or Connect
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Member Gear Reviews › Rossignol E98 vs. Blizzard Bonafide Review and Thoughts
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rossignol E98 vs. Blizzard Bonafide Review and Thoughts

post #1 of 7
Thread Starter 

Local hill finally got some soft snow this past weekend, so, finally got out on some "wider" skis.  Been skiing carvers all year so far on scratchy firm conditions.

 

Me: Middle Aged, 6'1", 230#, skiing forever, level?? who knows -- ski fast and aggressive, and try to carve clean turns when possible.

 

Tested:

 

Blizzard Bonafide - 180cm:

 

I had a couple of test runs on this last spring at industry trade fair in Snowbasin, my impression then, was that it was a super-easy, but stable 98mm ski.  Didn't blow me away, but was competent.

 

Spent half a day on this same ski yesterday - 6" of windblown crud, but very nice snow.  Again, nimble, super-easy to turn, very playful, excellent in trees and tight spots. Handled the crud and soft snow very well, tips never dived once, but did experience some tip deflection in stiffer wind-slabed sections.   It did not strike me as demanding at all, kind of like a Rossi S3 or Fischer Watea 98 on steroids. However, the sweet spot is very small on the Bonafide for me, it really wants to be skiied from a centered stance, it doesn't like to be worked from tip to tail.  Although it is forgiving of balance errors, the tip doesn't really engage strongly, and it washes out in the tail when pressured.  It will carve a clean turn, but must stay centered.  I kept feeling like I was going to go over the dashboard with tip pressure, and washing out in the tail when finishing the turn.  Perhaps, I would be better served on the 187cm, with my weight. 

 

I really enjoyed skiing this ski, and it hits the mark for a forgiving, soft snow ski for 90% of the upper intermediate to advanced skier market.  In general, I much prefer the Blizzard One over the Bonafide.  It's design of minimal camber and rocker, fits my tastes far better than the strongly rockered Bonafide.  I know that I am in the minority here, as the "Bone" is the flavor of the year.  I am kind of worried about the Blizzard Magnum series going to flip-core next season.  The past interations of the Magnums have been great for the expert skier that skis firmer conditions, I'm afraid that the flip-core design will "defang" them to the point that they become another K2.

 

Rossignol Experience 98 - 180cm

 

Very different ski than the Bonafide.  I wouldn't have known that it had any rocker at all, based on performance.  It definitely felt like a 180cm ski, whereas the Bonafide felt short.  This ski was a very stable, and "carvy" on firmer surfaces, felt like a wide GS ski, surprising for a ski of this width.  But, it did not float well in the crud and soft snow, it wanted to stay in the snow and blast the crud, rather than floating over like the Bonafide.  Reminded me of the old style Volkl Mantra or Blizzard Atlas in its crud performance.  It prefers a centered to forward stance, typical Rossi there, but found the tail a little unforgiving- don't get in the backseat, as it will take you for a ride.  The E98 didn't come alive until it got up to speed, it was a little ponderous at slower speeds and in tighter spaces.

 

The E98 seems more "traditional", even though it has some rocker in the tip and tail, its effect is minimal.  It is definitely a more serious ski, that demands good skills and aggression.  Definitely for an strong, advanced to expert rider. 

 

Just my two cents on two skis that have been reviewed to death here.  But may be helpful to some others here.

 

 

post #2 of 7
Quote:

Originally Posted by coolhand View Post


  I am kind of worried about the Blizzard Magnum series going to flip-core next season.  The past interations of the Magnums have been great for the expert skier that skis firmer conditions, I'm afraid that the flip-core design will "defang" them to the point that they become another K2.

 



Defang?......to an extent yes (and intentionally so I might add). More versatile??........absolutely yes. Another K2?........not nohow.

 

SJ

post #3 of 7

At 230, you might be better served by the longer lengths, 187 for the Bonafide and 188 for the E98. Haven't had any trouble with crud, windpacked, or powder with the 180 E98, but I'm 25-30 lbs lighter. Nice review above and agree about the tail of the E98. Thanks for taking the time.

post #4 of 7

The 187cm Bonafide is the size you want to test. I am much lighter and smalled and that is the size I would get for outwest skiing.

post #5 of 7

I weigh 180 ish and am 5'10".  The 187 Bone works fine for me for most conditions,  Occasionally when I in tight trees with harsh bumps I wish I had a 180, but most of the time the 187 is great.  skis shorter than it is

post #6 of 7

Yeah, probably 187 for you.  But, I agree, The One is a great ski in it's own right.  Bone isn't for everyone: I have already had a couple of trade-ins for people who purchased it sight unseen and needed a softer ski for their local bumps and tight trees, or they found it too much ski in the tail.  I was skiing the Watea 98 the other day, and it has much more of "The One" feel in the packed, dense cruddy crap we were skiing: much easier than the Bonafide there, as the tip seemed to be more active, and the tail with a more predictable release.  The One shouldn't have been killed, IMO, but then again, there are several good skis w/o metal and tip/tail rocker out there that are similar.

post #7 of 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhand View Post
I am kind of worried about the Blizzard Magnum series going to flip-core next season.  The past interations of the Magnums have been great for the expert skier that skis firmer conditions, I'm afraid that the flip-core design will "defang" them to the point that they become another K2.


Interesting point, as is yours and Dawgs about The One. I have not skied this year's early rise 8.7, but assume it made a really good ski even better. However, IMO the strength of the 8.7 is precisely its, ah, fangs. Or put another way, that it's a fairly beefy carver with a traditional tail that not's wildly, abruptly stiff (it feels like the flex profile of most of Blizzard's skis from a few years ago, comparatively a little stiffer in front and softer in back than the competition). Sort of like the One is a non-beefy ski with a well-worked out extended rise at both ends that manages to also engage all the way if you choose. For apparent reasons based on marketing projections, Blizzard is putting way more rocker on one and killing the other. Not to say this is evil or anything - if most buyers want more rocker rewarding a more neutral stance, then that is what they should get - and I'm sure the new Magnums will be fine skis and blah blah blah. But it narrows down the market by one brand for those 6 remaining humans who like to drive a mid-fat ski all along the edge and think serious rocker is best in fat skis on soft snow. Sigh...

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Member Gear Reviews
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Member Gear Reviews › Rossignol E98 vs. Blizzard Bonafide Review and Thoughts