Awesome
Pros: Float on Pow, Light Weight
Cons: None yet
Pros: Float on Pow, Light Weight
Cons: None yet

Pros: Easy to enter, Easy to switch modes, improved downhill performance, swappable
Cons: Heavy for a tech binding

Pros: Free pivot switch, immunity to icing, adjustable,underfoot cable routing, excellent touring ROM
Cons: weight, cable flops around when transporting.

Pros: Still light, flip-up climbing posts, power towers
Cons: Price, clockwise only heel rotation, unproven durability
“ I have literally been all over the hill with this ski. It is an excellent ski to be on. I was 25 years on Alpine boards, then made the switch to Tele. I picked these up for a song along with G3 Targa bindings. Didn't know anything about them when I got the skis, just that they were the right size and couldn't wait to turn 'em. They are a very easy ski to learn on. quite forgiving, able...” --iceclymbrr
“ Finally made the change from Dukes and Fritschis. These weigh half as much as the fritsch and 1/3 of the dukes. Tour better and ski better than either binding IMO. <3 The fritschi is better for rolling tours where you need to change modes frequently and are easier to use, easier to adjust the heel lifter etc... Dynafits take a little practice to tour on. ” --tromano
“ I have used Fritschi bindings since the original Diamir binding came out over 10 years ago. I have never had an issue with the binding's performance while touring other than an occasional ice up that would happen to any touring binding given the snow and temperature. It is the most proven, reliable, bomb proof system on the market. The Freeride + and the newer Freeride...” --choucas
“ This is Dynafit's (and one of the AT boot business') best effort at making a touring boot that performs going downhill at a level very close to an alpine boot. It's still not at the level of a high end alpine boot, but for off piste skiing, it does everything it needs to do. It tours well. My old AT boots were first generation Garmont Adrenalins, and the Dynafit tops that in...” --choucas
“ Reviewing after a good deal of time on snow - so Durability and Performance are tried and true. These are the first sidecountry binding I bought. My needs are 90% inbounds. ” --matheu26
“This binding is one of a kind. I have tried all other touring style bindings and find that only the Duke can ski the front side of the mountain all day, jump off cliffs in bounds or out, and still with the flip of a switch have the freedom of the freeheelers. I would recommend it to anyone who uses lifts to access their backcountry terrrian or for those that cant afford more than one setup...” --MileHighGuy
“ my first binding. i skiied them for over 10 years. i would give it a perfect rating except i now ski the Axils and i like those even more. ” --billjhmr
“ Ok lotta BS about these but I never write any reviews but this is the most DEPENDABLE safe binding period. My level of skiing increased 20% after using these bindings over the years and been an avid tele skiier since 1980.... really! BUY IT..” --Erockstar1969
“ I sprung for the Factors during a week-long trip to Chamonix for some off-piste skiing. Thus far, I have been 100% satisfied. I have not done any touring, so I can"t speak for how this boot is for skinning or multi-day tours. But for accessing hike-to terrain (or just walking around the bar!), I found the walk mode i these boots to be wonderful. If you are skiing off piste in Europe and...” --EuroHound
“In the world of alpine touring weight inevitably becomes an issue. However, for alpine converts downhill performance and convenience take precedence and herein lies the appeal of G3's Onyx, the heaviest tech binding on the market. The Onyx provides several things missing from the typical tech binding (read: Dynafit). First, they are easier to get in to. True, you do have to hold the toe pins...” --Dostie