EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Second Thoughts About Volkl Kendo
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Second Thoughts About Volkl Kendo

post #1 of 42
Thread Starter 

I bought a pair of 184 Volkl Kendos (as my first pair of owned skis) at the end of last season after skiing them for 4 days at Big Sky. The snow was in great shape, but we had virtually no fresh snow while we were there. So, I was mostly ripping down groomers or getting into some lighter stuff on the edges of groomed trails.

 

Having just returned from 4 days at Jackson Hole, I'm having second thoughts about my decision to buy the Kendos. Being that JH got slammed with tons of fresh, heavy snow, I ended up ditching the Kendos by day 3 in favor of some rented skis that were fatter under foot, the DPS Wailer 112 Hybrid. 

 

Though it won't be surprise that the Wailers outperformed the Kendos in the deep stuff, it still left me wondering whether I picked the right ski.  

 

Things worth mentioning: I'm 6'1" 235 lbs and an unexperienced powder skier, as I'm relatively new to the sport and live on the east coast. 

 

I found the Kendos very hard to keep up in the deep stuff. However, I'm not sure if this is mostly my inexperience or the ski or the ski dimensions and my weight. When choosing the Kendos, I weighed in the fact that they get pretty good reviews for powder performance given their size and shape. I also found the Wailers incredibly easier to maneuver in bumps.

 

Anyway, while I still love the Kendos on flat snow, I'm left wondering whether I could get similar groomer performance from a ski with a bit of a rocker and that is fatter underfoot. Not the Wailer 112, but perhaps the newer Wailer that is 99 underfoot. Or maybe even the Mantra.

 

I'm rambling.

 

Thoughts?

post #2 of 42

The Keno is a fine hard snow ski but the traits that make it good on hard snow, are it's downfall in soft/deep snow, it is stiff and fully cambered. Don't even consider the Mantra as an option, you are going front eh frying pan into the fire, even though the Mantra has a bit of early rise, it is very stiff especially in the tail and also not good in deep snow. I would suggest keeping the Kendo for hard snow and getting a Wailer 112 (or such) to complement it. Since you did like the Wailer 112, IMHO you struck oil, stop drilling and get some. 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #3 of 42

The Wailer 99 would make a nice EC ski, IMO. It does have a fairly stiff tail, so you've got to ski it right, or it won't work for you. Check out this review of it: http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/first-look-2012-2013-dps-wailer-99-184cm. They do a good job of reviewing this ski. At 235lbs, I'd also look at the 190s.

post #4 of 42

Did you ski in the east in Dec. or early January?  If so how were the skis there?

 

As an east coast skier (assuming that you ski mostly east coast), getting a ski as your only ski geared for deep powder does not make a lot of sense to me. It may be a good second ski but your prime ski should perform well in the conditions you ski most often. For me skiing PA (30+), NY (5-10) and 10 days or so in VT and NH, the skis I use most are narrow carvers. I encounter ice 20x more frequently than powder and the better a ski becomes in powder, the worse it will do on ice (as a general rule).

post #5 of 42
Thread Starter 

Well, I live on the EC, but I actually do most of my skiing out west. Now, that's because I'm only getting 10-15 days per year under my belt thus far -- but I'm endeavoring to get more. Currently, I'm doing about 10-12 days out west and the rest nearer to home. More days would come in the form of more EC skiing, however. This would put me closer to a 50/50 split.

 

And, as much as I like the idea of a 2-ski quiver, I'm just not sure that's justifiable given the amount of skiing I do. 

 

Even with traveling to the west, the chances of hitting multi foot+ dumps the way I just did in JH are minimal, so I guess I'm wondering if there's a better one ski quiver for me. Something that I can still rip down groomers in, but that will give me more confidence off piste than the Kendo currently does. 

 

It's also worth mentioning that I feel I learned a great deal about skiing deeper snow while on the Wailers (had a lesson as well). I haven't skied the Kendos since, so I'm left wondering whether some of what I learned will translate into better performance in powder with the Kendos. I sort of felt the Kendos did okay on my first day at JH, when there was about 6-8" of fresh light stuff. The remaning days had much more snow and much much heavier, wetter snow. 

 

I plan to test this theory out by demoing more skis when at Whistler in a week or two, so that was the point of the thread -- ideas on if my line of thinking makes any sense and if it does, recommendations on better one-ski quiver candidates (other than the Wailer 99s).

post #6 of 42

Demo Salomon 2012's.  I dumped my Kendos for them last season.  Just took a chance that people said they can ski anything and I liked the look of them and tried them.

 

They ski as well as the Kendo on any eastern condtion, better in the bumps IMO and (of course) kill them in the powder.  You would need to ski them in the longest length b/c of the rocker and center mount.

 

 

post #7 of 42
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by swellhunter View Post

Demo Salomon 2012's.  I dumped my Kendos for them last season.  Just took a chance that people said they can ski anything and I liked the look of them and tried them.

 

 



Look interesting, but I'm a bit skeptical about dumping the Kendos for something that only offers 3mm more under foot. I'm sure the rocker plays in to make them better in powder, but I'm not sure I wouldn't want to get something closer to 100mm underfoot if I was switching. Will give them a shot, though.

post #8 of 42
Thread Starter 

Hmm. Interestingly enough, it looks DPS also makes the Wailer in a 105 underfoot, in addition to the 99.

post #9 of 42

Remember, the more things you ask a ski to do, the less things it does well. To expect a ski to react well on east coast hardpack (see: ICE) and went coast powder...in unrealistic. It is just money...at this point the Kendo's are paid for..just man up and get another pair of skis. It IS skiing after all. beercheer.gif

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #10 of 42
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

Remember, the more things you ask a ski to do, the less things it does well. To expect a ski to react well on east coast hardpack (see: ICE) and went coast powder...in unrealistic. It is just money...at this point the Kendo's are paid for..just man up and get another pair of skis. It IS skiing after all. beercheer.gif



Philpug - your sort of thinking is music to my ears but poison to my bank account.

 

I just blew my chance to buy those Wailers with a $90 credit for demo rentals. Couldn't pull the trigger after skiing them two days and considering I'm new to the sport and don't get to ski as much as I like.

 

If I skied 50+ days a year I'd have 3 pairs by now. ;)

 

Perhaps if I demo them again in Whistler and they'll credit me money spent, I'll end up pulling the trigger. 

 

1 or 2 pairs, I'm still wondering if I wouldn't be happier with the 99 Wailers than the Kendo. I think I'm being a bit hard on the Kendos, though. I loved those skis last year, and now I'm down on them because they didn't do well in the most recent conditions I skied them in. Which, in all fairness, was most definitely mostly me (I'm betting).

post #11 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenlander View Post



Philpug - your sort of thinking is music to my ears but poison to my bank account.

 

I just blew my chance to buy those Wailers with a $90 credit for demo rentals. Couldn't pull the trigger after skiing them two days and considering I'm new to the sport and don't get to ski as much as I like.

 

If I skied 50+ days a year I'd have 3 pairs by now. ;)

 

Perhaps if I demo them again in Whistler and they'll credit me money spent, I'll end up pulling the trigger. 

 

1 or 2 pairs, I'm still wondering if I wouldn't be happier with the 99 Wailers than the Kendo. I think I'm being a bit hard on the Kendos, though. I loved those skis last year, and now I'm down on them because they didn't do well in the most recent conditions I skied them in. Which, in all fairness, was most definitely mostly me (I'm betting).


No you will not. I am just in the process of posting a review of the DPS 99 Wailer. frown.gif

 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #12 of 42
Thread Starter 

Doesn't sound like I'll be able to demo the Wailer 112s again in Whistler. The only DPS dealer in Whistler or Squamish doesn't demo them. frown.gif

post #13 of 42

If you come to Whistler you can demo some skis for free.  There's a Canski tent by the Roundhouse (village gondola will take you there).  The selection is limited to Head, Rossi, Salomon and Atomic I believe.  You can take the skis out for 2 hours.

post #14 of 42

   You're thinking too much. The two things that stand out to me are "new to the sport" and "east coast". The Kendos are a fine ski, one of the very best out there and are well suited to east coast conditions. They are a forgiving but "expert" level ski. Just ski the heck out of them and you'll get comfortable with them. Many people on this forum tend to overestimate their ability, don't do that. Learn to use the Kendos, they're fine. Big fat soft rockered skis can be rented if you need them out west and every year there'll be a new flavor. Most  frequent skiers have at least two pairs, a hard snow ski and a fatter soft snow ski. The buzz this year is Blizzard, next year it'll be another. Only Phil has them all...

    I saw some funny guy (who ducked a Utah rope) in an odd snowplow tail gunning powder technique on a pair of DPS 112 bananas the other day which reminded me that the ski doesn't make the skier.


Edited by Mr. Crab - 1/23/12 at 6:29pm
post #15 of 42
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Crab View Post

   You're thinking too much. The two things that stand out to me are "new to the sport" and "east coast". The Kendos are a fine ski, one of the very best out there and are well suited to east coast conditions. They are a forgiving but "expert" level ski. Just ski the heck out of them and you'll get comfortable with them.\



It is very possible I'm over thinking. I tend to do that when it comes to gear of any kind. That said, I really enjoyed those bananas in the deep stuff. 

 

East Coast is very deceiving with me. While I live here, I do the vast majority of my skiing "out there". I've literally skied 80% of my time on skis out west. As I mentioned above, I hope to change this, if only because I currently still live on the EC and want to ski more -- and the 3 trips I'm making out west per year are definitely all I can manage.

post #16 of 42
Thread Starter 

So, if I need powder skis while in Whistler next week and can't get my hands on the DPS Wailer 112s (which I seemingly won't be able to), would the Rossi S7s be the most similar alternative?

post #17 of 42

Hey greenlander,

 

I've never tried the Kendo, but demo'd the Mantra earlier this year and wasn't overly impressed. I felt that they were a very good, stable carver for how wide they are, but was unimpressed with their responsiveness in the thick stuff. I'm an east coaster too and highly recommend the Fischer Watea line. I tried the Watea 94 out in Telluride last year and absolutely loved them for the groomed and slightly off-piste runs, but never tried them in the deep stuff.  They are a very light, playful ski with slight early rise/rocker that makes initiating turns very easy.

 

Since I already have east coast skis though and wanted something more powder oriented, I bought the Watea 98 this year and skied them for the first time this past weekend at Stowe. Saturday was an east coast "powder" day where you get random clumps of thick powder over hardpack with spots of ice by the end of the day. Sunday was much harder and icy, but they still help their own. These skis are pretty flexible, so they are clearly not made for east coast ice, but still held up surprisingly well. I could carve the ice, but really had to work the turns because of their flex. When it came to the "powder", I feel that they have a good balance of pushing through crud and floating smoothly over the lighter stuff. In the bumps they are really easy to handle too.

 

I'm not sure how they will do in the deep stuff yet, but if it's not good enough they always have the Watea 101. Oh, and for reference I'm 5'8" 190lbs and have the 176cm, but they make something in the 180s. Hope you like em!

 

 

post #18 of 42

Don't get hooked up on a specific big wide soft ski. Since you're new to sport and have little experience with deep snow you'll have plenty of opportunity to discover what works best for you as your skills develop. If you can invest is some deep snow ski lessons and worry about the perfect skis later.

 

FWIW I'm 6'1" and 220#. My current daily is a Prophet 90 186 and have a old pair of 2008 Pontoons 189 for POW. I've skied the Kendo and think it's a great ski for the East Coast. 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenlander View Post

So, if I need powder skis while in Whistler next week and can't get my hands on the DPS Wailer 112s (which I seemingly won't be able to), would the Rossi S7s be the most similar alternative?



 

post #19 of 42
Thread Starter 

Thanks for the continued feedback on some other skis to demo.

 

And JimiB - good thoughts. But for the record, I'm not hung up on the Wailer (well, maybe a little). Most importantly, I just had a really fun time skiing it and found it very easy to work with , especially so considering my inexperience in the conditions. So, if I can't get my hands on it while in Whistler, I'd be eager to ski something else like it for at least a day or two ... that's my line of inquiry on the Rossi S7.

post #20 of 42

the kendo is 88mm waist if i am not mistaken. These should be enough to ski freshies all day long. Perhaps a little short for your height and weight. My first experience in powder was on my carving sticks (165cm sl skis with a 67mm waist). They worked poorly but I still had a great time. Work on your technique and rent if you don't get many big days. 

 

My big pair are only 10mm wider than your kendos, although do have rocker.

 

Skis don't make the skiier...

post #21 of 42


Understood and assumed. Just wanted to point out that there are even more options for you than are being discussed. Should have just said that.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by greenlander View Post

 

And JimiB - good thoughts. But for the record, I'm not hung up on the Wailer (well, maybe a little). Most importantly, I just had a really fun time skiing it and found it very easy to work with , especially so considering my inexperience in the conditions. So, if I can't get my hands on it while in Whistler, I'd be eager to ski something else like it for at least a day or two ... that's my line of inquiry on the Rossi S7.



 

post #22 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post

Remember, the more things you ask a ski to do, the less things it does well. To expect a ski to react well on east coast hardpack (see: ICE) and went coast powder...in unrealistic. It is just money...at this point the Kendo's are paid for..just man up and get another pair of skis. It IS skiing after all. beercheer.gif


Nicely said !!!!

 

I ski the EC most of the time, with a trip or two west per season.  Currently have the Shiro as my pow ski, also works very well in the crud as well, and a Tigershark 10 as my primary ski.  I don't expect the Shiro to rip groomers, but honestly skis hard pack way better than I expected. So yeah, what he said buy another ski. I am actually tossing around the idea of a 3 ski quiver, "Ice pick disco sticks, something between 85 to 95 underfoot (Early rise), and my current Shiros.

 

Some more food for thought: Different ski dimensions and flex only enhance the experience.  Don't expect a pair of skis to fix an ability issue.  There is no such thing as buying a turn. 

 

post #23 of 42

FIrst off, get this idea of a one ski quiver out of your head.  This is just some ski company's mktg depts hipe.  Yeah you can play a round of golf with a bag of 5 irons but dont expect to score a low score.  I ski the kendo as my everyday western ski, it handles groomers, small bumps and resort powder (6") just fine.  For powder (6"+) I have a softer wider ski (gotamas) and for racing I have sl racing skis.  My biggest suggestion would be to go with Marker Shizo binding setup.  Being able to move the boot center forward or back changes the way it skis tremendously.  For firm snow and groomers my kendos go 1cm forward if caught in unexpected powder I go back 1-1.5cm back.  This softens the tip and helps lift the tip to the surface, moving it forward and the ski becomes much more lively and a quick turner.  Like others said, learn how to ski the ski you own and think about a second ski. For me the gotama was a perfect match. 

post #24 of 42
There's no reason whatever that you can't use the Kendo or any other 88mm waisted ski on both EC hardpack and Rockies/WC 3D snow. It's fine for both situations. The real question is whether you like the way it skis. If you don't, you're not going to enjoy it in any condition. For example, if you don't like the lively, stout and precise feel of a Kendo or Mantra when you ski it, it's not because of the waist width. It's a Volkl thing. You could instead try a Rossignol Experience 88, or an Elan Apex, or whatever Dynastar's 88mm ski is.

I ski an 88mm waisted ski 90% of my ski days in an average season. In absurd years with obnoxious amounts of snow, that number drops maybe to 50%. Northern rockies. I weigh 150. Someone who weighs 200 lbs would still be fine on hardpack, but would probably feel a little sink-y in 3D snow at 88mm waist. But still, I know people who weigh up near 200 who happily ski pow days on 80mm waisted skis and they're not meadow-skipping or sight-seeing slowpokes either.
post #25 of 42

Much good advice above, Greenlander. I don't think anyone mentioned the PITA aspect of schlepping multiple pairs of skis via air travel, not to mention the baggage fees for transport. That said, given that you're skiing 10-15 times a year, you may be in just the right spot with the Kendos combined with renting powder boards when needed.

 

Philpug and others who mention the limits of a one ski quiver are spot on. Living in the Mountain West and skiing fifty-plus times a season as I do facilitates "the need" for "the luxury" of a multi-ski quiver -- in my case three, rationalized in my mind as groomer/bump, glade/mixed conditions, and deep powder/powder bump skis. I don't have to fly, period. So, unlike yourself, schlepping and handling are not issues for me.

 

post #26 of 42


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by OlderThanDirt View Post

Much good advice above, Greenlander. I don't think anyone mentioned the PITA aspect of schlepping multiple pairs of skis via air travel, not to mention the baggage fees for transport. That said, given that you're skiing 10-15 times a year, you may be in just the right spot with the Kendos combined with renting powder boards when needed.

 

Philpug and others who mention the limits of a one ski quiver are spot on. Living in the Mountain West and skiing fifty-plus times a season as I do facilitates "the need" for "the luxury" of a multi-ski quiver -- in my case three, rationalized in my mind as groomer/bump, glade/mixed conditions, and deep powder/powder bump skis. I don't have to fly, period. So, unlike yourself, schlepping and handling are not issues for me.

 

 

Agreed, schlepping skis is a PITA for sure. I'd rather schlepp and know that I have "MY" skis. Plus, if you "F" them up, you don't have to deal with a pissed off shop, even if you buy the insurance, its still a shitty experience. I don't blame them for being pissed, I would be too. Just more reason not to rent. Plus on a pow day your always poking around, especially if its somewhere you've never been. New snow is sometimes just enough to cover up the junk.

 

Invest in a good padded, double or triple ski bag, WITH WHEELS.....

 

The last time I traveled I shipped them UPS, ski bag inside a box to the hotel, make sure you tightly wrap duct tape around the tips and tails with foam in between the bases. Check with you local shop in the fall, and ask for a couple boxes they got from their recent shipments. Now-a-days its damn near the same price as checking them with the airline, and way less schlepping.
 

Just my .02, but all have given good advice. 

post #27 of 42

It's funny, but I see a lot of negative comments about the Volkl Mantra's on these pages.  Maybe they lack the "cool' factor these days.  I'm 6'1', weigh 200lbs, ski 40 - 50 days per year and am a lower end expert skier.  I have the Mantra's as a one ski quiver because I travel by air a lot to ski - no chance of taking two pairs.  I haven't skied the Wailers and a lot of the wider skis suggested here.  But I have skied Pontoons, Coombas, Obsethed and a couple of the wider Icelantic skis extensively.  I've found all of these wider skis great in deep powder, but they absolutely suck in anything else.  The thing I like about the Mantras is that they make a very good fist of powder (I've skied them to about 18" of fresh), but are brilliant just about everywhere else - groomers, bumps, crud, you name it.  Maybe there're other skis out there that are just as good one ski quiver, but I doubt there are any that excel it in this role.  When these skis die, another pair of Mantras will be in my bag quick-smart.

post #28 of 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor322 View Post

FIrst off, get this idea of a one ski quiver out of your head.  This is just some ski company's mktg depts hipe.  Yeah you can play a round of golf with a bag of 5 irons but dont expect to score a low score.  I ski the kendo as my everyday western ski, it handles groomers, small bumps and resort powder (6") just fine.  For powder (6"+) I have a softer wider ski (gotamas) and for racing I have sl racing skis.  My biggest suggestion would be to go with Marker Shizo binding setup.  Being able to move the boot center forward or back changes the way it skis tremendously.  For firm snow and groomers my kendos go 1cm forward if caught in unexpected powder I go back 1-1.5cm back.  This softens the tip and helps lift the tip to the surface, moving it forward and the ski becomes much more lively and a quick turner.  Like others said, learn how to ski the ski you own and think about a second ski. For me the gotama was a perfect match. 


You have gotten a whole lot of good advice here. I own 177cm Kendos with Schizos on them. I also have the new Volkl Mantra in 184cm and use them for deep snow. I only use the Mantras for true deep snow with the chance to get at some untracked sections. I love both pairs of skis. Today in the morning I skied mid-calf to knee deep snow off West Ridge at White Pass, WA. The Mantras were a blast and do anything you want. I particularly enjoy the fact that you can really let them rip big arcs in the deep. The only reason I mention the Mantras is that someone was putting them down as powder skis. At your size you might have liked the Mantra a bit better for your all rounder than the Kendos. There is such a stampede right now toward fatter skis for everything. I don't really consider the Kendos a "hard" snow ski. If we get true ice, which we do occasionally I use racing skis for free skiing, Blizzard Mag GS&SL (among others) I wouldn't get those rockered out super fat skis if I were you. Just rent them when you go to one of these fancy Western resorts and are lucky enough to "score" the goods. The only people using them for all around are the hucker kids with their GoPros. Up in SE BC on the Powder Highway they rent every kind of fat ski known to man. BTW many folks are preferring that area with resorts such as Sun Peaks to Whistler to get out of the rain. I have an embarrassingly huge quiver (20 pair+) basically get anything I want and the Kendos are in it. Only downside to Kendo is sometimes you might prefer a tighter radius. This afternoon I skied on piste on Nordica Fire Arrow Pros 180cm. You are doing fine, enjoy the Kendos as most of the time you won't be so lucky as you were in Jackson. Best to you!
post #29 of 42

Keep the Kendo for East and groomed. You might try the Atomic Coax for all purpose West. 105 under foot with a tad of rocker up front and flat in the tails. They might surprise you on groomers as well. The 2012 is a great choice as well. Very versatile east west bumps adn trees. Everything except deep POW. You will like the Coax.

post #30 of 42

Keep the Kendo for East and groomed. You might try the Atomic Coax for all purpose West. 105 under foot with a tad of rocker up front and flat in the tails. They might surprise you on groomers as well. The 2012 is a great choice as well. Very versatile east west bumps adn trees. Everything except deep POW. You will like the Coax.

 

I know a local ski shop manager who has a pair of 2012's with Salomon sth driver 16 bindings ...15 days on them for $350. 2011 piano model.Perfect shape. Great all around easy turning with pretty good edge hold on firm snow and some ice. East coaster talking here.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion
EpicSki › The Barking Bear Forums › On the Snow (Skiing Forums) › Ski Gear Discussion › Second Thoughts About Volkl Kendo