mms (200+ days) and the Vacuum 318mm was the shortest of them all. Odd shell sizing was the first obstacle I ran into. We did a number of Morton's Toe expansions.

 

Seen here on the left boot and eventually performed on the other foot, it gave this guy a just a bit of relief. Sure punches do best when allowed to sit for a long time, but with the Vacuum, it was definitely an overnight procedure. Being slopeside, we knock out punches and grinds in minutes and have gotten good at “speed punches”- allowing people to get back on the slopes ASAP. I thought the Vacuum held punches well:

 

IMG_1707.JPG

 

The Fischer Vacuum responds well to low volume inserts. Higher volume cork and synthetic cork inserts didn't work well at all- when I saw them. Too much volume in the insert forces the skier into the front of the boot, compounding an already tight toe box.

 

As with any bootfit hoping to deliver comfort and control (not necessarily in that order) a good custom insert is key. Tweaks in a racy fit are likely and are worthless without the solid foundation of a custom insert.

 

As my and the other bootfitters' knowledge grew throughout the season, we became my confident jumping into other problem fits from around the country. Remolds were common. #1 reason for a remold: most people overestimated their stance. Everybody thinks they're out posing for a new Heisman Trophy. Poor stance casting led to numerous other problems in the boot. From the start, I suggested skiers let me pick their stance- with a few objections here and there- I usually overrode most stance decisions.

 

Nope.” Too wide. “Nope.” Too wide again. “Nope.” Still too wide! This process repeated itself time and time again. Even good skiers greatly overestimated their stance width.

 

This is me figuring out stance at Fischer's Park City race HQ last Winter. I eventually casted myself wider than this. The boot never skied well until I was able to remold at the start of this ski season. A grid board probably isn't used in many fits- but measuring stance is, I figure out stance on the machine and with a carpenter's square.

 

Fischer Vacuum checking stance.jpg

 

I eventually built custom shims that sat into the trays on the machine itself. This enabled skiers with a narrow stance to get casted correctly. The metal flanges on the Vacuum Machine on the medial sides are too long- it forces a wider stance. I thought about taking the stance trays apart and getting the boys in the JHMR machine shop to trim them down a bit- but the authoritative powers shut that down pretty fast. That's when I made the shims. The effectiveness of the shims (allowing for a more narrow stance) were somewhat mitigated by the size of the pressure pillows. They inflate too big to get a really narrow stance. Plenty of skiers have a narrow stance- a stance way more narrow than the machine allows.

 

A few skiers wanted to reduce the forward lean. We put heel lifts under the heel of the boot to decrease forward lean. This worked with mixed results. I have no hard measurements. Anecdotal evidence showed it seemed to work- although the primary test case- for a woman ski instructor proved to be unsuccessful.

 

IMG_1610.JPG

 

From around the country, many skiers look to our slopeside boot bench at Bridger Gondola's side as a soldier looks to a M*A*S*H unit. I saw Fischer Vacuum fits from around the county. It was great. I remolded a number of them that were poorly performed, again, casting the stance way too wide.

 

Some Observations:

 

@ 98mm the interior volume of the boot is pretty low. The Vacuum responds well to the low volume, medium arch/instep with a narrow forefoot. Fat feet didn't work. Extra padding to force width in the exterior of the liner and between the shell didn't do too much.

 

Seen here are extra padding around the 1st Met joint and a heel lift under the toe to provide room. Again, getting the boot plenty hot was the key to making these modifications work.

 

IMG_1568.JPG

 

I made a few different custom pads that nestled over the instep between the liner and shell. If you had a tall instep, you got these pads. Constructed from a high durometer synthetic cork, they didn't compress under the heat and pressure from the mold. They were essential elements of the high instep fit.

 

The ten minute cook time wasn't enough to get the boot hot enough to mold well. After a few sessions we completely abandoned the times method and started to go for the “squish test”. It worked well. We cooked them on average for about 12-??? minutes. Sometimes more for the larger sizes.

 

The stock liner was said to be cold. I didn't find this true. Sure I was cold side on frigid days- there were many in December that were freezing. Adding Hotronics or Thermics defeats the purpose of having such a light and expensive boot.

 

This is foot of a woman in her forties with Raynaud's Syndrome. It was purple. This Fischer Vacuum fit eventually ended up with Intuition Plug Liner. No word on the Hotronics though, I suggested using the Intuitions liners first, then adding the boot warmers later. I think the warmth has been fine (it has been warm lately). The only problem this skier has was with the instep pressure... Still developing...

 

reynards condition.jpg

 

The liner was the major pitfall of this boot. Soft and on the cold(er) side it hobbled many fits from the start. It never expanded or conformed to the foot. The aluminum ??? material under the exterior mesh of the liner prevented the liner from expanding/contracting to conform to the fit. We had to fish gill the liners every time. Our bootfitters figured this out pretty quick. Placing gill cuts the liner on the first and fifth metatarsal head was essential. For a while there, every one came back that wasn't gill cut.

 

IMG_1600.JPG

 

I understand what may have been an issue for Fischer. Getting the liner soft enough to conform to the vacuum process, yet still be tough enough to live up to the expected reputation of the boot. A tough choice.

 

I skied the stock liner 70+ days before I put in an Intuition Plug liner. It was the de facto fix for many of the fitting problems I encountered. For most of December we were following Fischer's guidelines that the shell should be molded first, then cooled, then mold the intuition. It never worked. I couldn't get a decent fit. For a coworker's boot, I heated up the Intuitions and the shell at the same time and vacuum molded them at the same time. BAM! Perfection! Worked like a dream.

 

The best part of the the Fischer Vacuum was the weight. I've mentioned it before, weight complicates all issues. Whenever a skier came in complaining about boot pain with a Surefoot ™ boot/shell/liner/combo I'd just go over and pick up a Fischer Vacuum and hand it to them. Which one do you think will make your foot happier at the end of the day? I firmly believe many boot issues start with weight. Skiers aren't strong enough to move around the heavy boot/rental binding combo.

 

The Fischer Vacuum (with the Intuition Plug Liner upgrade) is so light that I believe many boot issues are solved immediately- just by weight reduction.

 

Be a weight weenie. I am. You should be too. Let the Big Guys push around the heavy metal. You setup is too heavy, I know it. Don't come to me complaining about how your feet hurt and have a set of heavy, obsolete cinder block ski boots on your feet! Slightly off topic- but trash those old skis too! They are heavy, cumbersome and are messing up your vacation. Don't even bring them home. Fat skis are easier to ski in all conditions and are ultimately easier on your joints.

 

Again off topic: So some guy comes in and drops major coin on a Fischer Vacuum or another high end boot and is still skiing on two shit show pieces of railroad track from 12 years ago!?! Hobbled from the start he is! Poor guy.

 

Back on topic:

 

Being as conformable as it is, the shell material is soft. I see potential issues as skiers let their toes and heel pieces wear down to the point they are going to mess up the shell. That's the #1 way a ski boot dies. Skiers won't ever check the toes and heels- until they start popping out prematurely. At this point the actual shell may have been worn down to the point it is unusable.

 

The first Vacuum I received was a prototype boot. There was no replaceable heel or toe. It wore quickly. After about 80 days I began popping out of the boot- a few time on big turns. The boot material is soft. I have to walk very little and the toes went pretty quick. Even on the test boot I've skied since then, the toe piece wore very fast- too fast!

 

Here almost worn though the second toe after 30 or so days. All skiers need to be careful to look at heels and toes on a regular basis. This boot is now close to shot. I thought the toe piece material was too soft. Not really a problem for a recreational skier logging 10-20 days/year on the hill. For an industrial skier- those working in their boots- the light weight makes these boots great for working, but the softness of the toe pieces need to get figured out. My heel barely wore at all.

 

IMG_2239.JPG

 

From the start, the Fischer guys recommended exterior heel padding to force the medial and lateral heel tighter to the foot. I never found that to work. Besides, the heel pocket was sufficiently tight for most skiers.

 

Molding Pressure:

 

After molding a few of the test boots Fischer gave us, the general pressure setting we choose for most fits was #220. It seemed to be the magic number. One of our bootfitters did a pair at 120 (or something very low) and it seemed to work fine. They guy came back in and liked the fit.

 

I found most skiers and customers I deal with were already pretty solid out on the hill and were looking for some high(er) pressures. I molded mine at #360 with the piping hot Intuition liner and a very soft Vacuum shell. The pressure wasn't unbearable.

 

Standard Intuition toe caps worked best at creating space during the mold. I got a lot of call and emails from other ski shops selling the Vacuum looking for counsel and ideas on molds. I always told other fitters I thought the toe caps worked best under the liner. One shop called and asked about putting the toecap on top of the liner- I said... “whatever works”. Later in the season, we were putting heel lifts under the toe to force more elevation from the toe box. Here, notice the heel lift placed under the toe of the liner:

 

IMG_1569.JPG

 

Overall Impressions:

 

I love this boot! 115+ days and counting! Light and stiff, it combines many of the features I'm looking for in a boot. Never mind all of the bad press.

 

A properly molded Intuition liner was key to the fit.

 

You'll like this boot.

 

Here @ the top of the Headwall. Hiking in this boot was especially nice- nice and light. Notice Damaris' (8 y/o) skis behind mine in the shot. HA! She's so strong!

 

Top of Headwall.jpg

 

Special Thanks:

 

Fischer

 

Atomic

 

Marker Jester

 

Burgess Custom- best custom made 3 layer Gore-Tex pants on the market- designed by you, built in the USA by her! The nicest pants I've ever worn!

 

 

 


Edited by Skiing-in-Jackson - 4/5/12 at 3:02pm
post #2 of 59

Great book concept.  I will make a point of picking it up. 

 

 

post #3 of 59

Good luck on the boot book, and I hope you reach a wider audience than just EpicSki.  Nice writeup on the Vacuum.

post #4 of 59

It seems that like any boot the vac is a good boot.....if it fits your feet. I also enjoyed how candid you were with what you needed to do to make this system work. It seems like Fischer should have partnered with Intuition from the get go.

post #5 of 59

Excellent writeup, thank you very much!  Everyone should come to this thread now for information on the Vacuum boots.

 

BTW, I purchased the eBook!


Edited by Gunnerbob - 4/6/12 at 7:56am
post #6 of 59

Does Fisher plan on adding replaceable toe and heal lugs?  Could the metal plates/cants be installed?  I do a fair amount of boot packs on rocky ridges and a lot of slack country that can involve walking roads.  Boot's that wear out quickly would be a nonstarter for me. I keep my boots as long as possible, 200-300 days?

 

I have a fairly fat foot with a very high instep.  Currently in an Xwave 10 26.5.  I tried a intuition power wrap, but it just had too much volume, probably should have tried the plug.

Would I even be a candidate for the Fisher and if so, what shell size would you start?

post #7 of 59

Great write-up Stephan!  I've been waiting for this.  I agree with you about the other thread.  Sadly I have read the whole thing and even commented in it a few times.  There definitely is an outspoken minority over there that really seem to have an Ax to grind about this boot.

 

As you know, I was one of the first in JH to get this boot and one of the first moldings done in the shop.  You molded me at 220 with no padding and an awesome fresh conformable foot-bed.  The boot was far too tight in the toe box and absolutely killed me.  I wanted to mold my stance a bit wider as you mentioned...  I wish that I had gone "slightly" wider than we did because the boot doesn't quite sit perfectly flat in my "normal" skiing stance.  It's pretty close and perfectly acceptable, but not ideal.  It was however such a change from my last boot that when I went to make my first turn of the season I literally almost fell over because the ski edge wasn't where I "thought" it should be.  My first day out, I was really starting to wonder if I had made a horrible expensive mistake.  I got used to the boot fairly quickly and love it now.  In fact when I ski in my old boots which I used to love, they feel strange and low performance even though the "fit" is still awesome.  I wonder if what I experienced out of the gate with the new boot is the root cause of some of the other peoples negative reviews?  Small Zoo Keeper talks of people making a few runs hating the boot and never looking back.  This was my initial experience also because it was so different from what I had before.

 

I skied for about 20 days in the stock liner and really tried to make it work for me.  The staff at JHS were very helpful, as always, and performed a series of liner and shell modifications to try and make the fit better.  I agree with many of the boots detractors that the liner provided really missed the mark.  I started to develop a horrific Achilles tendon problem that became the deal breaker between me and the stock liner.  Jeff made some clever modifications to the liner, but they never quite got the problem fixed.  I think you are spot on about the liner being too soft and unable to expand with the boot shell.  After 20 days that liner was definitely packing out for me and even with some substantial toe punches in the shell, I never felt like I was getting any room because the 98mm liner was still crushing my 102mm toes.  

 

I ultimately got an Intuition Powerwrap put into the boot.  This made the Achilles problem go away and made the boot FAR easier to get on and off.  I have about 100 days on this liner and it has packed a little, but is still rocking strong.  It also made the boot much warmer.  As you know I am a big fan of the Hotronics.  I am not sure why you think adding this system "defeats the purpose of having such a light and expensive boot".  The weight of the system is pretty negligible and I really know about it when I don't use them.  As you say, I am an "industrial user" and spend a lot of full days in my boots.  I learned long ago that the best thing I can do for my clients is take care of my basic needs so I can focus better on them.  Cold and unhappy feet are very distracting.  The Powerwrap liner has a lot of volume and made the boot fit very snug.  I wonder if the Plug version would have been better?  Again I was an early adopter and didn't get the full benefit of the experience that the staff has now.  

 

I never got the shell remolded because I never really felt like I had the time to allow it to properly recrystallize with my active skiing schedule.  Both big toes but particularly my left big toe quickly became sore and discolored.  About halfway through the season I noticed that this toe had gone permanently numb.  I got some more shell punching and heated up the toe box of the Intuition one last time and now the sensation seems to be slowly returning.  First my left boot and recently my right boot have developed tiny cracks in the shell by the overlap.  I have never had the problem with other boots, but my co-workers looked at them and said that they had seen it before in other boots.  Jeff drilled a stop hole in the left boot when it happened in January and that was effective at stopping its propagation.  He seemed to agree with what others had told me that sometimes boots crack there and it had little to do with the fact that it was a Fischer Vacuum.  The other crack appeared a few weeks ago and I'm letting it go without a stop hole because Fischer is warrantying the boots and I'm getting a new pair in the fall.

 

I put at least 100 days of hard use onto this boot.  At the end of the season it is the best boot I have ever owned.  It was not perfect out of the box like some seem to think it should have been, but it required far less work to get it skiing great than most other boots I've owned.  I also firmly believe that when I get the fresh pair next fall that the experience that the boot staff has gained will make the "new" boot fit nearly perfectly on it's first day on snow.  Based on my experience, what you've written here, and conversations that I've had with the fitting staff and other Vacuum users, next year I will be looking for:

 

A large toe cap during the molding process possibly with a shim under the toes

A simultaneous reheating of the existing Powerwrap liner with the new shell or a replacement with the lower volume Plug version

A "slightly" wider stance at molding

Possibly more pressure at molding, but not a lot

post #8 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHREDHEAD View Post

Does Fisher plan on adding replaceable toe and heal lugs? 


Would that even be desirable? I'd rather have solid lugs that can be lifterized, canted and planed easily.

post #9 of 59

My production Vac 130 from this year featured replaceable toe and heel lugs.  I believe that the "race" version and the prototype version that Stephan originally received do not.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by SHREDHEAD View Post

Does Fisher plan on adding replaceable toe and heal lugs?  Could the metal plates/cants be installed?  I do a fair amount of boot packs on rocky ridges and a lot of slack country that can involve walking roads.  Boot's that wear out quickly would be a nonstarter for me. I keep my boots as long as possible, 200-300 days?

 

I have a fairly fat foot with a very high instep.  Currently in an Xwave 10 26.5.  I tried a intuition power wrap, but it just had too much volume, probably should have tried the plug.

Would I even be a candidate for the Fisher and if so, what shell size would you start?



 

post #10 of 59

It was probably time for a new thread.

 

Fantastic write-up.  The comments about the fish gills is very interesting.  I had a toe punch of significant size done and while it feels much better it's not perfect.  I've wondered if the liner was not expanding into the depression completely.  I'm tempted to add a couple of 'gills' to my liner to see if it helps.  Worse case scenario is I have an excuse to get Intuition liners next season.  Did you cut all the way through or just the outer layer?

post #11 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by tetonpwdrjunkie View Post

Great write-up Stephan!  I've been waiting for this.  I agree with you about the other thread.  Sadly I have read the whole thing and even commented in it a few times.  There definitely is an outspoken minority over there that really seem to have an Ax to grind about this boot.

 

As you know, I was one of the first in JH to get this boot and one of the first moldings done in the shop.  You molded me at 220 with no padding and an awesome fresh conformable foot-bed.  The boot was far too tight in the toe box and absolutely killed me.  I wanted to mold my stance a bit wider as you mentioned...  I wish that I had gone "slightly" wider than we did because the boot doesn't quite sit perfectly flat in my "normal" skiing stance.  It's pretty close and perfectly acceptable, but not ideal.  It was however such a change from my last boot that when I went to make my first turn of the season I literally almost fell over because the ski edge wasn't where I "thought" it should be.  My first day out, I was really starting to wonder if I had made a horrible expensive mistake.  I got used to the boot fairly quickly and love it now.  In fact when I ski in my old boots which I used to love, they feel strange and low performance even though the "fit" is still awesome.  I wonder if what I experienced out of the gate with the new boot is the root cause of some of the other peoples negative reviews?  Small Zoo Keeper talks of people making a few runs hating the boot and never looking back.  This was my initial experience also because it was so different from what I had before.

 

I skied for about 20 days in the stock liner and really tried to make it work for me.  The staff at JHS were very helpful, as always, and performed a series of liner and shell modifications to try and make the fit better.  I agree with many of the boots detractors that the liner provided really missed the mark.  I started to develop a horrific Achilles tendon problem that became the deal breaker between me and the stock liner.  Jeff made some clever modifications to the liner, but they never quite got the problem fixed.  I think you are spot on about the liner being too soft and unable to expand with the boot shell.  After 20 days that liner was definitely packing out for me and even with some substantial toe punches in the shell, I never felt like I was getting any room because the 98mm liner was still crushing my 102mm toes.  

 

I ultimately got an Intuition Powerwrap put into the boot.  This made the Achilles problem go away and made the boot FAR easier to get on and off.  I have about 100 days on this liner and it has packed a little, but is still rocking strong.  It also made the boot much warmer.  As you know I am a big fan of the Hotronics.  I am not sure why you think adding this system "defeats the purpose of having such a light and expensive boot".  The weight of the system is pretty negligible and I really know about it when I don't use them.  As you say, I am an "industrial user" and spend a lot of full days in my boots.  I learned long ago that the best thing I can do for my clients is take care of my basic needs so I can focus better on them.  Cold and unhappy feet are very distracting.  The Powerwrap liner has a lot of volume and made the boot fit very snug.  I wonder if the Plug version would have been better?  Again I was an early adopter and didn't get the full benefit of the experience that the staff has now.  

 

I never got the shell remolded because I never really felt like I had the time to allow it to properly recrystallize with my active skiing schedule.  Both big toes but particularly my left big toe quickly became sore and discolored.  About halfway through the season I noticed that this toe had gone permanently numb.  I got some more shell punching and heated up the toe box of the Intuition one last time and now the sensation seems to be slowly returning.  First my left boot and recently my right boot have developed tiny cracks in the shell by the overlap.  I have never had the problem with other boots, but my co-workers looked at them and said that they had seen it before in other boots.  Jeff drilled a stop hole in the left boot when it happened in January and that was effective at stopping its propagation.  He seemed to agree with what others had told me that sometimes boots crack there and it had little to do with the fact that it was a Fischer Vacuum.  The other crack appeared a few weeks ago and I'm letting it go without a stop hole because Fischer is warrantying the boots and I'm getting a new pair in the fall.

 

I put at least 100 days of hard use onto this boot.  At the end of the season it is the best boot I have ever owned.  It was not perfect out of the box like some seem to think it should have been, but it required far less work to get it skiing great than most other boots I've owned.  I also firmly believe that when I get the fresh pair next fall that the experience that the boot staff has gained will make the "new" boot fit nearly perfectly on it's first day on snow.  Based on my experience, what you've written here, and conversations that I've had with the fitting staff and other Vacuum users, next year I will be looking for:

 

A large toe cap during the molding process possibly with a shim under the toes

A simultaneous reheating of the existing Powerwrap liner with the new shell or a replacement with the lower volume Plug version

A "slightly" wider stance at molding

Possibly more pressure at molding, but not a lot

I don't think it's so much of axes to grind but more a case of Fischer didn't really seem to beta test this. One would think that for the price of the boot, the stock required, and the machine itself that this would have been a little vetted before being hailed as the second coming.
 

 

post #12 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by epic View Post


Would that even be desirable? I'd rather have solid lugs that can be lifterized, canted and planed easily.



It would be to me, just because I don't use cants and absolutely hate getting new boots?

post #13 of 59

I've always believed in the saying:

"Be just behind the bleeding edge of technology

 

Great write-up Stephen! It's great to hear the "sage" wisdom of a boot-fitting Pro!

 

Just hoping Fisher will step up and make this boot a true game-changer.

 

PS - Plans include getting back to JH next season to ski with Stephen and team McDonald. Gotta love anybody who skis in a green tweed sportcoat!

post #14 of 59

Nice work, Stephen.  It was Stephen that gave me incentive to stick with the boot, and his suggestions and techniques are spot on-

the reverse heel lift and low volume insert are key, the boot does have a very low toe height that cut off my circulation.  This on a trip to AK after two wimpy toe punches at the retailer.

So yeah-get it hot, use high pressure, pad well and counteract the toe box.  And the rumored stock Intuition next year is the way to go.

 

 

 

 

 

 

post #15 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by otto parts View Post

And the rumored stock Intuition next year is the way to go.

 

 

 

 

 

 



What rumor?  All I've read are random people saying Fischer should switch to an Intuition liner.

post #16 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHREDHEAD View Post



It would be to me, just because I don't use cants and absolutely hate getting new boots?


You can put a sacrificial lifter on any boot that can take lifters, but you often can't lift and cant boots that have replacable heels and toes.

 

post #17 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheArchitect View Post



What rumor?  All I've read are random people saying Fischer should switch to an Intuition liner.



They have samples from Intuition they are looking at at Fischer.

 

post #18 of 59

So who are the "industrial users" in Jackson, aside from SIJ and TPJ?  I have been looking actively for the last

3 weeks, and I have not seen any vacuums here.

 

Have you sold any to 100 plus day locals?

 

The main sponsored Fischer athlete, Jeff Annetts does not ski in a vacuum.

 

Just curious.

 

This thread was started because another pretty reputable boot fitter from Cham started lobbing bombs.

 

The idea is great, but can't we talk about the way Fischer is trying to leverage market share through the hype,

and the fact that consumers are the beta testers?

post #19 of 59

Very well written and thoughtful article. Particularly agree with getting the boots hot to start with, great to see that one of the retailers really went to town testing this to get the right results. Note to the public that not all have or will go to these lengths to make this product work, this guy seems to be happy to do so and has used genuine expertise and testing to get what you people need. 

 

Not really our style to report in such a way, but would like to give this guy a massive pat on the back, all of the retailers should have attacked this product this way, (many will say they did, which is easy in light of this guys efforts.) 

 

Hip Hip Hooray!

 

Buying Fischer Vacuum? Buy from this guy!

post #20 of 59

Would also like to point out that it was not our intention to "sling mud" or "throw bombs". This is potentially a game changer, however for Fischer to make these outlandish claims about an untried product (from the public and retailer perspective) meant that I wanted to add our take on things. We have seen, used, tested, purchased the product as Fischer claimed was to be done and it didn't work. The public have had their chance to report this with both failure and success. The public have paid the price and so have many of the retailers. This doesn't mean the product wont work in the right hands, which has been proved here with due diligence. However Fischer claimed to have addressed that too, by "selecting" the best bootfitters there are, this we should point out is going to be impossible, like chefs and resturants there is too much "interpretation for this to be possible.

 

In the end, our sense of fun and irony (some of you might need "wikipedia" for the later) took over and we've realised at least that we can continue to offer our clients the best product and service without the need for this technology, should it truely be a game changer, we're looking forward to seeing the efforts of Salomon, Lange et al in the next few years, they after all are those with the most at stake.

 

Over and out, XX

post #21 of 59
I am going to translate what SZK said: if you think that Vacuum technology removes a need for a good bootfitter, you are delusional. Good fitters have the skills and knowledge that, combined with the experience and enough effort to understand the product, will make the technology work. Whether that said boot fitters wants to invest the time to master the product is a purely business decision and can go both ways. The technology IS a potential game changer, so early adopters will reap the most benefit. I think those statements are fairly non-controversial. I enjoyed the rest of the discussion, especially the roll experiment. And I keep enjoying skiing in my yellow Vacuum 130 boots.

Find the cure for ordinary - Squaw Valley

Reply
post #22 of 59

Now, as for productive conversation here......Stephen, can you (or anyone else) please comment on which Intuition liner is recommended?  I'm seeing a couple different versions.....Powerwrap, Plug?  Intuition themselves recommended the Dreamliner to me.  I want to get Intuitions for my Vacs but I'm not sure which to go with.  Any info/help would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Edited to keep thread on track. Philpug.

post #23 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skiing-in-Jackson View Post

 

This boot and all of the associated media (mine in Powder Magazine included) made it sound like the fit was going to be so custom, your foot would never be uncomfortable again. Well, the boot conforms sooo well to the foot, it is almost spray painted on. The tightest areas are in the toe box and upper instep. My shell size is a 318mm (27.5 mondo) and it was short for me. I've spend considerable time in Garmont Shamans @ 317mm (350 days) and Salomon Falcons @ 315 mms (200+ days) and the Vacuum 318mm was the shortest of them all. Odd shell sizing was the first obstacle I ran into. We did a number of Morton's Toe expansions.

 

 

Stephen, interesting point.  I was mounting a pair of Fischer GS this afternoon and the guy had a Vacuum boot marked as a 307 sole length.  When I put the boot in the jig it was actually 303 BSL  Go figure.  First time i have seen this level of discrepancy between the marked length and the jig measured length.  The guy whose boots they were also confirmed that he had had to move bindings FORWARD compared to his 305 Dobie.  I wonder if this is common across all the Vacuum boots that it is shorter than marked on the BSL??

post #24 of 59

Stephen-  Any experience with molding Fischer boots with Intuition Dreamliners?   

Find the cure for ordinary - Squaw Valley

Reply
post #25 of 59
Thread Starter 
Thanks for the great feedback.

Currently the kids and I are road tripping across the country in the VW Bus en route to Cape Hatteras for a surfing trip. Now in IL.

One hell of a TR is on the way!
post #26 of 59

Windsurfered there years ago, experience a mini funnel claods while we were there eek.gif, mind you the wind was great 45 to 55 knots (just wild) yahoo.gif

post #27 of 59

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunnerbob View Post

Now, as for productive conversation here......Stephen, can you (or anyone else) please comment on which Intuition liner is recommended?  I'm seeing a couple different versions.....Powerwrap, Plug?  Intuition themselves recommended the Dreamliner to me.  I want to get Intuitions for my Vacs but I'm not sure which to go with.  Any info/help would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

Edited to keep thread on track. Philpug.

 

I am very curious as well.  After a great season in my new Vacuum 110s, my only significant complaint is with the ice cold liners.  I have a very high volume foot though, and am curious as to which Intuition liner would be the best choice for retrofit of my Vacuums next year.

post #28 of 59

When you say fat feet don't work well, do you simply mean wide feet or high volume feet in general? I was looking at your picture showing padding taped up, but couldn't figure out if you were trying to expand the upper part of the foot or just the width (wouldn't a 102 last have made more sense for that? am I missing something).

 

I need new boots, was hoping these were the solution but your comment is scaring me.

 

 

 

 

post #29 of 59

Slight drift, but I'd love to have someone standardize what "high/low volume" means. At times it appears to = meaty vs skinny, at other times it seems to mean wide vs narrow. And no one ever differentiates between all over vs anatomical regions. So a wide heel and narrow front may be high volume, as would a narrow heel and wide forefoot, or a normal width foot with a very high beefy instep region. The various alternatives are not the same, in terms of fit issues or plastic stretching or anything else, whatever makers want to believe.

 

Saying the Vacuum is not for higher volume feet is useless. It's like calling an America's Cup hull the same as a garbage barge because they have the same displacement.

post #30 of 59

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by beyond View Post

Slight drift, but I'd love to have someone standardize what "high/low volume" means.

 

Head kind of attempts to do this since they publish volume along with last widths.  In the Raptor line the lowest volume (RD series) are 1500cc, while the RS series are 1800cc.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Live from Jackson Hole: My Fischer Vacuum Thread