- Joined: March 2008
- Location: Carlsbad, California
- Post Count: 232
Concur w/everyone 8.7 is just a little better ski for what you are looking for.. NFP has is right, I found the ac50 a little hooky in crud and I don't like that, 8.7 has a very nice overall flex in almost any type of snow which allows you to charge on groomers or blast some crud.. If you are a true level 9 then I would go with the 174 at your weight... Happy hunting...
Every man dies, but not every man lives......
- Joined: April 2002
- Location: Oregon: Bend/Sunriver
- Post Count: 2,328
The 8.7 is a great ski for what you are looking for. I would recommend the 174: the 167 was a little short for my tastes at 5 foot 9, 155lbs. That was awfully short for anything but strictly a frontside carve (I ski the 8.1 in a 172cm). Also, you may want to consider the new Sultan 85 from Dynastar. If there is one complaint I have with the 8.7 for lighter skiers: it is a bit stiff at the tip and can be more work than I would like in bumps. The Sultan 85 seemed to be a more versatile tool for lighter skiers. I had a pair of 8.7's last year but am moving over to the Sultan 85 this year: I will let you know how it goes once we get a couple more feet of snow.
Dawgcatching.com is now live! Use the epicski20 code to get an additional 20% off on our sale prices!