Quote:
Originally Posted by crgildart 
I don't by cameras without a through the lens view finder in addition to the LCD cause the LCD is worthless outdoors. Cannon is one of the few brands that have that in the less expensive (< $400) models.
I guess it is also worthless if the crappy camera LCD breaks all together! I haven't had that issue but will send it back if I do. Thanks for the heads up.
|
You either get an SLR, though the lens, or on a point in shoot you looked though an optic to see whats going on, it might take a picture of what you are looking at. They rarely are lined up the same, or you will sometimes see more though the viewfinder then what actually is being taken, cause you are not looking though the lens, you are looking though a view finder.
The Cannon sd750 has a great screen on it. I bought it over some of the other ones on the shelf because it had a big screen!!!!!! You can see the screen practically anywhere but really intense sunlight, then it gets a little hard to see.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wear The Fox Hat 
crg, just a little correction for you - "Through the lens" is used to mean that it works off the same lens that the photo is taken with (such as in an SLR). What you're actually talking about is an optical veiwfinder. And I agree with you, I wouldn't buy a camera without one.
|
Like I said, view finders generally do not view what your actually taking. It's just a good guess. And with the technology the way it is, why are you getting upset at a camera which is giving you a though the lens look on a 3inch LCD Screen, as opposed to a hard to see image though a view finder which might not line up the picture the same?
Quote:
Originally Posted by skier_j 
The SD 750 is the second camera I purchased with point and shoot while skiing in mind. The first one I did just that, bought an SD 1000 that does have a viewfinder, ended up giving that to Ginger when we were out there for christmas last year and replaced with the SD 750 which does not have an optical viewfinder.
For skiing, I have not missed the viewfinder. And for the rest of the time---well, maybe once in a while I wished there was an optical viewfinder---but not often enough to regret the purchase. There was a time, before digital, when I would never consider using anything but a thru the lens camera of one sort or another. For my purposes now---not so much of a 'make it or break it' feature.
Just my discounted .02
|
Technology is moving beyond the view finder stages. Your either SLR or Point and Shoot at the moment. Twin Lens Reflex camera's are still used, but this is basically the same thing your getting with a compact point and shoot with a view finder. They still are handy, but i'd rather not squint though the view finder when I have a very nice screen.