Thanks for checking out our community! We've got lots of great stuff going on around here... why don't you create an account and join the fun? Why?
good at this point and can they be adapted to wider brakes?
I haven't skied these in the last two seasons, but seeings how I've never had a Marker spring weaken, I was wondering what the rule of thumb is short of a bench test.
Sc Turbos Bionic 14 DIN
I think that's an incomplete model name, although the heel looks like it says M9 something. So they might be 9.2 Turbo SC Racing. In which case, they were still indemnified this year.
If you're thinking of using them, you should probably spring (pun intended) for a bench test. Assuming they pass, they're probably as good as they ever were.
That big "BIOMETRIC" on the toe would give me pause, though. Search here and at TGR for the reasons why.
9.1 Racing Turbo SC, figured they were 'approved'. Any idea on refitting with a wider brake?
Is there is Marker rep in the house?
Dad, thx for the link, sorry for the short name on the post.
I think those take the same basic brakes as the current line, but I'm not sure.
I have a pair of 120mm brakes from that vintage. Unfortunately, they're asymmetrical. But they (and the bindings to which they're attached) are yours if you want them.
Tx, but I think I have a buyer for them.
