EpicSki  ›  The Barking Bear Forums  ›  Skiing Forums  ›  Ski Gear Discussion  ›  100mm waist skis (Shogun, ObSETHed, Gotama, Prophet 100)

100mm waist skis (Shogun, ObSETHed, Gotama, Prophet 100)

#1
Rating: 0
Hey I'm looking for a powder ski that can still be an everyday ski. I ski 75% powder in the trees and that's what this ski will be used for. I've researched quite a bit and have came to the skis listed in the title. Would the Shogun be too long for me in a 182 (160lbs, 6ft, advanced skier). Does a small rocker make a ski feel any different? It would be nice if you put them in order (best to worst) but mainly just wanting your experience with these skis.

Thanks a bunch

Edit: This is how i order them (best to worst) Shogun, Prophet 100, Gotama, ObSETHed,

Export to Wiki
#2
Rating: 0
If you ski 75% pow in trees, I would go with a tip rockered ski.
Export to Wiki
#3
Rating: 0
75% of your ski days are powder in the trees??? Wow, you are either very selective or very lucky...

Well OK.....................if that's the deal then this is a case where a ski with some rocker could well qualify for everyday use. Having said that, the only ski that is rockered on your list is the '10 Gotama and for my tastes, it's my least fave of this group. Still for 75% POWDER IN THE TREES I might reconsider b/c it is very nice in soft snow. Of the others, the Shogun has marketing rocker only but is a very good ski and is my favorite of this group. The P-100 has no rocker and is very good too, esp in longer sizes. The Sethed is among my favorite K2's.

SJ
www.starthaus.com   (Check out SH ski deals #2 in the special deals forum)
Export to Wiki
#4
Rating: 0
this is a case of demo-required. If you have never demoed a rocker, don't just jump into one unless you have tried it and decided for yourself. That's a pretty interesting list in that those skis are pretty different from each other. I could add another 10 skis to that list.
Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#5
Rating: 0
Last year my son and I did a try-5-in-one-day demo at Kirkwood last year, and I'd agree there are big differences between different 100 mm skis.  He loved the Obsethed and I loved the Coomba.  (My son is tall and skinny and I'm a bit overweight, which may affect things).  There were other skis we seriously disliked.  Unfortunately, we could not try each others, cause our boot sole lengths/DIN's are different.  I did not get a chance to try the Obsethed.
Export to Wiki
#6
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Finndog View Post

this is a case of demo-required. If you have never demoed a rocker, don't just jump into one unless you have tried it and decided for yourself. That's a pretty interesting list in that those skis are pretty different from each other. I could add another 10 skis to that list.

Really? I thought these skis were all about the same ( 100-105mm waist, slight tip rocker). It would be awesome if you told me how these skis are so different because I thought the complete opposite.
Export to Wiki
#7
Rating: 0
O yea, and SJ I said 75% of my skiing was in the pow because this is going to be my pow ski (I also have a 169 Volkl Bridge, I know its too short for me) and I the "powder" I'm describing is slightly choppy but still always light and a ton of fun which we have all year (3 chairlift ski hill with all nice snow and there is never ski lift lines). 


Export to Wiki
#8
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Downhillin99 View Post

I the "powder" I'm describing is slightly choppy but still always light and a ton of fun which we have all year (3 chairlift ski hill with all nice snow and there is never ski lift lines). 

 
I can't help you with ski suggestions but I sure would like to know the name of that ski resort.

Bob Peters Jackson Hole, WY       
North40 Realty
   
Me on twitter - http://twitter.com/bobpetersjh

Export to Wiki
#9
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Peters View Post



I can't help you with ski suggestions but I sure would like to know the name of that ski resort.
 
Ummm I'll give you some hints: North of Boise ID, Starts with a B, and sounds like Breckenridge (kinda).

If you don't figure it out just let me know

(this isn't paradise (but close to it ))

Edit: It's not Bogus


Export to Wiki
#10
Rating: 0
I was trying to make the same type of decision last year.  I was choosing between the Czar, Obsethed, Coomba, and K2 Anti Piste.  I ended up going with the Anti Piste since it popped up on Tramdock at a good price.  It was also the ski I was leaning toward since it's a bit of a compromise having tip rocker, but being normal camber underfoot.  K2 Coomback is a very similar ski in this years K2 lineup.

Haven't skied it yet and probably won't till I get out west in 2010.  I'll do a review when I finally do.

Good luck with the search!

Mike
Export to Wiki
#11
Rating: 0
 The Shogun is the best choice for all mountain use. It takes a good imagination to see any rocker in the Shogun.  But it is stiffer than I expected and looks good for every day use.  It shows quite a bit of camber = pretty good hard snow ski.

The Gotama is a pretty good allrounder, but has some actual rocker, as a result I expect the pow performance to be slightly better than the Shogun.  I thought it worked great in spring conditions. The 186 is a nice length. Edge hold is respectably.  The tip is actualyy an elongated early rise tip.  It looks like a DH ski on the snow.  Close to a continuous  curve rocker shape.  Fun and easy to ski in variable conditions.

 Neither the Got or Shogun is a deep snow ski imho.  

I thought the ObSethed was squirrely and have not been on the Prophet 100.

If you really need something dedicated to Powder in trees you should demo the Armada JJ.  It feels like surfing on an agile longboard.  It just makes it easy and fun.


Edited by Gotama - 9/22/09 at 8:34pm

 "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." Yoda to Anakin Skywalker

Export to Wiki
#12
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Downhillin99 View Post



Ummm I'll give you some hints: North of Boise ID, Starts with a B, and sounds like Breckenridge (kinda).

If you don't figure it out just let me know

(this isn't paradise (but close to it ))

Edit: It's not Bogus

 

?




Bob Peters Jackson Hole, WY       
North40 Realty
   
Me on twitter - http://twitter.com/bobpetersjh

Export to Wiki
#13
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Peters View Post




?



 
Yup!

That's it but that is an old picture, they have put in a small lift and a medium sized lift on the backside.

Here are some recent links (I don't know how to paste a pick like you did)

Frontside: http://sangres.com/cimages/idaho/skiareas/brundage01big.jpg
Backside: http://sangres.com/cimages/idaho/skiareas/brundage02big.jpg

Export to Wiki
#14
Rating: 0

Looks like a Brundage to me. 

Very cool area and some great snow.

Growing old is mandatory.  Growing up is optional.

Export to Wiki
#15
Rating: 0
 

Growing old is mandatory.  Growing up is optional.

Export to Wiki
#16
Rating: 0

to answer your question, the Goat and the Obseth are rockered the Shogun is really just an early rise, I don't beleive it has any tail rocker. The Line 100 is traditonal. The obseth is very soft, the goat, moderate, the Shogun is supposedly (i haven't skied it) pretty stout and the 100 is in that mid stiff to stiff range. So there's a fair amount of range in the ski choice, the Obseth is the most different. The 100 and the Shogun are marketed as being more "all mountain" capable.  All are good choices, it just seems you might want to decide if you want/like a rocker or not first. Enjoy! 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Downhillin99 View Post

Hey I'm looking for a powder ski that can still be an everyday ski. I ski 75% powder in the trees and that's what this ski will be used for. I've researched quite a bit and have came to the skis listed in the title. Would the Shogun be too long for me in a 182 (160lbs, 6ft, advanced skier). Does a small rocker make a ski feel any different? It would be nice if you put them in order (best to worst) but mainly just wanting your experience with these skis.

Thanks a bunch

Edit: This is how i order them (best to worst) Shogun, Prophet 100, Gotama, ObSETHed,

 


Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#17
Rating: 0
 Finn:

I have a pair of 182 Shoguns in my hands..

Base to base I see some good camber and no tip rocker or early rise.  Fully weighted on the snow they may decamber a bit, otherwise very subtle (no discernable) rocker,  tip or tail.

My 186 Gotamas have a noticeable reverse camber with early rise tip.




 "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." Yoda to Anakin Skywalker

Export to Wiki
#18
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotama View Post

 Finn:

I have a pair of 182 Shoguns in my hands..

Base to base I see some good camber and no tip rocker or early rise.  Fully weighted on the snow they may decamber a bit, otherwise very subtle (no discernable) rocker,  tip or tail.

My 186 Gotamas have a noticeable reverse camber with early rise tip.



 
Is it the 2010 Shogun? Because I think Salomon just introduced the rocker in the Shogun (not too sure about that).

Export to Wiki
#19
Rating: 0
Ok, so I'm taking the ObSETHed out of the picture. It doesn't sound very all mountain and it sounds like the wrong ski for me. Gotama is still in the picture but I would much rather try (or buy) the Shogun or the Prophet 100. Have you guys had any personal skiing experince with either of these skis? Any more thoughts if it was just the Sho and the P 100? What would you choose for my conditions?

thanks

Gotama: Are those your Shoguns and have you skied them? If so it would be awesome if you would compare and contrast the two skis.

Export to Wiki
#20
Rating: 0
the new shogun has an early rise, I doubt more than 5/5 no tail rise. you have to put them back to back to see it, (just in case you didn't know, no offense if you did)  I am assuming you prefer stiffer skis in powder and trees?
Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#21
Rating: 0
Gotama just to be clear on confusing terminology, I just checked the Volkl site the goat looks like its a rockered tip that has the same height as the tradtional tip, but is about 5mm taper-rise? A little different.  looks like traditional tail and pretty neutral camber. What is that your take.
Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#22
Rating: 0
If your home area is like mine and it sure looks like it is... I would go with a 185 PRaxis powder and some used AM ski for high presure weeks like a K2 PE or legend 8000.  If you don't want a full reverse / reverse then go S7 or atomic thugs  something like that. You can't go too fat on smaller pow lines in the trees. You can probabbly get both used at TGR for the cost of a pair of gotamas. $.02
Export to Wiki
#23
Rating: 0
Thanks for the advice tromano but we get a lot (80%) of ski days with 3-7 inches of kinda choppy powder and only like 5-10 big pow days so I don't think I want pow boards.  Thanks though.
Export to Wiki
#24
Rating: 0
 I have the new Shogun.  There was no OLD shogun. 2010 Salomon Shogun.  Looks good, stiff, plenty of camber, and 101 under foot.

The 2010 Gotama I have skied about 10 days last spring.

If you put them ( Gotamas) base to base there is only a small contact point around boot center.  Volk Katanas are flat camber wise, the 2010 Gotama definetly has more reverse camber in the design. Shogun has visible positive camber, very different from the 2010 Gotama.

If you put the Shogun base to base the contact points are traditional tip and tail spots.  Not a rocker or continuous cure or reverse camber design.

On the snow the tip of the Got is not touching on hardpack.  Low rise tip appears  like a downhill ski.  Very low, but rising up from just in front of the bindings.

My first days out on the Gots my ski buddies were afraid I might "spear" into any built up bumps or moguls due to the low tips, but they are very compliant and seem to "snake" over most 3-d features.

Variable spring conditions = Gotama's playground.

I have not skied the Shoguns yet, but in my mind it seems like a substitute for a Mantra or LP vs a dedicated soft snow ski.

 "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." Yoda to Anakin Skywalker

Export to Wiki
#25
Rating: 0
Sounds like the Shogun would ski like last year's Gotama (reg camber) based on specs. As in an all mountain fat ski.  

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotama View Post

 If you put the Shogun base to base the contact points are traditional tip and tail spots.  Not a rocker or continuous cure or reverse camber design.
 
Export to Wiki
#26
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotama View Post

 I have the new Shogun.  There was no OLD shogun. 2010 Salomon Shogun.  Looks good, stiff, plenty of camber, and 101 under foot.

The 2010 Gotama I have skied about 10 days last spring.

If you put them ( Gotamas) base to base there is only a small contact point around boot center.  Volk Katanas are flat camber wise, the 2010 Gotama definetly has more reverse camber in the design. Shogun has visible positive camber, very different from the 2010 Gotama.

If you put the Shogun base to base the contact points are traditional tip and tail spots.  Not a rocker or continuous cure or reverse camber design.

On the snow the tip of the Got is not touching on hardpack.  Low rise tip appears  like a downhill ski.  Very low, but rising up from just in front of the bindings.

My first days out on the Gots my ski buddies were afraid I might "spear" into any built up bumps or moguls due to the low tips, but they are very compliant and seem to "snake" over most 3-d features.

Variable spring conditions = Gotama's playground.

I have not skied the Shoguns yet, but in my mind it seems like a substitute for a Mantra or LP vs a dedicated soft snow ski.

If you go on Youtube and go here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd5wVOEPtRQ&feature=PlayList&p=1F85B917F945171B&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL&index=15     (Freeskier Magazine Review)      They say that it has a slight tip rocker and you can see a slight tip rocker. I don't know if that is a market rocker (I think it is) or not. Thanks for the compare & contrast with the Gotama and the Shogun!



Export to Wiki
#27
Rating: 0
did you look into the K2 lineup, I'm not  a huge fan of thier stuff but this seasons skis have received very good reveiws. http://k2skis.com/skis/backside/sidestash  the sidestash looks interesting and of coourse my favorite ski for what you are describing is the Icelantic Nomad, actual dims are 146-110-136. it comes in a 181 in either a stiffer standard version or a new SFT 30% softer. www.icelanticboards.com
Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#28
Rating: 0
My prior observation needs further discussion:
"If you put the Shogun base to base the contact points are traditional tip and tail spots.  Not a rocker or continuous cure or reverse camber design."

To Clarify the Shogun rocker deal I found:

If you put the Shoguns base to base and squeeze the cambered center together a noticeable bit of rocker splays at the tip and tail. It does not take much pressure to make this happen.

Very interesting.

Could this be the best of both designs in one ski?

 "Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering." Yoda to Anakin Skywalker

Export to Wiki
#29
Rating: 0

There seems to be a long road ahead in the evolution of "rockers" and there are several different types. This is confusing to the consumer as this all sorts out.  Which is why I strongly suggest a demo before you sink good money into a pair of new skis. rocker tip, tail, tip only, flat camber. reverse camber, reverse sidecut.......  a lot of different variations out there, just look at  JJ or S7 for multiple sidecuts and cambers. Interesting to see, and I think next season's (2011) will bring along further refinement and possibly the elimination of some apporaches. Just search here and you will see so many opinions about what folks like and don't like. Do you need them? No, certainly not, are they fun, heck, ya' my HB's are a blast but it's different and you may or may not care for them. I do think the 5/x or 10/x rocker is most versitile and possibly no tail rocker too. There seems to be a split in the approach though between the JJ and S7 designs and the more tradtional designs like the goat, Sultan and many others. Take a look at the Atomic Bentchetler and the blog. http://www.atomicsnow.com/catalogue/Alpine_US.pdf  page 6.

Be More Like Your Dog...
Export to Wiki
#30
Rating: 0


Quote:
Originally Posted by Gotama View Post

Could this be the best of both designs in one ski?

Probably not. The reason that I call the Shogun layout "marketing dept rocker" is that it has no discernible effect except in the brochure. The Shogun feels very similar to the conventional P-100 both in and out of the soft snow. Naturally, there is a difference in the flex with the Prophet being somewhat softer and hence slightly less powerful in broken and mixte salad conditions. Both skis are very good and both just feel "normal"

OTH, the Sidestash, Hardside, Czar, type of skis feel notably more floaty than either the Shogun or the Prophet in the mixed up stuff. However, when you get out of the goo, the forward portion of the ski feels rather disconnected.

Pick your poison but remember the give and take and don't expect a magic bullet that does both things.

SJ

www.starthaus.com   (Check out SH ski deals #2 in the special deals forum)
Export to Wiki