New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Am I old-fashioned?  

post #1 of 63
Thread Starter 

My 8 year old daughter just had 2 days of lessons @ Breckenridge.  She's a pretty good skier, mostly parallel on blues, still wedging on blacks.  She's been learning to race, skiing with our local "Development Team" every weekend back home in Western Mass.  Started skiing at age 4.

 

The instructor told me after day 1 that she was on her edges too much and needed to slide more, and keep her skis flat.  I guess I thought he was joking or I misunderstood him, but when I picked her up after day 2 he went further.  He said she needs to ski with flat skis and get off her edges.  She makes the mistake of following the ski's natural direction, he said.  We got a written report where he wrote under the the heading "What I need to work on" the following: "Stay off the inside edge."

 

I told him she's learning to race back East, which explains why she skis that way.  He said that does not sound right, maybe they have "heavy snow" where we normally ski.  (The opposite is true.)  I gently suggested his technique may not translate well for hardpack or gates, at which point he said he had been working the bumps with the kids.

 

Well I understand why you need pretty flat skis in bumps, and why one needs to slide or jump-turn in tight steep spots, but to me it seems these are the easy things to learn after you've mastered the hard stuff, i.e. carving on the steeps and firm stuff.  I know  they didn't spend the whole day in bumps or take a "bumps lesson", so I can't understand why you'd want to confuse a bunch of 8 year olds.

 

Am I just a no fun, old fashioned, ski geek?  Don't kids learn sliding and other maneuvers on their own?

 

I always figured you should carve unless you're in a situation where it's not called for (powder/crud/bumps) or where there's no time or space (steep chutes, trees). Won't the sliding and rescue maneuvers come naturally enough if you master the basics?

post #2 of 63

This should be fun... You're right. The instructor was full of it. That is however pretty typical of a PSIA instructor to have an obvious "disconnect" with racing... or using the edges of the skis for that matter. FWIW, you really don't need a flat ski in bumps unless you're trying to be a WC bump skier... That is another discussion I suppose. Anyway, if I were you, I wouldn't pay for another lesson. Be prepared for a bunch of "why the instructor might have been right" and "we need video of your daughter to determine what she needs to improve" posts following this one; and probably one or two about why "HeluvaSkier is wrong and can only ski blue groomers". In the end, go with your gut instinct on this one. If the training your daughter is getting at home is delivering results, then stick with that.

 

BTW, Jiminy?

post #3 of 63

Is it possible he meant both inside edges at the same time?  From her feet being too far apart?  Even in a wedge you use your inside edges.

 

I don't know why anyone would be told not to use their edges that has been skiing for four years and could do it under control.  I'm fairly new to this so maybe someone else will jump in and give a reason.

 

FWIW, I'm PSIA and I race.  There's a fairly good chance, the training she's getting at your home mountain is from PSIA instructors too.

 

Beats me,

Ken

post #4 of 63

Well those are quite some generalizations there Helluva!   

 

 

post #5 of 63

I guess his statements would be a Helluva generalization.  biggrin.gif

post #6 of 63

Sounds strange....but then you havent offered much to make a real assessment.

 

I find it hard to believe an 8 year old was carving through bumps.  So was likely all over the place and struggling.  In that situation learning some steeering is not a bad thing. But I would never explain steering as "not using your edges".   

 

I suspect she normally skis by using a simple "outrigger" style.  Somthing common with young kids in race programs.

 

Either way, seems she had pretty rookie instructors on the trip, and if my outrigger theory is correct, then at home too.

 

 

PS: Heluva can only ski blue groomers so dont listen to him.

post #7 of 63

To the original poster, I think you are correct. I've always thought that the ski should be used so that it follows its naturally direction and that turns should be carved whenever possible. It seems to me that a lot of instructors could use a little more edge angle and a little less speed control in their skiing, but I'm old-fashioned too.

post #8 of 63
Quote:
HeluvaSkier is wrong

You're right, Heluva. You really ought to think twice--or at last once--before you post such drivel.

What a bunch of foolish crap you've just posted. First, you don't even know if the instructor in question was affiliated with PSIA or not. Nor do you (or I) have any idea how much or how little experience this instructor has. Second, within PSIA's ranks are top racers and former racers. But even for the mogul specialists in PSIA, edging skill remains one of the three basic and critically important skills of skiing. Yes, there are also inexperienced instructors out there--lots of them. But there is not an instructor in the world who does not recognize the significance of edging. Third, you have not seen the student ski, so it is beyond absurd for you or anyone else here to simply dismiss the opinion of an instructor who has actually skied with her. It is certainly possible that she tends to be too edge-locked and loses control of her line as a result--happens quite commonly. You must know that. It's also possible that the instructor is missing the mark. But you don't know. Nor do I.

---

HiRustler--are you quoting the instructor, or paraphrasing in your own words? It does seem unlikely to me that an instructor--even an inexperienced one--would say things quite in the way you phrased them here. Edges and carving skills are very important for good skiing, of course, and it sounds like your daughter has learned well to tip her skis up on edge. That's definitely a strength. But there are skiers who over-edge, compromising their ability to control both line and speed. It's not that they would need to "ski with flat skis and get off [their] edges," so much as that they need to learn to blend their movements and develop additional skills to increase versatility and prevent pure "edge-lock." Today's skis carve so easily simply by being tipped on their edges, but without some more sophisticated skill blending, railed-out carves give little more control of line than a freight train locked on its tracks. Is it possible that your daughter does this? Railed-out carves are particularly ineffective in bumps, so it would not be inappropriate for the instructor to address that problem if that is the terrain they were working on.

The instructor should have been simply suggesting an area of focus for continued improvement, and it is likely that this is what he or she was working on with your daughter. If tipping the skis and getting them to track and carve is a strength in your daughter's skiing, a competent instructor might well have simply tried to build on that strength and increase her versatility by exploring alternatives and other skill blends. If she truly does tend to rail out her skis, she will become faster in the gates when she learns to shape her turns and control her line more precisely--even as she continues to enjoy the carving performance of her skis.

In any case, you wrote that the written feedback was simply, "Stay off the inside edge." This comment suggests perhaps an entirely different problem. "Inside edge" is somewhat vague, unfortunately--could refer to the little toe edge of the inside foot of the turn (left edge of the left ski in a left turn), but I doubt that this is what the instructor meant, since it is not usually a problem. More likely, it could refer to the big toe edge of the inside ski, which is very much a problem. It typically results from leaning and twisting the upper body strongly into the turn, causing the inside ski to hook up on its big-toe (ie. "wrong") edge, essentially preventing the turn. Forceful upper body exertions like I'm describing to literally "derail" the skis from their tracks are a common sign of a skier who has learned only to tip the skis and carve. It's possible....

"Railroad tracks" are a great drill, and can demonstrate important skill. But pure edge-locked railroad tracks make bumps just about impossible. Even in racing, where clean, "carved" turns are paramount, the ability to shape a turn with high level edge control (ie., not just tipping them up to the same angle all the time) as well as fine-tuned steering skills, is critical. Without knowing more about your daughter and her skiing, and the lessons she has received, we can only surmise what is going on. But before you just dismiss the instructor's feedback, I recommend skiing with her and exploring more about what she does, what she can do, and what the instructor did with her. You might also want to consider taking a lesson yourself to boost your own understanding and skills, and to help coach your daughter accurately. Breckenridge has a number of very good instructors available to take you both to the next level.

Enjoy!

Best regards,
Bob Barnes
post #9 of 63



I'm going to use a little of Bob's post to give another point of view on the subject. My comments are in red at the end of his original post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barnes View Post



Quote:
HeluvaSkier is wrong



........................ there are skiers who over-edge, compromising their ability to control both line and speed. It's not that they would need to "ski with flat skis and get off [their] edges," so much as that they need to learn to blend their movements and develop additional skills to increase versatility and prevent pure "edge-lock.", in soft western snow.
 

 

 

Heluva,  In your world this would be called a brushed carve (minus any rotation of course which has not been discussed by the original poster or anybody else in this thread.)  You may want to go open "your" books again and read a bit.
 

 

post #10 of 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by hirustler View Post

She's a pretty good skier, mostly parallel on blues, still wedging on blacks.

 



I'm no instructor but I've skied for a while and taught kids other things.  Are you guys missing the above?  If she wedges on blacks it means to me that she wedges when feeling challenged.  She's challenged by bumps.  She could be wedging.  Go back and read the OP's description of what he was told.  She's riding the inside edge too much and needs to flatten her skis.  If she's wedging down the moguls, then that would be a fair description of what she should do.  Or am I incorrect?

post #11 of 63


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Posaune View Post





I'm no instructor but I've skied for a while and taught kids other things.  Are you guys missing the above?  If she wedges on blacks it means to me that she wedges when feeling challenged.  She's challenged by bumps.  She could be wedging.  Go back and read the OP's description of what he was told.  She's riding the inside edge too much and needs to flatten her skis.  If she's wedging down the moguls, then that would be a fair description of what she should do.  Or am I incorrect?



That's what I read, too. Also not an instructor. But a parent.

post #12 of 63

If the OP's account is accurate, the words that catch me are 'needs to to keep off her edges'-Bumps can be skied with relatively a lot of edge and carving movements, or a pretty flat drifty ski, or a combo of both (Bob Barnes bump compilation video coupled with the best of Joey Cordeau's montages all very available on epic demonstrate the very diverse ways experts can ski bumps).  

 

I'm not sure why using carving movements (if that is what she was doing and that is what the instructor meant) would ever be something to steer an 8 year old away from,  but I can see why you might also teach side-slipping, drifting and some flat skiing as well-but i wouldn't teach that edging/ carving was a problem with someone's skiing.  And, that's the impression I got from the the OP, that he was being told there was something wrong with using edging as the basis of turning.

post #13 of 63

As usual, Bob B has it right.

I've never tell a parent that a kid is edging too much, but I often say that their kid is defensive and not ready for steep terrain, which is essentially the same thing. Not many 8 year olds carve turns, if they are on their edges they are mostly braking. 

Riding an edge is the easy skill with modern skis.  The harder skill is releasing, gliding and re-engaging without losing energy.  It sounds to me like the OP got good advice, but he didn't hear the whole story.

 

BK

post #14 of 63
Thread Starter 

OK I'm back.  I knew I'd have to clarify, 

 

These are direct quotes.  Granted, at pickup there's not a lot of time to chat when 5 other parents want a report also.  By "inside edge" he meant the uphill edge of the downhill ski.  I'm quite sure of this because I asked him to clarify, and I just couldn't believe it.

 

I agree she may be overedging on moguls and steep terrain as a defensive maneuver, but she's only 8 and weighs 50lbs.  She'll learn how to ski this terrain soon enough, with or without professional instruction.

 

I'm not familiar with the term "outrigger style."

 

Bob, as far as your comments go, as you can imagine, this 50 lb 8 yr old isn't doing railed out carves, especially not in the bumps.  I am certainly not an instructor, and not very well versed in the lingo you guys use, but to suggest I take lessons so I can understand what this misdirected instructor is trying to teach my daughter seems a little strange.  I've skied 41 yrs, since age 3.  I raced from age 10-21.  I am comfortable and aggressive on all types of terrain.  Who knows, maybe I'm even "better" than her instructor!  I imagine anyone could learn from a lesson, but I may not be the typical parent you have in mind.

 

Bode, I agree with your premise, except that there are plenty of little kids that are actually carving, not just braking.  My 6 yr twins olds certainly are carving, just not on all terrain nor in all situations.

 

I posted because, like Ghost, I'm in the camp that loves to carve and follow the skis natural course.  Sure you need to slide or steer to shape your turn as dictated by terrain and obstacles, but this is one of the great joys of skiing.  I was so proud of my kids for learning this skill.  Then this instructor made me think I must be some kind of dinosaur, and made me wonder if they're getting bad advice from me and their instructors back East.  Well, either I am a dinosaur, or some of the instructors here are just naturally coming to the defense of a wayward colleague.

 

Oh yea, Berkshire East is the local hill.  They have a pretty well regarded race program.

 

I have to say, even though I mostly disagree with her instructor, it did open my eyes to the other aspects of skiing that I assumed were learned on the fly (since I have a racing background) but I suppose could actually be taught.

 

 

 


Edited by hirustler - 3/7/11 at 10:19am
post #15 of 63

My son, who is 8, is also in the B'east Devo Program (did you do the parent kid race on SaturdaY)?  B'east race coaches are the real deal, ripping skiers, and teach excellent skills...and, at least on the devo team, did bump runs with the kids every week (the coaches used  a very carvy style of bump skiing and looked great, and some of the kids had it down as well.  Some, not all-but that's the case no matter what style your teaching).

 

So was the 'less inside edge' bump specific advice or advice for general 8 year old development?  Did he want your daughter to also manage her up-hill ski edges with the same energy as her downhill, big-toe edge?   There is definitely room for kids to learn dynamic side-slipping and feathering edges (though in a 2 day vacation lesson for 8 year olds it seems a bit of stretch to make that foundational), but I think getting her to make dynamic carving movements on most terrain makes more sense.  But again, I guess there may be a real disconnect between this instructor's intentions and his words.  

 

Or, maybe, he's just not used to seeing 8 year olds who can carve a turn (Lot's of visitors to B'East often comment to me on how many strong youth skiers there are on that hill).

 

In the end, it doesn't really matter-the race program at her home hill (and the free skiing time with her peers-which is huge for my boy) will define her skiing more than a two day lesson on vacation at age 8.

 

Liam

 

 

 

 

post #16 of 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by hirustler View Post

OK I'm back.  I knew I'd have to clarify, 

 

These are direct quotes.  Granted, at pickup there's not a lot of time to chat when 5 other parents want a report also.  By "inside edge" he meant the uphill edge of the downhill ski.  I'm quite sure of this because I asked him to clarify, and I just couldn't believe it.

 

I agree she may be overedging on moguls and steep terrain as a defensive maneuver, but she's only 8 and weighs 50lbs.  She'll learn how to ski this terrain soon enough, with or without professional instruction.

 

I'm not familiar with the term "outrigger style."  People that are new to being on their edges, and most kids, tend to have one ski pretty much under them and the outside ski extended, like an outrigger on a boat.  I think this previals with kids for a few reasons; strength, confidence and motor skills.

 

Bob, as far as your comments go, as you can imagine, this 50 lb 8 yr old isn't doing railed out carves, especially not in the bumps.  I am certainly not an instructor, and not very well versed in the lingo you guys use, but to suggest I take lessons so I can understand what this misdirected instructor is trying to teach my daughter seems a little strange.  I've skied 41 yrs, since age 3.  I raced from age 10-21.  I am comfortable and aggressive on all types of terrain.  Who knows, maybe I'm even "better" than her instructor!  I imagine anyone could learn from a lesson, but I may not be the typical parent you have in mind.  Some instructors don't like it but I usually let parents tag along as long as they don't interferre.  I can then point things out and they know exactly what I'm talking about.  Maybe next time around you can do that. 

 

Don't dismiss what Bob said too quickley.  Even if he didn't understand your abilities, much has changed in the world of skiing and the lingo so taking a refresher course or doing some reading (Encyclopedia of Skiing, anything by Ron LeMaster - there are many more) could be helpful.  Don't think instructors are the top skiers on the mountain.  Many are, but many aren't.  I would fall into the latter (this is my 6 year skiing and only 4th on shaped skis).

 

Bode, I agree with your premise, except that there are plenty of little kids that are actually carving, not just braking.  My 6 yr twins olds certainly are carving, just not on all terrain nor in all situations.

 

I posted because, like Ghost, I'm in the camp that loves to carve and follow the skis natural course.  Sure you need to slide or steer to shape your turn as dictated by terrain and obstacles, but this is one of the great joys of skiing.  I was so proud of my kids for learning this skill.  Then this instructor made me think I must be some kind of dinosaur, and made me wonder if they're getting bad advice from me and their instructors back East.  Well, either I am a dinosaur, or some of the instructors here are just naturally coming to the defense of a wayward colleague.  I think everyone is still just trying to understand.

 

Oh yea, Berkshire East is the local hill.  They have a pretty well regarded race program.

 

I have to say, even though I mostly disagree with her instructor, it did open my eyes to the other aspects of skiing that I assumed were learned on the fly (since I have a racing background) but I suppose could actually be taught.

 

 

 



 

 

post #17 of 63

hirustler, it behooves every skier to learn to master steering skills.  Carving limits your speed control and turn shape options.  Steering opens a door to a full array of them.  If your child struggles on steeper slopes, learning good steering skills is a good first step to escaping the defensive wedge that emerges on that terrain.  Too much edge angle can be a detriment to steering.  It can lock the ski in an arc, and restrict the skiers ability to steer it.  Reducing the edge angle releases the lock, and allows the skis to be easily and precisely steered.  While possibly not presented in the most clear manner, I'd give the instructor the benefit of the doubt.  Rather than discouraging your daughter from eventually learning to carve well, he may have been simply trying to expand the parameters of her foundation skill base.  The foundation is what supports the building of a magnificent house.  Know what I mean?  

post #18 of 63



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Barnes View Post



Quote:
HeluvaSkier is wrong



You're right, Heluva. You really ought to think twice--or at last once--before you post such drivel.

What a bunch of foolish crap you've just posted. First, you don't even know if the instructor in question was affiliated with PSIA or not. Nor do you (or I) have any idea how much or how little experience this instructor has. Second, within PSIA's ranks are top racers and former racers. But even for the mogul specialists in PSIA, edging skill remains one of the three basic and critically important skills of skiing. Yes, there are also inexperienced instructors out there--lots of them. But there is not an instructor in the world who do does not recognize the significance of edging. Third, you have not seen the student ski, so it is beyond absurd for you or anyone else here to simply dismiss the opinion of an instructor who has actually skied with her. It is certainly possible that she tends to be too edge-locked and loses control of her line as a result--happens quite commonly. You must know that. It's also possible that the instructor is missing the mark. But you don't know. Nor do I.
 



You realize just posted everything that I predicted you [or someone] would. In reading, it is quite apparent that I carefully considered each of your points [likely many more] before making that post... even going so far as predicting all of the responses to it and the thread. In fact after reading them, I think it is safe to say that I could have written them myself on everyone's behalf. I should have even been able to predict that me being "wrong" was a clear opportunity for you to be "right". I've said my peice though. It sounds like the OP is technically proficient enough and has a background that would allow him to make an informed decision based on his own knowledge.

 

BTW - thanks Skidude72; without your post it wouldn't have been a "right on all counts" prediction. wink.gif

post #19 of 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeluvaSkier View Post

 I think it is safe to say that I could have written them myself on everyone's behalf. 



Please do so in the future, Greg.  That would save me a lot of time.  

post #20 of 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick View Post

Please do so in the future, Greg.  That would save me a lot of time.  



 I wouldn't want to put anyone out of a job... wink.gif

post #21 of 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeluvaSkier View Post





 I wouldn't want to put anyone out of a job... wink.gif


Not to worry, my young disciple.  I'm old now.  I'm not going to be doing this forever.  I need to start grooming someone to take over for me as the perverted purveyor of pivoting and steering.  wink.gif

 

post #22 of 63
Thanks for the reply, HiRustler, and for the added detail and clarity. Again, without actually being there and seeing your daughter and the intent and activities of her class, all we can do is speculate, at best. At this point, I would really love to see how your daughter actually skis.

I am certainly not trying to defend your daughter's instructor. I don't know who he was, or really, what he did in the class. But I have not heard enough yet to condemn him either. You suggest that he was "misdirected," and it is possible. But I'm not yet convinced that his advice was not really what your daughter needed at the time. If he really thought that carving is "bad," or truly meant that tipping skis on edge is a mistake, as you appear to suggest, I would be very, very surprised. That's just not what I'd expect any instructor, even a very inexperienced one, to actually mean (regardless of the words he may have used), so it is quite likely that there was a miscommunication (not that the instructor could not be considered at fault, at least partially, for that as well). I also know--rather well, in fact--many of the trainers for the Breckenridge Ski School, and I can assure you that what you have understood the instructor to say is not at all what they would have trained that instructor to teach.

Just so you know where I'm coming from, in any case, you should realize that no one enjoys carving turns and leaving clean tracks more than I do. And even more than that, no one has ever advocated gliding "offensive" skiing vs. braking (as a habit) more passionately than I have--search EpicSki for "slow line fast" and other related terms if you want to know more about where I stand on these things. I am definitely not coming from a "flatter skis are better" platform. I too would be proud of your daughter's learning to ride her edges and carve turns.

But the fact is, I have seen far too many skiers, including "50 lb 8 yr olds," who can do nothing more than park and ride on high edges, riding the rails with virtually no control of either direction or speed. I'm not saying that your daughter skis that way--I don't know her and I've never seen her ski--but from the description and the instructor's comments, I cannot discount it either. Today's deep sidecut skis make it incredibly easy to do that, with very little skill required to simply stand on the sides of your feet and go for a ride. Carving is one of the simplest things you can do on today's skis--sometimes accomplished by accident by first-time beginners merely because they're out of balance. Riding the rails is easy. Controlled carving is not. (I was once run over by an out-of-control edge-locked skier who proclaimed that it was my fault because "you were in my carve, dude." Sorry, dude!)

You said, "I agree she may be overedging on moguls and steep terrain as a defensive maneuver, but she's only 8 and weighs 50lbs. She'll learn how to ski this terrain soon enough, with or without professional instruction. Yes, she probably will. But one job of the pro is to help accelerate learning, and to help forestall bad habits. If over-edging and lack of skill blending and steering skills is, in fact, your daughter's most significant issue in the terrain she was skiing, the instructor would have been remiss had he not tried to address it.

I would not suggest that over-edging is necessarily defensive, either, although it could be. I do have an image in my mind, based not on actually seeing your daughter ski, of course, but on your descriptions filtered through over thirty years of dedicated ski teaching. I could be dead wrong, but I picture your daughter gliding on high edge angles, making clean tracks on gentle, wide-open terrain, but forcefully trying to twist her upper body around to twist her skis when she wants to stop or slow down, or to ski a path other than where her skis want to take her. It's "on" or "off"--either carve completely or twist and skid to yank the skis off their tracks. Perhaps this is not how she skis, and I'm willing to be proven wrong by seeing her in person (or on video). But if this is even remotely her style, then working on shaping skills and exploring the gray area between "off and on" would indeed be appropriate for her continued development as a skier.

If you don't mind, let me ask you a question: how well can your daughter follow your tracks (and keep up) as you make a variety of different sizes and shapes of turns, including some that are significantly shorter-radius than she can carve, and shorter-radius turns that arc back uphill? How does she do it (with what movements)? This is a good diagnostic test, as well as a tactical drill that might be all she needs to start developing the requisite skill blends needed to accomplish it. Sounds like she's a pretty good little athlete, so she might just figure out the movements on her own if you provide her the task that requires them. (Following tracks while trying to keep up, by the way, is entirely offensive, as it entails controlling direction with minimal loss of speed--even if it requires some skidding or brushing to accomplish it.)

On that note, it's helpful to understand that, while carving is generally offensive, not all offensive turns are purely carved. I put offensive turns squarely in the middle of a spectrum of intents (see illustration that follows) with pure-carving on one end, and pure braking ("hockey stops") on the other. I define "turning" as "going where you want to go"--just as you might define it in a car, or on ice skates, a bicycle, a boat, or just turning when walking down a sidewalk. Turning reflects the intent to control your line precisely, and it is completely offensive--a pure "go" thought. Braking is defensive, of course--the intent to control speed (a "stop" thought--the opposite of "go"). Carving is offensive too, but as you and others have suggested, pure carving involves largely letting the skis--not you--dictate your line. It can be lots of fun, and it is something I very much enjoy doing. It certainly is not about slowing down or stopping, but since you've largely given directional control to your skis, it is not really about controlling your direction precisely either, is it? In "pure turns," directional control is paramount and pure carving, while nice, comes second in priority. Pure turns are "as carved as possible," but they may well involve some brushing or skidding especially when the desired line is of a tighter radius than you can carve. Pure carves happen with no more than tipping the skis. Pure turns involve considerably more sophisticated technique, including the full range of possible movements and skiing skills (edging control, pressure control, and rotary control).

The "Spectrum of Intents":
500

So assuming that the instructor is not completely off the mark, if I may attempt to interpret his feedback (or to offer a different perspective if he is off the mark), I'll suggest that he may have meant that your daughter was working on adding rotary and pressure control skills to her repertoire, as well as refining her edging skills. Edging skill, like the other skills, is as much about knowing when and how to reduce the edge angle as how to increase it, as much about releasing the edges and "feathering" the edges as about gripping tenaciously with them. These are things we can all stand to improve on, at any level, and it sounds quite likely that they would be good things for your daughter to explore--regardless of what her instructor may have said or intended.

And on that note, please do not be offended by my suggestion that you might enjoy and benefit from some instruction yourself. It is not just beginners, weak skiers, or skiers who have "problems" who need lessons. No one, of course, "needs" a lesson, but we all have things we can learn. The best skiers (and athletes in any sport) get coaching--plenty of it. I am sure that you are an accomplished skier, but that gives you all the more reason to continue learning and exploring. As you say, you may in fact be a more accomplished skier than many instructors--perhaps even most of them. But all good instructors get coaching on a regular basis too, both formally and through continued exploration and feedback from their peers. Top racers nearly always outski their coaches, but that does not negate the value of the coaching. What are you working on in your own skiing these days? A good instructor will fascinate you with new focuses, new frontiers, new sensations and movements and understandings that will challenge you and inspire you to new heights, no matter how strong a skier you are!

Indeed, HiRustler, my recommendation that you might like a lesson is intended as a compliment, based on your questions and the assumption that you are inquisitive and eager to continue learning and growing in this great sport, as all truly great skiers are.

I wish you continued success and many great turns, and I hope that your daughter will continue to thrive and learn and love this awesome sport.

Best regards,
Bob Barnes
post #23 of 63
Quote:
You realize just posted everything that I predicted you [or someone] would.

Good for you, Heluva. No, it does not mean that you considered anything at all or that, as Rick has suggested, you should not have actually taken the time to write the things you "predicted" others would write if you did "consider" them. I stand by my assertion that it is beyond folly to dismiss off-hand the suggestions of an instructor who has actually skied with a student when you have not even seen the student make a single turn, and to generalize about an instructor whose background you know nothing about--much less an organization that you also appear to know nothing about, and that the instructor may or may not have had any training from or affiliation with in the first place. I agree with Bud's implication that your gross generalizations are neither impressive nor evidence of a strong intellect. I'm glad, though, that you're having fun.

Best regards,
Bob
post #24 of 63
Quote:
hirustler, it behooves every skier to learn to master steering skills. Carving limits your speed control and turn shape options. Steering opens a door to a full array of them. If your child struggles on steeper slopes, learning good steering skills is a good first step to escaping the defensive wedge that emerges on that terrain. Too much edge angle can be a detriment to steering. It can lock the ski in an arc, and restrict the skiers ability to steer it. Reducing the edge angle releases the lock, and allows the skis to be easily and precisely steered. While possibly not presented in the most clear manner, I'd give the instructor the benefit of the doubt. Rather than discouraging your daughter from eventually learning to carve well, he may have been simply trying to expand the parameters of her foundation skill base. The foundation is what supports the building of a magnificent house. Know what I mean?

Nicely stated, Rick! I'll second that....

Best regards,
Bob
post #25 of 63

duel.gifpopcorn.gif

post #26 of 63

hirustler,

 

There's nothing quite like an old-fashioned mudslinging match on the internet biggrin.gif

 

Stick to your daughter's racing program where she sees the same coaches week after week and you can validate the coach's teaching by times in the gates.

post #27 of 63

"Wedging on blacks." Why would you take a child on expert terrain that reduces her to beginner maneuvers? You may have caused your child to develop defensive skiing tactics that  will be difficult for her to move beyond.

post #28 of 63
Quote:
you may have noted that one very senior examiner from PSIA Rocky Mountain called them drivel, foolish crap, and absurd in his long-winded post.

Actually, SharpEdges, those words did not at all refer to "the origins of this problem" (that "the return customer rate for ski school lessons is abysmally low at most mountains nationwide"), but to some quite ill-thought-out words from another poster. I agree entirely with the both the problem you refer to, and "the origins" of it. With typically short-lived instructor careers and egregious turn-over rates in many ski schools, the average level of experience and training of today's instructors is very low, and the numbers of truly dedicated and experienced pros dwindles daily. But that is another issue entirely, unrelated to this discussion other than the possibility (that I have acknowledged) that the instructor in question may well have had little experience or training. Or he may have had a lot. We do not know, at this point.

Best regards,
Bob Barnes
post #29 of 63
Thread Starter 

Bob:  I'm starting to understand what this instructor may have been getting at. I read your last post very carefully, and you may be onto something.  I think she may be all carving or nothing, ie there is some awkwardness,like a twisting of her upper body when she needs to change direction quickly, stop or go anywhere her skis wouldn't naturally lead.  I also noticed that her younger twin sibs do this much less, and can follow me way more closely through a variety of turn shapes and terrain types at a pretty good speed. 

 

It's fascinating that after all these years of "just doing it," i.e. skiing real hard, that now I'm in the position of actually breaking it down and explaining it, because I have kids.  I never heard the word steering until I signed onto to this site a few months ago. Must not have been a phrase coaches used back in the 70s/80s.  I thought of skiing as carving, but after reading these and other posts I'm pretty sure I'm doing a fine job of steering but I just never really thought about it.  After 1000 days on skis, to some extent it may be second nature.  But I can see now why one sould teach it.

 

But I still maintan you don't tell an 8 year old to get off her edges and stop carving.  Maybe he's just the twintip/park dude @ Breck ski school, a style of skiing I admit to being out of touch with.  He's probably a decent teacher, but could take a more balanced approach.  This lesson was a general lesson, not a mogul lesson or a park lesson or a steeps lesson or anything else.

 

Telerod:  I wonder if you have kids, or forgot what it was like to be one.  You think it was my idea to do black diamonds with them?  They're dying to ski the steeps, even if they do dial it back a little.  Can't keep 'em away.  I was the same way when I was 6, 7, 8...  I really believe that whatever technical mistakes they commit now on the steeps won't scar them forever.  In fact I'm quite sure that the more they ski the steeps, the closer they get to nailing it.  But I try to keep them on blues too, where they can really rip and be confident.

 

Liam, I did ski the father daugher race. My girl is in Chivonne's group.  She's an awesome coach!  My daughter collecting that 2nd place medal was one of the greatest moment she's ever had.

 

Anyway, I do appreciate the thoughtful input here.  You do need somewhat of a tough skin to post around here.  I'm pretty confident I have sound technique, but it's good to learn how to explain it to the next generation so they can have just as much fun. 

 

Peter

post #30 of 63
Quote:
Maybe he's just the twintip/park dude @ Breck ski school, a style of skiing I admit to being out of touch with.

Yes, Peter (HiRustler), it's often said that the park is a "flat ski zone." Perhaps this instructor is a park rat. I'm certain that all instructors at Breckenridge have received a fair amount of classic skiing skills training, at least, but it's also true that those who spend most of their free time in the park may be biased toward pivoting, spinning, low-edge-angle skiing. I agree with you that no one should be told anything that resembles "carving is bad," even if excessive edging and lack of steering skills causes problems. I suspect that your instructor was simply trying to balance your daughter's skills, but I agree that it would be frustrating if it comes out as "what you're doing is bad."

Basic offensive turns, with the intent to precisely control direction, are the cornerstone of great skiing. The skills developed in practicing them are adaptable to all conditions, techniques, and intents. With well-developed basic turning skills, it's easy to adjust the movements to make pure railroad track carves, or to pivot the skis into an intentional skid for hockey stops, as desired. Basic steered turns are the "mother turn," representing the foundational, "default" movement patterns and skill blend of great skiing. As Rick has suggested, they build a strong foundation for the diverse spectrum of intents and needs of all great skiing.

---

And you're right--you need to have a strong "noise-canceling filter" around here these days!

wink.gif

Best regards.
Bob Barnes
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Instruction & Coaching
This thread is locked