demo'ed the metron b5 172 at lake liouse-at first thought it was not alot different than my atomic sx supercrosses on piste but heavyer ,but about 5 runs later I got in the groove with the ski and this ski rocked,super steeps, chowder ,drifted bumps, groomers and pow,what a nice ski,I felt like the ski was giving me a ride!!! Skied over 25000 vert and didn't wan't to go home!!!Tried the m10 in 172 and 162 and the ski just didn't track as well ,they were more work and less enjoyable ,I've skied the atomic r-11 and thought it tracked better than any ski ever, to me the b5 is as good but quicker and much better off piste ,was wondering if anyone has demo'ed all three b5 m10 and m11-a day or more each,for me anything less- unless I hate them after 5 or 6 runs,doesn't do a ski justice. M11 what to think? ski the POW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2/17/06 at 6:27pm


: I can get them both for about $400 with neox 422 bindings. The m11's cost slightly more, but from what I've read they seem slightly better. I've skied for about ten years and am a intermediate-advanced skier (I ski some double blacks at Toas, NM and blacks at whistler, but that's my limit). I'm fairly aggressive and like bumps, powder and trees (when I can find them), but don't enjoy groomed trails that much, though they are probably what I'll be skiing on most. I weigh about 110 pounds, however, and am 5'6". I'm looking at m11 152's and m10 150's. Please help me decide which is a better ski for me! Thanks A Lot.
