Recheck the telebinding activeness flow chart:
I wouldn't say the typical cable tours better than a three pin, but mine are easier for touring than others. A true tele binding with a free pivot is a great combo if you are after turns as well. But there's a weight penalty. After retreading my leathers three times due to toe cracking at the pin holes, I swore I'd never use them again. Plus the action and bending on the duckbill isn't as smooth after using NNN bindings. The cable does help snap the ski and help with the turns. The claim for some BC NNN rigs is you can turn, but my Rossi boots are too weak in the ankles for good turns, but a beefier boot on BC NNN bindings could work.
For nomenclature's sake, I think of 'fishscales' as the older patterned bases where the 'scales' protruded from the bases, not the patterned bases which is cut into the bases......
When I got (
BCWorld thread) my Atomic Chugach's, their specs (including their turning crown pattern) matched their Fischer counterparts (Boundless), but were cheaper. A few others in the line did as well (Rainers=Rebounds). making me think they were from the same 'mold' or factory. The pattern ends just below the rear of the mounting area. The rossis have a patterned grip zone equidistant from the BOF. I'm starting to recall some slip out in some steeper and forward positions, making me further wonder about cheating the bindings forward a skootch.
BTW, we do have highly variable snow conditions and a 30° temp swing. Yesterday I was skiing in the teens at T-ride and today the snow was wet in the low 30's and raining in town.

:
Telerod, I've got a pair of Red Hot Chilis lonely and in a box if you want some cables for the cost of shipping. Cobras too (Kyle?).