New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Salomon's New BBR Ski

post #1 of 44
Thread Starter 

IMG_0111.jpg

Bertrand Kraft, the "shaper" who designed Salomon's popular X-Scream, Pocket Rocket, and AK Rocket skis, has come up with his signature model, the BBR. His nickname is Beber, he signs his name BBR, and his signature is actually on the tail of the ski:

IMG_0113.jpg

Kraft wanted to build a ski that was all about "Freedom, Adventure, Fun" -- not about dimensions, which seemed to him to be a simplistic way of thinking and talking about skis. To Kraft, dimensions don't matter, a ski should be more about FUN. One of his passions is watersports, where he found that people tend to talk more about how much fun they had and not about technique or product specs as they do in skiing circles. He wanted to create a ski that must be experienced, not categorized.  

 

The BBR's distinctive V-Shape makes it look unlike any ski on the market, and also makes it ski like "two skis in one." It's a powder ski that carves on piste and a carver that surfs in powder. Such a ski could be that "one quiver" ski that the majority of customers want. At early season ski tests in Europe, we were told, people liked the skis so much they preferred them over their personal skis. The ski's narrow waist and pintail make it carve like a race ski on hardpack. The wide tip and rocker make it act like a surfboard in powder. It skis short, is extremely lightweight, and is super forgiving. As our own Boot Guy and ESA Coach Bud Heishman said, "It didn't ski anything like it looked."  

 

The promotion to launch the ski for 2012 is called the Shape Your Adventure Tour at 50 resorts worldwide. To find out when it will be in your vicinity, check the Salomon BBR page on Facebook. There's a demo tomorrow, 2/12 at Kirkwood...

post #2 of 44

Skiied these last week at a ski demo....really versetile and playful ski. 

post #3 of 44
I should have tried the pair we had available at the EpicSki Academy in Aspen last month. Although they sure look odd, one thing does intrigue me about that shape. In a way, when tipped on edge on firm snow, I would expect the ski to feel very much like a narrower ski with the same sidecut radius, when skiing in a pair of "abducted stance" boots. They might well carve better than they look on hard snow, and I would certainly expect the tips to float fairly well in powder.

Call me intrigued. Not sold yet, but intrigued, and willing to give them a shot, with the benefit of the doubt.

(On the other hand, if the past is any predictor, the Pocket Rocket was among my least favorite skis, ever!)

Best regards,
Bob
post #4 of 44

 

"Kraft wanted to build a ski that was all about "Freedom, Adventure, Fun" -- not about dimensions, which seemed to him to be a simplistic way of thinking and talking about skis. To Kraft, dimensions don't matter, a ski should be more about FUN. One of his passions is watersports, where he found that people tend to talk more about how much fun they had and not about technique or product specs as they do in skiing circles. He wanted to create a ski that must be experienced, not categorized."

 

Right.....?

I'm an addicted windsurfer and beginner surfer.

I'd rather go to Maui than Utah most days.

I can assure you that serious surfers and windsurfers are as geeked on equipment as any.

My personal windsurfing quiver consists of seven boards, twelve sails, nine masts, five booms and assorted bits to put it all together.

Along with this goes a surfboard, a stand up paddle board, a kayak and a trailer to put it all in.

Laird Hamilton has a huge warehouse to store his approximatly 100 big wave boards in.  

 

Kraft could have something with these skis but I'm pretty skeptical.

My experience is that a tool which fits all sizes doesn't really fit any very well!

My own one ski traveling quiver is an old pair Volkl AC4 82 mm skis in 170.

They carve just like a Volkl and sure beat a pair of straight 205 GS skis in the powder (which we used to think was pretty good).

post #5 of 44

I don't get it. I ski that is not about dimensions? It has dimensions. Salomon did not randomly generate some numbers to make the ski. Though I have heard good things about the ski, a few of my friends have been out on it. 

 

People at the high levels of any sport become, for the most part, gear heads that sometimes overly dwell on numbers and what the new big thing might be. This ski is not just some silly idea that is about "fun" not sure why they need to put out a press release that is so obviously just a marketing tactic for a new idea in ski dimensions. 

post #6 of 44
Thread Starter 

It's a spirit thing. I wrote the article after talking to one of the marketing people, just to be clear about the origins of the copy in the OP. I thought it was a cool concept--of course the ski has a dimensions, sidecut, and the like, but what makes it interesting is the "two skis in one" concept of its design. A ski that does it all really well would be revolutionary, no?

 

Surely you agree that there's more to a ski than its dimensions, such as the materials in its construction and their architecture. The point Salomon's marketing person was trying to make was that the designer set out not to make an '88' or what have you, but to design a ski purely for fun. 

 

The ski does look like fun.

post #7 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolo View Post

It's a spirit thing. I wrote the article after talking to one of the marketing people, just to be clear about the origins of the copy in the OP. I thought it was a cool concept--of course the ski has a dimensions, sidecut, and the like, but what makes it interesting is the "two skis in one" concept of its design. A ski that does it all really well would be revolutionary, no?

 

Surely you agree that there's more to a ski than its dimensions, such as the materials in its construction and their architecture. The point Salomon's marketing person was trying to make was that the designer set out not to make an '88' or what have you, but to design a ski purely for fun. 

 

The ski does look like fun.



I don't own any skis that are not fun......

 

Marketing crap

post #8 of 44
Thread Starter 

rolleyes.gif Strangely enough, I think this ski was designed for you, RS. Try to wade past the marketing BS and demo the ski when it's in your neighborhood--and report back.  

post #9 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolo View Post

rolleyes.gif Strangely enough, I think this ski was designed for you, RS. Try to wade past the marketing BS and demo the ski when it's in your neighborhood--and report back.  



But a one ski quiver is the LAST thing I want  biggrin.gif

post #10 of 44

I saw my hero at Reno airport, he had 6 skis along with him for his trip!  Rossi Smash, that was in my quiver long ago, don't know where that one went.  That was from the ski shop that claimed that K2 had NEVER made a red white and blue ski!

post #11 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by don_weber View Post

I saw my hero at Reno airport, he had 6 skis along with him for his trip!  Rossi Smash, that was in my quiver long ago, don't know where that one went.  That was from the ski shop that claimed that K2 had NEVER made a red white and blue ski!



I wasn't at the Reno Airport....must have been some other good looking guy. 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #12 of 44


Feb 15, 2011

 

Cool looking skis.  First thing that popped in my mind was that the skis were from the movie Avatar.  Must be the muted blue and orange coloring and snazzy shape.

 

Think snow,

 

CP
 

post #13 of 44

LOL, the muted blue and orange colouring made me think "Dynastar" at first sight.

post #14 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlieP View Post


Feb 15, 2011

 

Cool looking skis.  First thing that popped in my mind was that the skis were from the movie Avatar.  Must be the muted blue and orange coloring and snazzy shape.

 

Think snow,

 

CP
 



Haha. 

 

the blue is from the Pocket Rocket. 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #15 of 44
Would this ski's "pintail" be some effort to reduce knee injuries?
post #16 of 44
Sure looks a lot like a larger version of the Axendo series. I haven't found a Salomon worth skiing on inn the last decade +. If I'm healed up next year, I might have to give these a whirl, but I don't know that the would translate well to the style of skiing I do today. Certainly not for tele...
post #17 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolo View Post

IMG_0111.jpg

Bertrand Kraft, the "shaper" who designed Salomon's popular X-Scream, Pocket Rocket, and AK Rocket skis, has come up with his signature model, the BBR. His nickname is Beber, he signs his name BBR, and his signature is actually on the tail of the ski:

IMG_0113.jpg

Kraft wanted to build a ski that was all about "Freedom, Adventure, Fun" -- not about dimensions, which seemed to him to be a simplistic way of thinking and talking about skis. To Kraft, dimensions don't matter, a ski should be more about FUN. One of his passions is watersports, where he found that people tend to talk more about how much fun they had and not about technique or product specs as they do in skiing circles. He wanted to create a ski that must be experienced, not categorized.  

 

 

I get the point, but I pray we don't have to endure another idiotic Soloman idea. Such as "we don't publish the dimensions", because "we're beyond dimensions, we're about fun".

Remember when they tried to get away from telling us how long a ski was? They tried to do away with length in centimeters to move to a "Power" number. You would be told what Power Number you were after height and weight etc. Well, it didn't work at all. Everyone just wanted to know how freaking long the things were. It was a total failure. Is this Round 2 of that?

 

Remember "Swatch Time"? It gave time a number which would be the same all over the world. That was 1998.

It's not a bad idea except of course they had to orient it in Switzerland, not at Greenwich, England where the rest of the world starts time.

Eventually, an idea like that might take hold.

 

Here's a couple articles on Swatch Time:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

http://geertlovink.org/texts/net-times-not-swatch-time/

 

Why are the tails of the pair on the right so differently shaped? Which are the real production version? Or, do they have different "Fun" numbers for each pair?

Seeing these at Aspen/Snowmass, with no graphics, they looked like Lawn Darts with that tip.

post #18 of 44
Thread Starter 

The photo of the tail is of one of the skis in the RH photo...

 

Someone here needs to get to one of the demos and come back with a review.

post #19 of 44

Was on Volkl AC4-50 last 4 years and got some Line Motherships last year. They have made my Volkls  obsolete for crud and powder and are just as safe to ski on firm groomers as well, although to start off I was

a little nervous.  Their ability to handle like the ACs but better is due to the slightly rockered tip and softer tail than the ACs which offsets the 111mm width under foot.  They feel amazingly quick turning in powder/heavy snow as they dont sink much like the ACs do.

post #20 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by axebiker View Post

Sure looks a lot like a larger version of the Axendo series. I haven't found a Salomon worth skiing on inn the last decade +. If I'm healed up next year, I might have to give these a whirl, but I don't know that the would translate well to the style of skiing I do today. Certainly not for tele...


You need to get on some of the new Salomons then..the Enduro and Sentinel are fantastic skis.

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #21 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philpug View Post




You need to get on some of the new Salomons then..the Enduro and Sentinel are fantastic skis.



I already have the Mantra.  wink.gif

post #22 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by axebiker View Post





I already have the Mantra.  wink.gif


Then you REALLY should get on the Sentinel.

 

SJ

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #23 of 44

 

Quote:

I get the point, but I pray we don't have to endure another idiotic Soloman idea. Such as "we don't publish the dimensions", because "we're beyond dimensions, we're about fun".

Remember when they tried to get away from telling us how long a ski was? They tried to do away with length in centimeters to move to a "Power" number. You would be told what Power Number you were after height and weight etc. Well, it didn't work at all. Everyone just wanted to know how freaking long the things were. It was a total failure. Is this Round 2 of that?

 

Just to place a little historical perspective on that particular "idiotic" idea...............those skis with the power numbers changed the world of ski construction, marketing and sales as we knew them and they outsold the market handily. Every other ski maker in the world would have given their left nut and their firstborn to have a total failure like that. Obviously the consumer really didn't care all that much how freaking long they were......they bought them by the tens of thousands anyway.

 

So.....if this is idiocy round two......I'm sure that Salomon will be very happy if the results tend to mirror round one.

 

SJ 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #24 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tog View Post

Why are the tails of the pair on the right so differently shaped? Which are the real production version? Or, do they have different "Fun" numbers for each pair?
 


Notice that if the tails -weren't- differently shaped there would be a large mismatch in groomer turn effective radius between the two ski lengths.  

post #25 of 44

Tog,  I worked for Salomon when their skis were first introduced and was a big fan of the Power Rating system because it placed the largest value on weight, then skiing level, and lastly the speed & aggressiveness culminating in a power reference.  Obviously a ski does not know how tall you are however it does know how much you weigh, how strongly you carve, and how aggressively you ski and this system accurately match these parameters to the stiffness of the shackle springs it placed under your feet.  I still think it genius!

post #26 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by bud heishman View Post

Tog,  I worked for Salomon when their skis were first introduced and was a big fan of the Power Rating system because it placed the largest value on weight, then skiing level, and lastly the speed & aggressiveness culminating in a power reference.  Obviously a ski does not know how tall you are however it does know how much you weigh, how strongly you carve, and how aggressively you ski and this system accurately match these parameters to the stiffness of the shackle springs it placed under your feet.  I still think it genius!



X2. If I skied a S9000 in a PR8, the 3S (J-turn slalom) was a 202, The 2S (round turn slalom) was a 205, the 1S (Giant Slalom) was a 212. If I added the F9 3S (bump ski) that was a 198. This is not too indifferent to what we do now looking at different types of skis. I will also add Salomon's "Volume Sizing" for boots, where they put priority on ankle volume was also ingenious . 

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
post #27 of 44

I skied this ski 3 weeks ago, let me tell you the first thing that comes to mind when you but your boot in the bindings and go is "WEIRD" lol

 

It looks like you're on water ski's, kinda cool and certainly gets a lot of looks and questions like "What in the world are those"

 

After you get over that, skiing this thing is really great, but you can't ski it like a normal ski and put pressure on the shovel, trust me if you ski this ski like you would say a Head Chip 71, or the Nordica Spitfire EDT you're going to end up on the snow (oops). It likes to be skied more centered where you're pressure is downwards through the binding rather than loading the front. It can certainly hold an edge at high speeds on groomed trails. I unfortunately couldn't try it in powder or crud that time.

 

Turn initiation was quick and nimble and I found that you had to be careful at the end of the turn or the tails would wash out a bit. Which is likely from trying to ski it like a normal ski.

 

All in all I liked it, not sure I would buy one just yet but I am intrigued to see how it's going to develop.

 

One of the hills around here is supposedly getting some as demo's to use for "High Performance Carving" lessons, we'll see.

 

I should also add that I hadn't skied on a Salomon since the X-Scream maybe 7-8+ years ago and after trying the BBR I tried the Xwing Tornado Ti PL one night this week and WOW, was I surprised by what that ski can do. So much so that I kept it to try it this weekend again.

 

Jay

post #28 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by SierraJim View Post




Then you REALLY should get on the Sentinel.

 

SJ


That's what my high school buddy who's the Salomon rep in CO told me.  wink.gif

 

I'm kinda busy nursing a shredded ankle right now though.  Just sold one pair of Mantras...but replaced them with the new Bridges, which I won't be able to get on until next year!  mad.gif

post #29 of 44

Skied it in powder last week and today. Looks funny. Works good.

post #30 of 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by axebiker View Post


  Just sold one pair of Mantras...but replaced them with the new Bridges, which I won't be able to get on until next year!  mad.gif


Definitely a move in the proper direction.

 

SJ

Bringing World Cup caliber ski equipment and service to all skiers - from pro ski racers to everyday all mountain skiers and into the...

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Ski Gear Discussion